Values/principles are regarded as universally valid - apply to
all situations.
Doesn't consider the circumstances/consequences.
RELIGIOUS
ABSOLUTISM
Many have absolutist
positions seen as 'perfect'
and unchanging' e.g TEN
COMMANDMENTS.
Many Christians believe in a
hierarchy of absolutes
(graded absolutism) - duty to
God first, then others, then
property.
STRENGTHS
Provides a fixed ethical code by which to measure
actions.
Can support universal laws - gives us
rules to follow.
Ultimately less violence/conflict.
Protects human rights, values sanctity of life.
WEAKNESSES
Doesn't consider the
situation/consequences/feelings
involved.
Not compassionate
Takes away all elements of
personal decision making.
DEONTOLOGICAL
MORAL RELATIVISM
No universally valid moral principles -
not 'one true' morality.
Circumstances are considered before reaching a
judgement about what is right/wrong.
TELEOLOGICAL
CULTURAL RELATIVISM
Different cultures have different moral codes.
DIVERSITY THESIS
Diversity across cultures means there can't be
'one true' morality.
DESCRIPTIVE RELATIVISM
Different cultures have different ethical systems so
morality is relative.
STRENGTHS
Considers the situation and looks at
consequences.
Promotes tolerance.
Allows progression.
WEAKNESSES
Can justify any action.
Some statements are arguably true
absolutely e.g. 'it is wrong to torture innocent
people'.
May imply that there can't be any real criticism
of events such as the Holocaust.
REASONS FOR RELATIVISM
Decline of religious authority.
Greater understanding of other cultures.
The ancient Greek philosophers Plato and Aristotle believed in a kind of Absolutism or Universalism,
opposing the Moral Relativism of the Sophists. Immanuel Kant was a prominent promoter of Moral
Absolutism