Pat Dunn
Test por , creado hace más de 1 año

Test sobre Police powers mid term review, creado por Pat Dunn el 06/11/2015.

11
1
0
Sin etiquetas
Pat Dunn
Creado por Pat Dunn hace más de 8 años
Cerrar

Police powers mid term review

Pregunta 1 de 23

1

A citizen can make an arrest if they have reasonable grounds to believe that someone has committed a criminal offence anywhere.

Selecciona uno de los siguientes:

  • VERDADERO
  • FALSO

Explicación

Pregunta 2 de 23

1

A citizen can make an arrest they have reasonable grounds to believe that somebody has committed an indictable offence anywhere.

Selecciona uno de los siguientes:

  • VERDADERO
  • FALSO

Explicación

Pregunta 3 de 23

1

A citizen can make an arrest if they find a person committing an indictable offence anywhere.

Selecciona uno de los siguientes:

  • VERDADERO
  • FALSO

Explicación

Pregunta 4 de 23

1

A citizen cannot make an arrest if they find someone committing a breach of peace.

Selecciona uno de los siguientes:

  • VERDADERO
  • FALSO

Explicación

Pregunta 5 de 23

1

A citizen can make an arrest if they have reasonable grounds to believe that someone has committed a criminal offence and AND is escaping from and is freshly pursued by person(s) who have lawful authority to arrest

Selecciona uno de los siguientes:

  • VERDADERO
  • FALSO

Explicación

Pregunta 6 de 23

1

Fraudulently Obtaining Transportation Sec 393 (3) is an example of a indictable offence

Selecciona uno de los siguientes:

  • VERDADERO
  • FALSO

Explicación

Pregunta 7 de 23

1

Take Motor Vehicle Without Owners Consent Sec 355 (1) CC is an example of a summary conviction offence.

Selecciona uno de los siguientes:

  • VERDADERO
  • FALSO

Explicación

Pregunta 8 de 23

1

Weapons Trafficking is an example of a summary conviction offence.

Selecciona uno de los siguientes:

  • VERDADERO
  • FALSO

Explicación

Pregunta 9 de 23

1

Check all that are summary conviction offences

Selecciona una o más de las siguientes respuestas posibles:

  • Nudity Sec 174 (1) CC

  • Trespass at Night Sec 177 cc

  • Alarming her Majesty Sec 49 CC

  • Inciting Mutiny Sec 53 CC

  • Harassing phone calls Sec 372(3) CC

Explicación

Pregunta 10 de 23

1

Theft under $5000 is a dual procedure offence

Selecciona uno de los siguientes:

  • VERDADERO
  • FALSO

Explicación

Pregunta 11 de 23

1

Possession of Firearm Knowing Possession is Unauthorized is a dual procedure offence.

Selecciona uno de los siguientes:

  • VERDADERO
  • FALSO

Explicación

Pregunta 12 de 23

1

Dual procedure offences are ALWAYS treated as indictable for arrest purposes

Selecciona uno de los siguientes:

  • VERDADERO
  • FALSO

Explicación

Pregunta 13 de 23

1

The police officer chooses to prosecute the dual procedure offence as summary conviction or indictable

Selecciona uno de los siguientes:

  • VERDADERO
  • FALSO

Explicación

Pregunta 14 de 23

1

Check all the answers that are considered 469 offences.

Selecciona una o más de las siguientes respuestas posibles:

  • Treason Sec 47 CC

  • Murder Sec 235 CC

  • Piracy Sec 74 CC

  • Harassing phone calls Sec 372(3) CC

  • Possession of small amounts of Schedule 2 Sec 4(5) CDSA

  • tempt to commit a S/C offence Sec 24(1)CC

Explicación

Pregunta 15 de 23

1

Anyone who (legally) arrests someone must turn the prisoner over to a peace officer (usually the police) forthwith.

Selecciona uno de los siguientes:

  • VERDADERO
  • FALSO

Explicación

Pregunta 16 de 23

1

Forthwith = instantly regardless of circumstances

Selecciona uno de los siguientes:

  • VERDADERO
  • FALSO

Explicación

Pregunta 17 de 23

1

As a Civilian – Can you search that person you have arrested?

Selecciona una de las siguientes respuestas posibles:

  • Yes

  • No

Explicación

Pregunta 18 de 23

1

A citizen can make an arrest if they believe a suspect is wanted on a warrant

Selecciona uno de los siguientes:

  • VERDADERO
  • FALSO

Explicación

Pregunta 19 de 23

1

Warrants to arrest are valid throughout the COUNTRY in which the warrant to arrest was created.

Selecciona uno de los siguientes:

  • VERDADERO
  • FALSO

Explicación

Pregunta 20 de 23

1

If you receive information from CPIC that a Warrant exists for the arrest of an Individual. Do you the Peace Officer Need the Warrant with you to arrest this party who is wanted on that warrant.

Selecciona uno de los siguientes:

  • VERDADERO
  • FALSO

Explicación

Pregunta 21 de 23

1

CASE LAW:

The defense argued that the accused had returned to the store to continue to steal, thus the offence was still continuing. The crown was arguing that this situation was not “on-going” in nature and that the shopkeeper had no rights as a citizen to make the arrest. Based on the evidence, the charges were dismissed against the shopkeeper.

Selecciona una de las siguientes respuestas posibles:

  • R. VS CHEN

  • R. VS MANN

  • R. VS FEENEY

Explicación

Pregunta 22 de 23

1

CASE LAW:

On December 23, 2000, in Winnipeg at around midnight, two police officers responded to a break and enter. While searching the neighbourhood, they spotted a young man matching the description of the suspect. He was described as a 21 year-old, 5 foot 8, Aboriginal male in a black jacket. The officers stopped the man, asked him some questions, and then gave him a pat-down. When patting the man down, the officer noticed a soft object in one of his pockets. The officer reached in and pulled out a bag containing 27 grams of marihuana.

Justice Laccobucci held that where a police officer detains a suspect on reasonable grounds they are allowed to give a pat-down only as a protective measure. Any search for the purposes of detecting and collecting evidence will not have been on reasonable grounds

Selecciona una de las siguientes respuestas posibles:

  • R VS CHEN

  • R VS FEENEY

  • R VS MANN

Explicación

Pregunta 23 de 23

1

CASE LAW:
The police, during a murder investigation in 1991, entered the accused's house (an equipment trailer) without permission. When they received no answer at the door, they entered, roused the accused, touched his leg, ordered him to get up and took him to the front of the trailer for better lighting. The police arrested him after seeing blood on his shirt. Following a caution with respect to the right to counsel but not the right to immediate counsel, the police asked the accused a couple of questions which he answered. The accused's shirt was seized and he was taken to the police detachment where, before the accused had consulted with counsel, further statements and the accused's fingerprints were taken. The police seized cash, cigarettes and shoes under a warrant obtained on the basis of the initial search of the trailer (the shirt and shoes), the initial interview (the shoes) and the later interview at the detachment (the cash under the mattress).

Selecciona una de las siguientes respuestas posibles:

  • R VS GODOY

  • R VS FEENEY

  • R VS MANN

Explicación