Materials development for language learning and teaching - Tomlinson

Description

http://journals.cambridge.org Downloaded: 16 May 2012 IP address: 131.111.127.89 Lang. Teach. (2012), 45.2 , 143–179 c  Cambridge University Press 2012 doi:10.1017/S0261444811000528 State-of-the-Art Article Materials development for language learning and teaching Brian Tomlinson Leeds Metropolitan University brianjohntomlinson@gmail.com
diana.marsella.1
Quiz by diana.marsella.1, updated more than 1 year ago
diana.marsella.1
Created by diana.marsella.1 over 8 years ago
196
0

Resource summary

Question 1

Question
Do ‘Materials development’ refer to all the processes made use of by practitioners who produce and/or use materials for language learning, including materials evaluation, their adaptation, design, production, exploitation and research?
Answer
  • True
  • False

Question 2

Question
Tick the sources consider as Materials for Language Learning

Question 3

Question
Materials can be:

Question 4

Question
Tomlinson & Masuhara (2004: 7) proposed the following questions for evaluating criteria: a) Is each question an [blank_start]evaluation[blank_end] question? b) Does each question [blank_start]only ask[blank_end] one question? c) Is each question [blank_start]answerable[blank_end]? d) Is each question free of [blank_start]dogma[blank_end]? e) Is each question [blank_start]reliable in the sense[blank_end] that other evaluators would [blank_start]interpret[blank_end] it in the same way?
Answer
  • evaluation
  • only ask
  • answerable
  • dogma
  • interpret
  • reliable in the sense

Question 5

Question
Many reports on micro-evaluations of materials are written for sponsors of projects or for publishers and are, understandably, confidential. Some reports of evaluations of materials in action are dotted throughout the literature but are rarely collected in one volume or issue.Some reports of evaluations of materials in action are dotted throughout the literature but are rarely collected in one volume or issue. This is a point made by Ellis (2011: 234), who adds that such micro-evaluations are:
Answer
  • Always seen as not localised and big scale, and so theoretically interesting.
  • Often seen as too localised and too small scale, and so theoretically uninteresting.
  • Never seen as localised and middle scale, and so theoretically unuseful

Question 6

Question
Which Author did suggest that: 'Providing the learners with an important role in adapting the materials they are using. In order to involve learners in the process, she proposes that materials should actually be written with learner adaptation in mind, aiming to be learner-centred, flexible, open-ended, relevant, universal and authentic, and giving choices to learners.'?
Answer
  • McDonough & Shaw (2003
  • Madsen & Bowen (1978)
  • Cunningsworth (1984)
  • Saraceni (2003)

Question 7

Question
Tomlinson & Masuhara (2004: 11) aim ‘to [blank_start]help[blank_end] teachers to [blank_start]reflect[blank_end] upon their own [blank_start]practice[blank_end] and [blank_start]identify[blank_end] principles and [blank_start]systematic procedures[blank_end] for materials adaptation’.
Answer
  • help
  • create
  • reflect
  • understand
  • performance
  • practice
  • identify
  • define
  • linear operations
  • systematic procedures

Question 8

Question
Organice the 3 main aspect of 'Materials production' 1 [blank_start]How writers write[blank_end] 2 [blank_start]Principled development of materials[blank_end] 3 [blank_start]Practical guidance to writers[blank_end]
Answer
  • How writers write
  • Principled development of materials
  • Practical guidance to writers

Question 9

Question
What is the most common Approach in English coursebooks ?
Answer
  • TPR (Total Physical Response)
  • Silent Way
  • PPP (Presentation, Practice and Production)

Question 10

Question
In the last forty years [blank_start]materials development[blank_end] has progressed dramatically, both as [blank_start]an academic field[blank_end] and as [blank_start]a practical undertaking[blank_end]. We are now much more aware of the [blank_start]principles and procedures[blank_end] of materials development that are most likely to [blank_start]facilitate language acquisition[blank_end] and development and are much better at actually [blank_start]developing effective materials[blank_end]. Teachers also seem to be more [blank_start]constructively critical[blank_end] of their coursebooks and to be more willing, confident and able to localise and [blank_start]personalise their coursebooks[blank_end] for their learners.
Answer
  • materials development
  • an academic field
  • a practical undertaking
  • principles and procedures
  • facilitate language acquisition
  • constructively critical
  • developing effective materials
  • personalise their coursebooks
Show full summary Hide full summary

Similar

I'm the king of the castle
archita.kmr
Religious Studies - Keywords.
Ready2learn
Key Events, People and Terms of the French Revolution
poppwalton
Yr 12 Biology Mid-Year Exam Notes Part 1
gbridgland
Plant Anatomy Quiz
Kit Sinclair
Macbeth Essay Notes
Mel M
DEV I Part I
d owen
Comparative Study
Vitor_Cruz
Flashcards for CPXP exam
Lydia Elliott, Ed.D
CSA (115) ⊙ IITU 2017
Zhandos Ainabek
Histologie
Moloșnicov Tanciu