Zusammenfassung der Ressource
LIFESPAN DEVELOPMENT
- SOCIO -CULTURAL = RELATIONSHIPS & SOCIAL LEARNING
- HUMAN RELATIONSHIPS - SIBLINGS, PEERS, PARENTS - IMPORTANT TO DEVELOPMENT
- HORIZONTAL RELATIONSHIP - RECIPROCIAL- SIBLINGS AND PEERS
- RECIPROCITY = A GIVE AND TAKE RELATIONSHIP - EQUAL KNOWLEDGE
- OBSERVATIONAL LEARNING, INTERACTING & SHARING EXPERIENCES
- RELATIONSHIP EMOTIONALLY CHARGED
- NOTABLY DIFFERENT FROM PARENT CHILD RELATIONSHIPS - VERTICAL
- A SIBLING WILL THINK OF THEMSELF BEFORE ANOTHERS FEELINGS
- VERTICAL - PARENTS, TEACHERS, POLICE
- SOMEONE WITH MORE KNOWLEDGE OR POWER THAN YOU - NEED HELP FROM
- A MOTHER WILL TYPICALLY LOOK TO UNDERSTAND A CHILDS FEELINGS & THOUGHTS
- RELATIONSHIPS ARE INDIVIDUAL TO EACH PERSON/PEOPLE
- EVERY ONE IS DIFFERENT
- DUNN - SIBLING - OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
- FAIRNESS AND JUSTICE BETWEEN SIBLINGS IMPORTANT
- BIGGEST ISSUE BETWEEN THEM
- PLAYING TOGETHER - BRINGS SHARED MEANINGS & GOALS THAT ARE MUTUALLY AGREED
- VYGOTSKY
- HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL SUPPORTER
- CHILDREN LEARN ABOUT ROLES AND INTERACTION BY EXPERIMENTING WITH THEM
- OFFERS UNIQUE OPPORTUNITIES TO TEST OUT RULES OF SOCIAL INTERACTION
- SUBSTITUTE SYMBOLS FOR REAL WORLD.. RUG - ISLAND BOX - SHIP
- CONCEPT OF SELF, ROLES AND BEHAVIOUR - DEVELOPED THROUGH PLAY = LANGUAGE BEING MOST IMPORTANT.
- PSYCHOANALITIC = FOCUS ON EARLY INFLUENCES = ATTACHMENT
- BOWLBY'S THEORY = CHILDREN HAVE A DRIVE TO FEEL SECURE BY FORMING AN EMOTIONAL BOND WITH PRIMARY CAREGIVER
- PRIMARY CAREGIVER = PERSON WHO LOOKS AFTER THEM THE MOST
- BOWLBY
- INTERNAL WORKING MODEL = HOW YOU AND ANOTHER WILL RELATE TO EACH OTHER
- 3 COMPONENTS - 1 MODEL OF SELF, 2 MODEL OF CAREGIVER AND 3 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE 2 PEOPLE
- AFFECTS HOW WE VIEW FUTURE RELATIONSHIPS - UNHEALTHY, STRONG ETC
- ATTACHMENT = STRONG ONGOING EMOTIONAL BOND BETWEEN 2 PEOPLE
- 2 KEY ASSUMPTIONS - 1 PEOPLE HAVE CHARACTERISTIC STYLES IN RELATIONSHIPS THAT ARE SHOWN IN THE WAY THE BEHAVE TOWARDS OTHERS
- 2 THESE STYLES ORIGINATE FROM PREVIOUS RELATIONSHIPS - SO FIRST RELATIONSHIP WITH CAREGIVER HOLDS INFLUENCE
- ATTACHMENTS STYLES HAVE BEEN DESCRIBED BY REASERCHERS AS 1 CATEGORIES 2 TRAITS
- SECURE - INSECURE (AVOIDANT) - INSECURE (AMBIVALENT - UNSURE/INCONSISTENT)
- EARNED SECURITY
- SECURE ATTACHMENT TYPE - NOT NECESSARILY RELATED TO SECURE CHILDHOOD
- RUTTER
- EARNT SECURITY = ASSOCIATED WITH STRONG & POSITIVE MARRIAGE
- MAIN & GOLDWYN
- PEOPLE WHO HAVE HAD DIFFICULT CHILDHOOD BUT HAVE COME TO TERMS WITH IT AND MOVED ON.
