Phil 1104 Exam2

Description

Flashcards on Phil 1104 Exam2, created by Hannah David on 09/04/2015.
Hannah David
Flashcards by Hannah David, updated more than 1 year ago
Hannah David
Created by Hannah David about 9 years ago
21
0

Resource summary

Question Answer
Theory of Utilitarianism One should perform the act that would maximize utility
Natural Law Theory (brief description) *Act is right iff it does not directly violate intrinsic values *Basic good and duties *Ground on Human Nature
Kant's Moral Theory *Act must have good motives *Categorical Imperative
Kant's Categorial Imperative (Universal law formulation) Only act on the maxim through which you can at the same time will that it become a universal law
Maxim Way one would act in a situation
Kant's Test 1. Find maxim 2. Is it possible for everyone to perform this maxim? 3. Can I consistently will that everyone adopt this maxim?
Innocent-but-not-universalizable Maxim is innocent but cannot be applied to everyone Ex: Buy tickets Not universalizable, but not morally wrong
Kant's Categorical Imperative (Formula of the end in itself) Treat humanity as an end in it self, never merely as a means
"as an end" with respect
"as a means" for your own purposes
Kant's first argument for immorality of suicide + Objection "I will end my life out of self-love" Self-love preserve life. Can't have contradictory functions + Yes contradictory - light switch
Kant's second argument for the immorality of suicide + Objection Formula of the end in itself Suicide is merely as a mean (reduce suffering) + By denying one choice, they are being treated as merely a mean Don't force something upon someone
Perfect Duty + Example Completed entirely, blameworthy + Do not commit suicide
Imperfect Duty + Example Never-ending and impossible to fully complete, not blameworthy + Duty to help people (always doing it)
Euthanasia Action of killing someone or letting someone die out of mercy
Active vs Passive Euthanasia Active: taking direction action in ending life Passive: refuse to prevent one's death
Euthanasia - Voluntary - Non-voluntary - Involuntary - want to die - unable to decide - does not want to die
Traditional Doctrine (active vs passive) Active is never okay and passive is sometimes acceptable
Rachels opinion and argument on active vs passive *Active is sometimes morally preferable Passive prolongs suffering. It is wrong to prolong suffering. Active is better
Rachels opinion and example of killing vs letting die + Objection *No moral difference* Smith and Jones - both are bad + Sledgehammer effect: too extreme a case
Sledgehammer effect A factor that usually makes a difference is masked by other factors Ex. Fragility of egg and peanut
Foot Agent of one's death + Examples Intentionally originate the sequence of events leading to the death + Rescue I and Rescue II There is a difference
Foot on MORAL difference of being agent (Rights) *Is a moral difference* Duty to preserve the rights of others to the highest possible degree. I: rights of 5 saved > 1 to be saved Negative duties outweigh positive duties II: right of 5 saved < 1 not be killed
Foot on MORAL difference of being agent (Of the end in itself) II: You treat man in road as "merely as means" to get to the others Morally wrong to do that according to Kants
Objection to Foot Transplant Suregon Treatable guy -Kill for organs (agent) -Don't treat (not agent) No difference
Conditions of Oregon's Death with Dignity Act Competent adult and resident Two doctors say less than 2 months to live Two written requests, 15 days apart, with 2 witness (one not related)
Main argument FOR Oregon PAS Promotes and respect autonomy of human beings by getting choices
Autonomy Person's ability to make decisions for himself and decide what will happen to his own body
Kass's Argument Against PAS + Example *Tragically Self-Contradictory* Destroys autonomy by destroys one's ability to make decisions (because they're dead) + Selling one's self into slavery
Hard-line Libertarian response to Kass (self-contradictory) Maybe it's not so absurd to allow one to selling one's self into slavery If a competent adult wants to?
Gill's response to Kass (self-contradictory) Person is going to die soon anyway therefore destorying autonomy Why not allow meaningful (big) decisions while they still can Respect is letting determine their own fate
Natural Law Theory Objective, value-based, non-consequentialist (more than just outcome)
NLT Intrinsic goods and why are they Life, procreation, social relations, knowledge Because it is human nature to pursue goals
Doctrine of Double Effect Doing harm is worse than allowing harm to occur Act with harm if: - Evil is not out of proportion to the good - impossible to bring about good without evil - evil is not intended (side-effect)
DDE Cases Trolley: let 5 die or throw a switch and kill 1 Large Man: let 5 die or push a man over the bridge and kill him
Show full summary Hide full summary

Similar

Cell Division: Mitosis and Meiosis Lab Quiz
leahc246
Financial Math
Hannah David
Intro to Actuarial Science
Hannah David
Social Construction of Happiness Final
Nicole Berozsky
Photosynthesis and Respiration Quiz
Selam H
Cold War Timeline
jacksearle
Periodicity
hanalou
Input and Output Devices
Jess Peason
AQA Biology 8.1 structure of DNA
Charlotte Hewson
GCSE French - Parts of the Body
Abby B
7 Elements of Good Design
Micheal Heffernan