The Shaping of American Anthropology 1883-1911- A Franz Boas Reader, Stocking
The Basic Assumptions of Boasian Anthropology

Three crucial themes in Boas's work on the idea of culture

Culture is explicit alternative to race in both the classification and and explanation of human differences.

Cultures have to be seen as products of highly contingent histories, as fusions of elements which originate in different times and places. Historicism explicit alternative to evolutionism.

Despite the emphasis on contingency in the choice of components within a culture, these components are brought together in a specific war according to the "genius of the people." Meaning, cultures need to be seen as wholes, each with it's distinctive genius, as well as assemblages of apparently random elements, each with it's different history.

Culture therefore pluralistic and relativistic

Alternative to scientific racism and ethnocentric evolutionism

Unresolved tension between culture as an assembly of historical fragments and culture as an integrated whole

Tension between physical and historical methods
Scientific laws existed in nature, external to the mind of the observer- starting with a hypothese was inferior to an inductive method. Thus, history entered as the necessary basis for derivation of laws and the history of the development of the physiological and psychological development of mankind. 2 purposes of tracing the full history:

Stripped away influence of surroundings
Once this phenomena with a psychic cause could be isolated, the historical process/ growth could be compared and then lead to the discovery of "general laws" of human development.

Only through history could cultural laws be established.

To Boas anthropology was distinguished by/ opinion on the discipline- Physical anthropological research integral part of his professional activity, along with evidence of culture and of language, provided an important approach to "the problem of the early history of mankind."
Attitude towards to classification: Distinction between Race and Language and Culture as a reflection of 3 distinct classificatory points of view and 3 different sets of historical processes
Work was critical and attacked pre-assumptions such as: "Rigid abstraction" of the 3 European races, evolutionary states of savagery, barbarism and civilisation
In fact each of the 3 areas were affected in a complex way by interacting historical processes.
> Impact of critiscm was relativist- race, language and culture could not be studied or ranked from a Eurocentric point of view- METHODOLOGICAL IMPACT
Emphasis on HISTORICAL processes : Classification end goal not starting point of investigation, depended on prior study of historical processes that would condition effects of present, the interacting processes came about in complexity.
Propagated "anthropological point of view" and anthropology as a science
Benedict and Mead= Evolved Boasians not strict ones

	Erstellt von Mariam Salah vor etwa 11 Jahre

Intro to Social Anthropology Notiz am Franz Boas, erstellt von Mariam Salah am 22/04/2013.