What others say about Miracles - 3

Description

Views of Wiles, Tillich and Holland on Miracles
Shpat Agushi
Mind Map by Shpat Agushi, updated more than 1 year ago
Shpat Agushi
Created by Shpat Agushi over 10 years ago
9
0

Resource summary

What others say about Miracles - 3
  1. Contingency definition of miracles: Miracles are signs from God; they are events of religious significance. Tillich and Holland.
    1. For example, Jesus curing a person is a sign of God's love for his people.
      1. religious significance=reveals something about God.
      2. HOLLAND
        1. Holland's definition of miracles is the contingency definition of miracles
          1. states that the word 'miracle' is applied to a set of coincidental events that are given religious significance and continue to have this significance after the event.
            1. Holland explains himself with a story of a boy and a train.
              1. Boy playing on the train rail is stuck, and there is a train approaching but can't stop in time, amazingly it stops a few metres away ffrom the boy. Later they find the driver fainted causing the train shut down.
                1. This event is natural but is seen as religiously significant by the mother. So Holland argues that a coincidence can be seen as of religious significance.
                  1. not about laws of nature being violated or God intervening
        2. TILLICH
          1. Tillich supported the contingency definition of miracles and said miracles were sign events
            1. something of religious significance and tells us something about God
              1. comes from miracles in Bible which are signs
                1. Tillich says people care more about event of miracles than its message, and so they overemphasise the event. E.g. Jesus healing a man was a sign from God that he has authority to forgive sins.
                  1. Miracles are astonishing but don't violate laws of nature
                    1. Miracles have religious significance meaning they reveal something about God.
                      1. Also, this revelation of God is what makes experience overwhelming for people.
            2. WILES
              1. Rejected idea of God acting in world and violating laws of nature
                1. According to Wiles, God is the creator and sustainer of the world.
                  1. Believed there was a single miracle of creation and God's creation was good and so it didn't require intervention in the form of miracles.
                    1. Wiles arguments against miracles happening:
                      1. If miracles are violations of laws of nature they would have to be rare
                        1. Pattern of occurrence of miracles is rare
                          1. If God could intervene, then why does he not prevent evil in the world e.g. Holocaust. This would suggest his actions are arbitrary and trivial, so he wouldn't be omnipotent or good.
                            1. If he does intervene, then we don't have free will, so there's no explanation for evil in world except that God allows it to happen.
              Show full summary Hide full summary

              Similar