shn thm
Test por , creado hace más de 1 año

This quiz is based on the Non Fatal Offences Against the Person Act 1997.

414
0
0
shn thm
Creado por shn thm hace alrededor de 7 años
Cerrar

Non Fatal Offences

Pregunta 1 de 5

1

Rellena los espacios en blanco para completar el texto.

Definition of Assault is found in of the 1997 Act. Assault is defined as: A person shall be guilty of the offence of assault who, , intentionally or recklessly: a) to or causes an impact on the body of another, or
b) causes that he or she is likely to be subjected to any such force or impact.

Explicación

Pregunta 2 de 5

1

R v Ireland [1997]

Selecciona una o más de las siguientes respuestas posibles:

  • Words can negate acts that may constitute an assault. The act of placing a hand on the weapon was in itself an assault, since he also said that he "would not take such language" it negated the reasonable fear of immediate battery.

  • Apprehension of force. Under this case, the defendant subjected the victim to a campaign of silent phone calls, thus instilling fear in the victim that the caller's arrival at her door was imminent. Fear of immediate violence.

  • Schoolboy hid acid in hand dryer. Since he had turned on the hand dryer himself, the defendant was guilty of assaulting the other boy who was badly injured by his indirect action. Indirect infliction of force. In line with Sec 2 of the 1997 Act.

  • Allows for a level of implied consent in general daily interactions, ie jostling in supermarkets or a handshake. Only when the defendant knows of believes that the victim doesn't want to be touched, is he committing an offense.

Explicación

Pregunta 3 de 5

1

Tuberville v Savage (1669)

Selecciona una de las siguientes respuestas posibles:

  • Words can negate acts that may constitute an assault. The act of placing a hand on the weapon was in itself an assault, since he also said that he "would not take such language" it negated the reasonable fear of immediate battery.

  • Allows for a level of implied consent in general daily interactions, ie jostling in supermarkets or a handshake. Only when the defendant knows of believes that the victim doesn't want to be touched, is he committing an offense.

  • Apprehension of force. Under this case, the defendant subjected the victim to a campaign of silent phone calls, thus instilling fear in the victim that the caller's arrival at her door was imminent.

Explicación

Pregunta 4 de 5

1

DPP v K [1990]

Selecciona una o más de las siguientes respuestas posibles:

  • Allows for a level of implied consent in general daily interactions, ie jostling in supermarkets or a handshake. Only when the defendant knows of believes that the victim doesn't want to be touched, is he committing an offense.

  • Apprehension of force. Under this case, the defendant subjected the victim to a campaign of silent phone calls, thus instilling fear in the victim that the caller's arrival at her door was imminent.

  • Schoolboy hid acid in hand dryer. Since he had turned on the hand dryer himself, the defendant was guilty of assaulting the other boy who was badly injured by his indirect action. Indirect infliction of force.

Explicación

Pregunta 5 de 5

1

Collins v Wilcock [1984]

Selecciona una o más de las siguientes respuestas posibles:

  • Allows for a level of implied consent in general daily interactions, ie jostling in supermarkets or a handshake. Only when the defendant knows of believes that the victim doesn't want to be touched, is he committing an offense.

  • Consent is a valid defence to assault causing bodily harm under sec.2, but not sec.3.

  • Apprehension of force.

Explicación