Forensic Studies - Cognition

Description

Psychology Studies (Forensic Studies) Flashcards on Forensic Studies - Cognition, created by jarmacherkjee on 05/02/2014.
jarmacherkjee
Flashcards by jarmacherkjee, updated more than 1 year ago
jarmacherkjee
Created by jarmacherkjee about 12 years ago
54
1

Resource summary

Question Answer
Yochelson Aim? To examine the criminal thinking patterns which are common in offenders
Yochelson Sample? 255 male offenders, Residents in USA psychiatric hospital, some participants had pleaded guilty for reasons of insanity, 30 completed the programme, 9 changed as a result
Yochelson Method? Interviews, part of a treatment programme, attempted to find the root cause of their criminality (freudian), interviews were standardised
Yochelson Results? Criminals are - restless, irritable, want life of excitement, lack empathy, have distinct and mistaken thinking patterns, have free will
Yochelson Conclusion? 52 distinguishable thinking patterns (errors) in criminal personality, not unique to criminals - no control group
Kohlberg Aim? To find evidence in support of a progression through stages of moral development
Kohlberg Sample? 58 boys, Chicago, Age 7,10,13 and 16
Kohlberg Method? Longitudinal, 2 hour interview - 10 dilemmas to solve (e.g. Heinz dilemma), some boys followed up at 3 yearly intervals up to age 30-36, also studied children in UK, Mexico, Taiwan, Turkey, USA and Yucatan
Kohlberg Results? Younger boys = Stages 1 and 2 Older boys = Stages 3 and 4 Patterns consistent in other cultures, no support for Stage 6
Kohlberg Conclusion? Support for the stage theory Different criminals have different levels of morality Thornton and Reid, 1982 - Suggested that criminals committing crime for financial gain show more immature reasoning than those committing violent crimes
Gudjonsson and Bownes Aim? To examine the relationship between the type of offence and the attributions of blame they made
Gudjonsson and Bownes Sample? 80 criminals, all served sentences in Northern Ireland Group 1 = 20 violent offenders Group 2 = 40 sex offenders Group 3 = 20 property offenders
Gudjonsson and Bownes Method? Questionnaire, 42 item Blame Attribution Inventory, external, mental element and guilt
Gudjonsson and Bownes Results? Sex offenders = more guilt Violent offenders = more external Irish lower mental element and guilt and higher external than English
Gudjonsson and Bownes Conclusion? Supports situational explanation - NI violence because of troubled times BUT sex offenders internal blame = individual explanation
Show full summary Hide full summary

Similar

Rosenhan 1973
Celeste Drouin-Davis
What is Psychology?
lyricchristinaa
Crime studies - Acronyms
melissa.hobbs