|
|
Created by Sam Grimley
over 7 years ago
|
|
Intro - Negligence is an unintentional tort
What are the implications of this on pure economic loss?
Policy considerations for not finding a duty for PEL under negligence
Legal reasons for not finding a duty for PEL in negligence.
Negligent Misstatement
Background to Hedley Byrne
Facts of Hedley Byrne
Finding in Hedley Byrne
Intro to details of judgement
Devlin
Reed
Morris
How has subsequent case law applied the judgement in Hedley Byrne?
How, specifically, have these 3 principle factors been treated in subsequent case law? (to follow)
Lord Devlin's 'assumption of responsibility'. What does it mean? Various definitions.
Williams v Natural Life
Smith v Bush
Spring v Guardian / Banco Nazionale v Playboy Club
Lord Reed: the requirement of reasonable and foreseeable reliance. Cases?
Reliance makes no sense
Reasonable reliance makes no sense (inc case)
Lord Morris's 'special skill on the part of the defendant'. Issues with case examples.
'skill of the defendant' makes no sense for DoC - belongs in another category
Conclusion - provides a remedy. Balancing policy considerations. Judges are trying to do too much at the first hurdle.
Hide known cards