8754726
Descripción
Test por Róisín Farmer, actualizado hace más de 1 año
|
Creado por Róisín Farmer
hace alrededor de 7 años
|
|
Pregunta 1
Pregunta
Which three criteria are associated with the evaluation of qualitative research?
Respuesta
-
Reliability, validity and coherence
-
Coherence, resonating with readers and reliability
-
Situating the sample, reliability and grounding in examples
-
Coherence, resonating with readers and owning one’s perspective
Pregunta 2
Pregunta
Which are some of Lucy Yardley’s (2008) open-ended, flexible principles for judging the quality of qualitative analysis?
Respuesta
-
Sensitivity to context, validity and reliability
-
Sensitivity to context, commitment and rigour and transparency and coherence
-
Commitment and rigour, generalisability and transferability
-
Transferability, dependability and member checking
Pregunta 3
Pregunta
It is appropriate to use member checking as a credibility check when:
Respuesta
-
You have used discourse analysis to analyse your data
-
You are unsure if your analysis is correct
-
Your analysis aims to stay close to participants’ perspectives
-
You have produced a theoretical and conceptual interpretation of your data
Pregunta 4
Pregunta
You can ‘situate your sample’ by:
Respuesta
-
Disclosing identifying information about your participants
-
Describing what your participants were wearing during the interview
-
Providing a detailed summary of the demographic information you collected
-
Agreeing and disagreeing with your participants
Pregunta 5
Pregunta
In order to ‘ground in examples’ it is important to:
Respuesta
-
Discuss relevant literature
-
Support your analytic claims with illustrative data extracts
-
Provide an in-depth analysis of one, long data extract
-
Ensure there is a good fit between the data extracts and your analytic commentary
Pregunta 6
Pregunta
In a 10,000 word report, the introduction section should be about:
Respuesta
-
5,000 words long
-
2,500 words long
-
4,000 words long
-
1,000 words long
Pregunta 7
Pregunta
The purpose of a literature review in a qualitative research report is to:
Respuesta
-
Contextualise your research
-
Show how much you have read
-
Critique the methodological flaws of existing research and show how you will overcome them
-
Show how your study will relate to quantitative research
Pregunta 8
Pregunta
In the general discussion section of a qualitative report, it is always important to:
Respuesta
-
Introduce new material
-
Show how your research is better than quantitative research
-
Discuss the limitations of your sample
-
Evaluate the limitations of your research
Pregunta 9
Pregunta
Editing a draft of your report:
Respuesta
-
Is only important if you have used discourse analysis
-
Is only necessary to correct typos
-
Is an important part of good academic writing
-
Is only necessary when you are not happy with what you have written
Pregunta 10
Pregunta
One of the features of good qualitative poster design is:
Respuesta
-
Lots of text that tells the reader everything about the project
-
A font that can be read from 6-8 feet away
-
A really fancy font
-
A font that can be read from 2-4 feet away
Pregunta 11
Pregunta
A visually pleasing qualitative poster uses:
Respuesta
-
Lots of different colours
-
Lots of text
-
Lots of tables and figures
-
One or two background colours
Pregunta 12
Pregunta
Qualitative posters are easier to read when:
Respuesta
-
There is lighter text against a darker background
-
When text is presented in large blocks
-
There is darker text against a lighter background
-
When all the text is bullet pointed
Pregunta 13
Pregunta
Reliability is not a meaningful criteria for judging the quality of qualitative research because:
Respuesta
-
Qualitative research is biased
-
Qualitative research is unscientific
-
The findings of qualitative research will inevitably bear the mark of the researcher
-
Qualitative research has limited generalisability
Pregunta 14
Pregunta
One of the key quality criteria for discursive research is:
Respuesta
-
Member checking
-
Reader validation
-
Peer debriefing
-
Triangulation
Pregunta 15
Pregunta
Member checking assumes that:
Respuesta
-
Participants are the ultimate authority on their experience
-
Researchers are biased
-
Qualitative research is subjective
-
It’s difficult to produce good quality qualitative research
Pregunta 16
Pregunta
Providing a ‘thick description’ to enable another researcher to determine whether they can ‘safely’ transfer your findings to another context is Lincoln and Guba’s (1989) definition of:
Respuesta
-
Member checking
-
Credibility checking
-
Negative case analysis
-
Transferability
Pregunta 17
Pregunta
Elliot et al.’s (1999) guidelines for the publishability of qualitative research, include:
Respuesta
-
Respect of participants
-
Appropriate discussion
-
Owning one’s perspective
-
Appropriate methods
Pregunta 18
Pregunta
Credibility checks such as member checking are problematic in discourse analytic research because:
Respuesta
-
It takes too long
-
Participants will disagree with the findings
-
The analyst has the best insight into the data
-
The analysis does not aim to capture participants’ perspectives on their experiences
Pregunta 19
Pregunta
Some of the problems with member checking include:
Respuesta
-
Participants’ reluctance to disagree with the researcher’s interpretations
-
The difficulty of engaging participants in the process
-
Participants’ comments on the interpretations may be motivated by something other than helping the researcher best understand their experiences
-
All of the above
Pregunta 20
Pregunta
When giving an oral presentation of qualitative research you should:
Respuesta
-
Include as much information as possible on your PowerPoint slides
-
Use PowerPoint selectively to highlight key points and show data extracts
-
Not include any data quotes
-
Only discuss one theme
¿Quieres crear tus propios Tests gratis con GoConqr? Más información.