TO WHAT EXTENT WAS GERMANY
RESPONSIBLE FOR WORLD WAR I?
AGGRESSIVE FOREIGN POLICY
Germany had a PLAN for EUROPEAN DOMINATION
The 1905 Schlieffen Plan can be interpreted as a war of aggression as it entailed potentially unpovoked attacks
on France and Belgium.
The Schlieffen Plan could be regarded as a plan for the possibility of a war on two fronts
From the 1890s Germany followed a policy of Weltpolitik which sought colonial expansion and a more dominant
position in Europe and the world
At the 1912 War Council, the possibility of a future war with Russia was discussed and plans were made to
prepare the public for this eventuality.
Fischer may have placed too much weight on the War Council. It was not attended by Hollweg and little action
occured in response to the meeting.
The War Council may reflect German fears of encirclement rather than an aggressive desire for war. It could be
seen as a response to Britain's declaration that they would support france unconditionanally in the event of war
The 1914 September Programme, written by Hollweg in the early days of the war, outlined Germany's war aims. It
contained a clear indication that Germany sought to subordinate France, and dominate Eastern Europe by
annexing large amounts of territory
Germany was intent on EUROPEAN WAR before 1914
Antagonising RUSSIA
in 1890 the Kaiser allowed the Reinsurance Treaty with Russia to lapse. This treaty was an
agreement not to attack each other. Instead Germany sought closer relations with the
Austro-Hungarian empire
The antagonism that developed between Russia and
Austria made it extremely difficult for Germany to stay on
good terms with Russia and Serbia
In 1908, during the BOSNIAN CRISIS, Germany's support for the Austrian annexation of Bosnia antagonised Serbia, who regarded Austria as
imperialists and their ally Russia. The plan was to inflict a diplomatic humiliation on Russia but it only left them resentful
It could be claimed that Germany was acting due to an increasing fear of encirclement; the Triple Entente was
confirmed the year before. Furthermore Austria-Hungary did not consult Germany initially and Austria antagonised
Russia by threatening them with war
Antagonising FRANCE
FIRST MOROCCAN CRISIS (1905-1906) The Kaiser
demanded an international conference on Frances role in
Morocco, which the French were developing as a colony. He
intervened in a matter in which no vital German interest was at
stake. The Kaiser hoped to isolate France and protect German
economic interests in Morocco. An international conference
(Algeciras, 1906) sided with France allowing it substantial
control of Morocco
SECOND MORROCAN CRISIS (1911) The French suppressed an anti-French uprising in Morocco which led
Germany to argue that the French had exceeded their rights. The Kaiser sent a gunboat as an indication of
support for the rebels. Britain and France regarded German actions as aggressive and Germany was given the
right to control parts of the Congo in return for accepting French influence in Morocco.
Germany also attempted to prise the Russians away from their treaty with the French but this measure failed due
to opposition from the French foreign office. In short the Entente had been strengthened. This whole episode was
humiliating for Germany and the head of the Political office at the Foreign Ministry (Friedrich von Holstein) was
forced to resign. The fear of encirclement of Germany was now very real.
Hilderbrand/Hillgruber/Schollgen: A challenge to
Fischer. The war started because of a sense of
encirclement in Germany, between 1909 and 1914
foreign policy was obsessively focussed on the need
to break this encirclement. The reasons for going to
war were defensive
Antagonising BRITAIN
Germany supported the Boers during the Boer War (1899-1902)
German naval expansion caused tensions. The Second Naval Law in
1900 increased the navy to 38 battleships and further expansion occurred
in 1906, 1908 and 1912. In 1912 Britain tried to negotiate with Germany,
to limit their naval expansion, but to no avail
Britain participated in the naval race and launched the dreadnought
class of warship in 1906. This provoked Germany to expand their navy in
the Third Naval Law (1906). Britain was determined to maintain naval
supremacy. France also contributed to the arms race by expanding her
army.
German actions in the SUMMER of 1914 caused war in Europe
28 June 1914, the heir to the Austrian throne, Archduke Franz Ferdinand, was murdered by Bosnian
associates of the Serbian nationalist Black Hand organisation. Austria blamed Serbia for the assassination.
Germany gave their full support to the Austrians in pursuing a tough line against Serbia and Hollweg urged
the Austrians to take swift military action against the Serbian government. He offered whatever financial and
military assistance required and this unconditional support has been termed the ‘Blank Cheque’. The
Austrians subsequently issued an ultimatum to the Serbians and when the demand, to access Serbia to find
the terrorists, was not met, they declared war on the 28th July.
Austria-Hungary was ultimately responsible for the decision to
go to war and the event that triggered the crisis did not
originate in Germany
It could be argued that when Germany’s leaders issued the ‘blank cheque’ to Austria they mistakenly assumed
that Russia would back down once they knew that they intended to stand by Austria – much as Russia had done
in the 1908-9 Bosnian crisis
Russia, who was allied with Serbia, and who
wanted to prevent Austrian expansion, began to
mobilise her army. Germany demanded a halt to
Russian mobilisation. Russia responded by
ordering a full mobilisation and so on 31st July
Germany declared war on Austria
Russia’s decision to mobilise her army pushed Germany to
enact the Schlieffen plan.