- THIS IS WHAT EARNED SECURITY IS
- CHALLENGES IDEA THAT ATTACHMENT TYPE IS FIXED THROUGHOUT LIFE
- AINSWORTH
- STRANGE SITUATION
- LAB EXPERIMENT
- 3 ATTACHMENT TYPES - INSECURE/ANXIOUS, SECURE, INSECURE AMBIVILENT/UNSURE
- INSECURE/ANXIOUS = CHILD DOES NOT SEEK PROXIMITY ON SEEING CAREGIVER - REJECTS COMFORT
- SECURE ATTACHMENT - CHILD SEEKS PROXIMITY & ACCEPTS COMFORT
- INSECURE/ AMBIVALET/UNSUDE - INCONSISTANT SHOWING AVOIDANCE & CLOSENESS
- DOES INFANT ATTACHMENT INFLUENCE ADULT ATTACHMENT
- ZIMMERMAN
- ATTACHMENT TYPE - INSECURE/SECURE/AMBIVALENT = NOT A GOOD PREDICTOR OF ADULT TYPE
- LIFE EVENTS ARE SIGNIFICANT PREDICTOR
- HAMILTON
- STRONG CORESPONDENCE BETWEEN INFANT ATTACHMENT TYPE AND ADULT ATTACHMENT TYPE
- ONLY WHEN LIFE HAS BEEN STABLE
- CHILDREN WHO HAVE CHANGED ATTACHMENT TYPE ARE MORE LIKELY TO HAVE EXPERIENCED MAJOR LIFE EVENTS - DEATH, DIVORCE
- HOW DO MOTHERS INFLUENCE ATTACHMENT
- MOTHERS ATTACHMENT STYLE COULD PREDICT INFANTS BEHAVIOUR IN STRANGE SITUATION
- ADULT ATTACHMENT TYPES PREDICT HOW A MOTHER WILL ATTEND TO HER BABY - 35%OF VARIATION IN SENSITIVITY IS PREDICTED TO ADULT TYPE
- MATERNAL SENSITIVITY PREDICTS INFANT ATTACHMENT - 33% OF VARIATION
- SCHAFFER ( AND FREUD) BELIEVES CAN HAVE A RELATIONSHIP WITH
- OLDER SIBLING/PEERS THAT IS VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL
- ON VERTICAL LEVEL 2ND CHILD RESPECTS AND FOLLOWS OLDER
- ON HORIZONTAL = THEY CAN WORK TOGETHER ON A TASK
- SCHAFFER - SIBLINGS CAPABLE OF BOTH
- MEAD
- SELF = 2 PARTS = 1 + ME
- ME = WHATS KNOWN ABOUT SELF = PHYSICAL DESCRIPTIONS, CLOTHES, POSSESSIONS, MORALS
- ME - PERCEIVED ATTITUDES OF YOURSELF FROM OTHERS
- I = CONSCIOUS DECISSION MAKING PART OF A PERSON
- MAKING YOUR OWN CHOICES
- THROUGH LANGAUGE GAMES AND PLAY - CHILDREN TAKE ON VIEWS OF OTHERS ABOUT THEMSELVES & CAN SELF REFLECT
- THIS LETS THEM MAKE JUDGEMENTS ABOUT HOW OTHER PEOPLE WILL REACT - EVEN IF NOONES PRESENT
- THEORY OF MIND = PUTING YOURSELF IN SOMEONE ELSE POSITION
- BUT - DOES NOT EXPLAIN HOW THESE ABILITIES DEVELOP
- DOISE & MUGNY & PERRET-CLERMONT
- SOCIO COGNITIVE CONFLICT
- CHANGING OUR VIEW DUE TO OTHERS
- WORKING AS A GROUP IS BETTER THAN ALONE BECAUSE YOU WORK AS A PACK