2669847
Description
Mind Map by Carlos Gomez8789, updated more than 1 year ago
|
Created by Carlos Gomez8789
almost 9 years ago
|
|
Effects of Metacognitive Listening Strategy
Training on Listening Comprehension and
Strategy Use...
- Who?
- 54 students: 29 Experimental Group+ 25 Control group
- 54 students: 29 Experimental Group+ 25 Control group
- Where?
- Pre-University Programme CELPAD- Malaysia
- Pre-University Programme CELPAD- Malaysia
- How Long?
- 14 weeks
- 14 weeks
- What?
- Quasi-experimental Research
- Quasi-experimental Research
- Leading Questions
- Is there a difference in learners’
listening comprehension performance
after undergoing a metacognitive
listening strategies training?
- Are there differences in learners’ use of
metacognitive listening strategies
before and after undergoing a
metacognitive listening strategies
training?
- Is there a difference in learners’
listening comprehension performance
after undergoing a metacognitive
listening strategies training?
- Variables
- Independent (The treatment)
- The training in Metacognitive Strategies
- The training in Metacognitive Strategies
- Dependent
- Pre-post test scores in both groups
- Pre-post test scores in both groups
- Independent (The treatment)
- Treatment
- Experienced a metacognitive listening strategy training (MLST)
- Integrated to the same listening classes and same course otline
- Ss were provided a list of metacognitive strategies (what,when,how to use)
- Class Instructions with Pedagogic Cycle
- Regular checklist for Ss focused on pre and after listening
- Experienced a metacognitive listening strategy training (MLST)
- Instruments
- LCT: Listening Comprehension Test: Developed by researcher, validated
- MLSQ: Metacognitive Listening Strategy Questionnaire
- LCT: Listening Comprehension Test: Developed by researcher, validated
- Analysis
- Results from instruments analysed using SPSS
- EDA: Exploratory Data Analysis tool
- Analysis of covariance: ANCOVA
- t-test
- t-test
- EDA: Exploratory Data Analysis tool
- Results from instruments analysed using SPSS
- Resuts
- RQ1
- ANCOVA: No significant difference in
the listening test scores in both groups.
- ANCOVA: No significant difference in
the listening test scores in both groups.
- RQ2
- Significant difference in both groups: ExpG
significantly used more strategies after the
training compared to CtrGr.
- Significant difference in both groups: ExpG
significantly used more strategies after the
training compared to CtrGr.
- RQ1
Want to create your own Mind Maps for free with GoConqr? Learn more.