ANDERSON AND DILL (2000)

Beschreibung

Mindmap am ANDERSON AND DILL (2000), erstellt von mrthrills am 06/05/2014.
mrthrills
Mindmap von mrthrills, aktualisiert more than 1 year ago
mrthrills
Erstellt von mrthrills vor mehr als 12 Jahre
38
1

Zusammenfassung der Ressource

ANDERSON AND DILL (2000)
  1. AIM
    1. VIOLENT VIDEO GAMES
      1. AGGRESSION
    2. PROCEDURE
      1. LABORATORY
        1. 210 PSYCHOLOGY STUDENTS
          1. INDEPENDENT GROUPS
          2. IV
            1. TYPE OF GAME
              1. AGGRESSIVE
                1. NON-AGRESSIVE
              2. DV
                1. VOLUME AND DURATION
                  1. WHITE NOISE
              3. TOLD MOTOR SKILL TEST
                1. 30 MIN PLAYING GAME
                  1. THEN REACTION TEST
                    1. WIN
                      1. CHOOSE VOLUME AND DURATION
                2. RESULTS
                  1. AGGRESSIVE GAME
                    1. LOUDER AND LONGER NOISE
                    2. FEMALES
                      1. GAVE LONGER AND LOUDER
                        1. BLASTS
                    3. CONCLUSION
                      1. VIOLENT GAMES
                        1. CAUSE MORE AGGRESSION
                          1. PARTICULARLY WOMEN
                        2. MAKES PEOPLE THINK
                          1. IN AGGRESSIVE WAYS
                          2. LONG TERM
                            1. CHANGE THOUGHT PATTERNS
                          3. EVAULATION
                            1. STRENGTHS
                              1. LAB
                                1. CONTROLLED
                                  1. RELIABLE
                                    1. APPLIES TO AGE RESTRICTION
                                  2. WEAKNESSES
                                    1. LIED TO PPS
                                      1. FAKE ENVIRONMENT
                                        1. DEMAND CHARATERISTICS
                                          1. NOT INFORMED
                                            1. NOISE STRESSFUL
                                              1. LACKS ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY
                                            Zusammenfassung anzeigen Zusammenfassung ausblenden

                                            ähnlicher Inhalt