BUSL - Quiz #4

Beschreibung

Quiz am BUSL - Quiz #4, erstellt von ermarv12 am 30/04/2014.
ermarv12
Quiz von ermarv12, aktualisiert more than 1 year ago
ermarv12
Erstellt von ermarv12 vor etwa 10 Jahre
208
0

Zusammenfassung der Ressource

Frage 1

Frage
Causation-in-fact exists if the plaintiff would not have been injured but for the conduct of the defendant.
Antworten
  • True
  • False

Frage 2

Frage
Rita is injured when Steve's coffee-maker explodes due to a manufacturing defect. Rita may not sue the manufacturer for her injuries.
Antworten
  • True
  • False

Frage 3

Frage
Danny is negligent in driving his car and causing a collision with Edna's car. However, Danny pleads and proves Edna was in part comparatively negligent. This defense will prevent Edna from recovering for her injuries.
Antworten
  • True
  • False

Frage 4

Frage
Michael hears a splash in his backyard pool. Investigating, he sees a child he does not know struggling in the water. Michael fails to act and the child drowns. Michael's failure to act is negligence.
Antworten
  • True
  • False

Frage 5

Frage
Frank parks his car near an area where explosives are to be used. Signs nearby indicate possible damage to vehicles parked in the area. Frank returns to find his car damaged. Frank may recover for the damage to his car.
Antworten
  • True
  • False

Frage 6

Frage
Al, Bill, Chad, and Dan were found jointly and severally liable for $100,000 of property damages caused when a frat initiation event got out of control. Al, Bill and Chad do not have the money to pay their fair share of the damages. The only solvent defendant is Dan. The most Dan will have to pay the plaintiff is
Antworten
  • $25,000
  • $50,000
  • $75,000
  • $100,000

Frage 7

Frage
The negligence committed by a professional, such as a doctor or a lawyer, in the conduct of his profession is ____________.
Antworten
  • malpractice
  • negligence per se
  • negligence ad hominum
  • res ipsa locquitor

Frage 8

Frage
Gene is bringing a suit in strict liability for personal injuries caused by a defectively designed hair dryer. Which of the following parties can be defendant in this case?
Antworten
  • Electronic Designs, who designed the hair dryer
  • K&L, Inc. who manufactured the hair dryer
  • Big Retail Outlet, who sold the hair dryer to Gene
  • All of the above

Frage 9

Frage
Iris was at fault in a car crash in which Phil was injured. As they waited for the EMTs to arrive, a plane, which was part of a nearby air show, crashed into Phil, significantly increasing his injuries. Iris will not be liable for this second set of injuries because the plane crash was a
Antworten
  • proximate
  • legal
  • foreseeable
  • superseding
Zusammenfassung anzeigen Zusammenfassung ausblenden

ähnlicher Inhalt

Die Aufklärung (Karteikarten)
AntonS
Magnetismus
Peter Kasebacher
LEK 1-1
tobifant
Blended Learning in der Schule umsetzen
Laura Overhoff
Karteikarten Angewandte Sozialpsychologie
Sarah Rettätsfro
Arbeitsrecht (Fragen)
Maximilian Mustermann
Matura Übungsaufgaben Analysis
erwin.premstalle
Geschirrkunde
malimi something
Stundenplan
Damian Wierzchowski
Vetie Quiz Milch 2020
Katharina Enning
Vetie Geflügelkrankheiten Altfragen
Tropsi B