Germany decided to enact the Schlieffen Plan as war with Russia might have meant war with France. Germany declared war on France
when they refused the German demand to stay neutral. Germany demanded that Belgium allow troops to cross their territory. Belgium
refuses, Germany invaded Belgium and Britain, who had an alliance with Belgium, declared war on Germany
Germany only declared war on France when they refused the German demand to remain neutral in the event of a
Russo- German war
Another argument suggested by historians like Pogge von Strandmann, is that Germany did not so much
have a long term plan for war, instead they took a risk on war when the crisis developed in 1914. They
took the chance to escalate the conflict between Austria and Serbia, as they hoped they would gain easy
victories. If a larger conflict developed, the Germans calculated that it was better to have a war sooner
rather than later with the Entente powers, whose military expansion was not yet fully realised.
John Rohl: The war was calculated as the bringing if war through a Balkan crisis would bring three advantages:
Austria- Hungary would not be able to wriggle out of its alliance commitments to Germany; the German population
could be manipulated into believing that they were being attacked by ‘barbarous’ Russia and Britain might be
persuaded to stay out of the wa
ESCAPE FORWARDS
German politicians sought a war in order to resolve domestic difficulties, to
‘escape’ from these problems by pushing forwards with an aggressive war.
This included the growing problem of the SPD, tensions caused by the Zabern
Affair and a budget deficit. The conservative political and military elite sought
to pursue war to strengthen their own position to try and create national unity,
and to distract attention away from the need to reform the political system.
Wehler: The destructive impact of industrialisation caused tensions in Germany’s social and economic structure,
including the tension for constitutional change and social change. These tensions were diverted outwards in order
to maintain the status quo.
Berghahn: War was used as a catalyst to stabilise the monarchy at home
PREVENTATIVE/DEFENSIVE WAR -
encirclement
Germany embarked upon a preventative war because in 1914 German leaders and army chiefs were
fearful of Russia’s growing military power and wanted to eliminate the Russian threat before it was too late.
In 1904 the combined armies of Russia and France outnumbered those of Russia and Germany by
260,000; by 1914 the figure was over 1 million. In the years before 1914 the military spending of the Triple
Entente was much higher than that of the Triple Alliance
SITUATION IN EUROPE (shared guilt)
The principle cause of war was the
‘Realpolitik’ practised by decision
makers in all of the Great Powers. The
basic assumption is that states are
obliged to compete with one another for
survival and thus formed alliances and
built up their armed forces to ensure
their security. The aim was to give rise
to an equilibrium which would ensure
peace. However it produced a flawed
international system as it led to friction,
tension, suspicion and fear and in this
climate Europe stumbled into war.
Germany established the Dual
alliance with Austria in 1879 and
Germany’s continued
commitment owed much to fears
that its collapse would lead to a
power vacuum from which
Russia would benefit. France
desperately needed an ally and
wooed a newly isolated Russia
when Germany did not renew the
Reinsurance treaty. This was a
surprise to Germany and left
them open to a war on two
fronts, especially in 1904 and
1907 when Britain allied
themselves with France and then
Russia respectively
Britain participated in the naval race and launched the dreadnought class
of warship in 1906. This provoked Germany to expand their navy in the
Third Naval Law (1906). Britain was determined to maintain naval
supremacy. France also contributed to the arms race by expanding her
army.
In the 1908 Bosnian crisis Austria-Hungary did not consult Germany initially and Austria antagonised Russia by
threatening them with war
Germany weighed in strongly on Austria’s
side and forced Russia to climb down. This
left them bruised and resentful
Britain was extremely forceful in the Second Moroccan crisis (1911) by warning Germany that they risked war
This started as another attempt by Germany to
break the Anglo-French entente
In 1912 and 1913 in the Balkan Wars countries including Serbia, Montenegro, Greece, Bulgaria
and Romania fought against the Ottoman Empire and among themselves for territorial control of
the Balkan region. This saw the Ottomans largely forced out of Europe and Serbia double in size.
These wars destabilised peace in Europe and did not involve Germany.
Austria-Hungary was ultimately responsible for the decision to go to war and the event that triggered the July
crisis did not originate in Germany. Russia’s decision to mobilise her army pushed Germany to enact the
Schlieffen plan.
Germany’s leaders at the very least knew when they gave the ‘blank cheque’ that there was a serious
risk that general war would result
A variation on this theme is that the Great powers were boxed in by war plans that they had made (war by
timetable). In this situation military considerations began to take priority and army chiefs, desperate not to be
caught in a disadvantage, took control of the crisis. Russia’s generals, knowing it took six weeks to move their
forces into position, pressured a hesitant Tsar into ordering mobilisation as a precautionary measure. Also it was
Germany’s commanders demanded the implementation of the Schlieffen Plan.
1890 was a turning point for German foreign policy as they embarked upon
Weltpolitik which referred to Germany’s aims of building a colonial empire
and transforming itself into a world power. As a result they commenced
naval expansion and the following arms race