Unit 10 - Market Abuse, Insider
Dealing, and Fraud Prevention
The avoidance of organisational exposure
to, or involvement, in financial crime is a
priority for all financial services firms.
The reputational, legal and regulatory risks
emanating from financial crimes are significant.
Some types of this crime
are: market abuse (including
insider dealing), fraud, false
accounting, bribery and
corruption, tax evasion.
When this happens under SUP15.3.17R
FCA must be informed
Insider dealing, market manipulation,
misleading statements and market abuse
are all examples of conduct that offends one
of the core objectives of financial services
regulation
Affects stability and integity
white collar crimes’ are NOT
‘victimless crimes’, as they impact on
so many investors & consumers alike
Taking advantage of
others to gain is plainly
wrong,
Market Abuse Directive (MAD)
As a result of MAD, Part VIII of the
UK Financial Services and Markets
Act 2000 (FSMA) was
substantially rewritten.
relates to ‘insider‘ and ‘inside
information‘ ie, insider dealing, misleading
statements, market manipulation
Types of offences
Insider Dealing is an offence that is
committed by anyone who acquires
privileged information and acts upon it.
Misleading statements are creating a false or
misleading impression to the market, so people
make the wrong decision on the back of this
informmaion whether it be dishonest, reckless,
deliberate or otherwise
Any person who does any act or engages
in any course of conduct which creates a
false or misleading impression as to the
market by attempting manipulation
Examples of this are: Barings & Nick Leeson and fraud, Asif Butt – a Compliance Officer
goes to jail for insider info, Shell and the false amount of hydrocarbon reserves it had,
UBS trader Kweku Adoboli, who was alleged to have lost UBS $2 billion in unauthorised
trading
Other types of fraud in Financial services:
Boiler Room Scams, Ponzi Schemes, Wire
transfer fraud schemes, Cheque Fraud,
Credit card fraud, Phishing and vishing,
Identify theft, Securities frauds conducted by
investment businesses,
The Compliance department may not see its primary role as a fraud detection and prevention unit.
Management, however, may expect it to undertake this role. Therefore, this expectations gap needs to be
managed. Compliance may, as a minimum, have to provide an independent assurance on the effectiveness
of the processes put in place by management to manage the risk of fraud.
There is also Bribery and
corruption, False accounting,
cartels and even oligopolies