Zusammenfassung der Ressource
(3) Devolved Government
- When has this process taken
place across the UK?
- The first election of the Scottish Parliament and the Welsh Assembly
were held in May 1999, follow successful referendum in 1997
- The Northern Ireland Assembly came into existence in
1998, as a consequence of the Good Friday Agreement
- All major party now
support devolution
- Devolution and
nationalism
- Sottish and Welsh nationalist grew in significant during the 1970's
due to growing electoral support and weakness of Labour Government
- Nationalism wavered in the 1980's
- By 1990's revised in nationalism due to growing
resentment against London basted Tory Govt for a
time, had no representatives in Scotland or Wales.
- Self-confident - north sea oil
- Labour interested in Devolution
- Labour works with SCC, Lib Dem's, a number of
small parties, Churches and other civil groups to
develop a frame work for Scottish devolution
- Plans for Welsh devolution
draw up in the same way
- Many in Labour hoped Devolution
would curve Nationalism
- Growing nationalism was due to
frustration at being ruled from London
by an English-dominated Parliament
- Devolution should weaken separatist
nationalism and in the process, strengthen the
UK due to increase control over domestic affairs
- Declining support for Both SNP and
Plaid Cymru in second round of
devolution elections in 2003
- The nationalist parties different
view of implication of devolutions
- Goal of SNP and Plaid Cymru are the Scottish and Welsh
independence, they saw devolution as a step on this road
- Devolution is likely to strengthen nationalism as it would help to give Scotland
and Wales clear political identities, creating the chance for more radical demands
- Scenario borne out of the defeat of the Lab-Lib Dem's coalition in the 2007
Scottish Parliament elections and the formation of a minority SNP administration
- Opinion polls in Scotland continue to show that
there is only minority support for independence
- Northern Ireland's devolution has had
contrasting implications for nationalism
- It has lead to a polarization of views, as support has grown for "extreme"
Unionist and Republican parties at the expense of "moderates" ones
- The prospect of participating in government has encouraged the DUP
and Sinn Fein to work together in a power sharing executive, may 2007
- More pragmatic forms of
Unionism and Republic
- Nature of Assembles
- Scotland, Wales and
Northern Ireland each
have different systems
of devolution
- The Scottish Parliament
- The Scottish Parliament is an
example of legislative devolution.
- It has primary legislative powers on most fields
of domestic policy and limited tax-varying
powers, raise or lower income tax by 3%
- Welsh Assembly
- The welsh Assembly was, an example of administrative devolution,
had no control over Tax and only secondary legislative powers
- Following an affirmative referendum in March 2011, the Assembly
gained primary legislative powers in all 20 areas of responsibilities
- Northern Ireland Assembly
- The Northern Ireland Assembly has some primary legislative power but no
control over taxation, although its power can be expanded in line with the
principle of "rolling" devolution if power-sharing proves to be successful
- Central government continues to retain control of overall
economic policy, defence policy and foreign affairs, NIA has
cross-border cooperation with the Republic
- Funding for the devolved bodies is allocated by the UK Treasury
as a "block", although the devolved institutions can spend their
blocks as they wish within the framework of their powers
- The devolved bodies
nevertheless have broad
responsibilities, including:
- Agriculture, forestry, fisheries and food
- Culture, media and sport
- Economic development
- Education and training
- Environment
- Health
- Home affairs (except Wales)
- Legal system (only in Scotland)
- Local government and housing
- Social services
- Trade and industry (very limited in Wales)
- Transport
- Has devolution made a diffence
- Some significant changes have
undoubtedly taken place in Scotland
- These include the abolition of upfront tuition fees
for uni students, the reintroduction of free long-term
care for the elderly and higher teachers' pay
- Local govt elections have
also been changed with the
intro of STV voting system
- The Welsh Assembly has pioneered new
initiatives in childcare and early years policies,
and has abolished prescription charges
- It has also reorganized the NHS to bring it
in line with local government boundaries
- The impact of devolution in NI has
limited by the suspension of the Northern
Ireland Assembly between 2002 and 2007
- The restoration of power-sharing between the DUP and
Sinn Fein is likely to provide the basis for the development,
over time of a distinctive approach to domestic policy,
- Quasi-federalism?
- Process rather than a event. This implies that the
establishment of devolved bodies was not an end in itself.
It was a prelude to further, and more radical change
- UK described as a
formQuasi-federalism
- It implies that devolution has gone beyond the simple handing down of power
by a sovereign Westminster Parliament and has come to resemble federalism
- Why has Quasi-federalism
come about?
- The devolution has been
strengthened in the UK by a
number of factors
- Democratic legitimacy
- A major factor in determining the success
of devolution in the UK was the decision to
hold devolution referendums in 1997
- These ensured that newly created
devolved bodies began life with a
measure of democratic legitimacy
- Subsequent elections in 1999, 2003, 2007 and 2011 have bolstered the
democratic credentials of the devolved institutions and helpesd to strengthen the
sense of separate Scottish, Welsh and Northern Ireland Irish political identities
- Asymmetrical devolution
- The uneven nature of devolution tends to
strengthen centrifugal forces within the UK
- This is because where devolution was initially weaker, as
in Wales, the existence of stronger version of devolution
serve to fuel demands for greater decentralization
- This has been evident in growing calls
in Wales for full legisltive devolution
- Any increase in the powers of weaker
devolved bodies will encourage stronger
bodies to demand greater autonomy
- Party control
- The full significance of devolution was disguised by the
fact that, in its early years, Labour rules in Westminster
and in Edinburgh and Cardiff - minority or coalition govt
- Policy differences and
political disagreements
are likely to me modest
- A change in govt at either level, would
create political distance between
central govt and devolved bodies
- The election of a majority SNP administration in
Scotland in 2011 thus raises the prospect of further
devolution and possibly even Scottish independence
- Realignment of
pressure group politics
- Devolution has significant
altered patterns of pressure
groups politics in the UK
- Businesses, trade unions and promotional
groups of various kinds increasingly look to
influence policy through devolved bodies
- As these groups establish closer links with devolved bodies
they, are likely to support growing demands for further
decentralization and strengthened devolved powers
- The English question
- The most glaring example of asymmetrical devolution in the
UK is the fact that England, With 84% of the UK population,
has remained entirely outside the devolution process
- This has happen for
very good reasons
- Devolution has largely been a response to the growth of sub-UK
nationalisms which have been fulled by resentment that Scotland, Wales
and Northern Ireland have been ruled by an English-dominated Parliament
- The sheer size of England makes the idea of an English Parliament highly
problematical. If the domestic affairs of 84% of the UK population were determined
by an English Parliament, what would be the purpose of the Westminster Parliament
- The absence of English devolution
has been a cause of constitutional
and political difficulties
- The political difficulties that this has generated have
been reflected in growing resentment in England that it
is only part of the UK that lacks a discrete political voice
- English taxpayers have been funding policy
innovations and improved services in Scotland
and Wales that have not benefited England
- Although the so called "Barnett formula" aims eventually to bring about a
convergence in per capita spending, block funding continues to advantage
Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland at the expense of England
- A possible solution to these problems would be the
introduction of a system of regional government in England
that would complement the devolved assemblies elsewhere
- In 1998, the Blair government therefore set up nine Regional
Development Agencies (RDA's), with the possibility that these
could, be transformed into elected regional assemblies
- A strong "no" vote in 2004 referendum on the establishment of an assembly for
the North East of England has effectively blocked any further progress in this
direction by demonstrating little public support for English regional government
- In June 2010, the coalitions announced its
intention to abolish RDAs, further undermining
the prospects for English regionalism