Concerned with what people do rather than the consequences
Can be seen as
duty based
Kant rejected the
consequentialist view of ethics.
Categorical Imperative: an absolute and
universal sense of moral duty which directs
humans to the right actions
A priori
(as a self-evident truth)
Kant argued that what makes us human is that
we all have a moral sense.
Something others may call a conscience
We all have the ability to make chioces
The fact that we have a moral sense means we can
choose to do good or evil
God doesn't tell us what to do or control our behaviour
The heart of Kant's moral philosophy is how we
decide whether something is good or not
Problem with trying to decide whether
one's motives are genuine or just
convenient for the moment
Kant developed a simple test to see if something was moral
Universalistaion
If, as humans we all possess a good will, then for
anything to be moral it must be equally applicable
to me as anyone else
(Don't be hypocritical)
Put simply: Duties are duties and there can be no
exceptions
Kant developed two kinds of duty or obligation
Non - moral duty
always introduced but the
word 'if'
Referes to situations which require a very
specific action, for example "if i treat my
customer fairly then it will be good for
trade"
called the HYPOTHETICAL IMPERITIVE
The Categorical Imperative
First version is to apply reason to my wish to do something
and ensure that it is without contradiction and therefore a
moral duty of all humans.
So act that the maxim of your will could
always hold at the same time as a principle
establishing universal law
Maxim: rules which are derived from the categorical imperative
Second version (sometimes called the practical
imperative) expresses what Kant considered to be very
important: treat people as ends in themselves and NOT
means to an end
Finally: act as if you live in a kingdom of ends
Weaknesses of the Categorical Imperative
Kant said that obligation was the reason for acting
morally but doesn't explain why that motive is superior to
emotions such as love and compassion
Applying reason to actions has lead
many to argue for self-interest as a
motive
Doesn't consider
consequences
Strengths of the Categorical Imperative
Straightforward/easy to follow
Intrinsic value of humans
Non-selfish - focuses on the greater good while still thinking
about minorities, unlike utilitarianism which can sometimes
ignore the minorities