How did Henry VII control the nobility?

Description

Again, this is a starting point for your revision and must be used in conjunction with the study guide and the revision powerpoint on the L:Drive in the Yr 12 Tudor folder, in Study Guides
P John
Mind Map by P John, updated more than 1 year ago
P John
Created by P John about 7 years ago
4842
0

Resource summary

How did Henry VII control the nobility?
  1. Use of emerging middle classes and clerical classes
    1. The nobility had been influential under Henry’s predecessors, in guiding policy in exchange for patronage. Henry changed this by giving key positions to a number of the emerging, educated middle classes, thus limiting the power and influence the nobles traditionally had in his court and creating a new generation of royal administrators who owed their position (and loyalty) to him. Eg lawyers like Richard Empson and Edmund Dudley headed Council Learned, mixing with more traditional courtier administrators eg Thomas Lovell, (began his career dressing the king and became head of the Chamber of Finance). He also appointed able clerical administrators to key positions, men like Warham and Foxe were excellent choices to negotiate commercial treaties – this ensured the loyalty of the Church and excellent administration. Don’t forget Henry also had nobility in his government though!
    2. Punishment of the nobility
      1. Henry used Acts of Attainder to punish nobles (ie loss of land and titles if convicted of treason) often revoking them if the noble proved his loyalty (Eg Thomas Howard Earl of Surrey attained in 1485 and put in the Tower because his father fought for Richard at Bosworth. However, he was released in 1489 and put in charge of law and order in the north – he proved his loyalty by suppressing the Yorkshire Rebellion in 1489 but Henry still didn’t give him all his lands back!). In total, Henry issued 138 of these, but 46 were either wholly or partially revoked.
        1. Henry used fines to punish nobles when he couldn’t prove treason – these were called bonds and recognisances where those who offended the king were forced to pay a lump sum of money as security for good behaviour. Eg Lord Dacre was forced into a bond of £2000 for his loyalty in 1506 which Henry could cancel “at his gracious pleasure. Late in his reign, Henry also demanded £40,000 for the candidate to take over the role of Captain of Calais to ensure loyalty towards the end of his reign. During Henry’s reign, 36 noble families out of 62 were tied to Henry under bonds and recognisances (according to historian Professor Lander).
          1. Henry tried to stop the problem of retaining. This was where nobles were allowed to have what amounted to a private army of their own. Retaining was a problem during the Wars of the Roses where overpowerful nobles retained their own forces. Henry tried to get rid of this problem by passing laws to condemn retaining in 1487 and 1506. He couldn’t get rid of it entirely though as he needed armies to quell rebellions. Eg s include the Earl of Devon who in 1494 had to sign a bond for illegally retaining troops – he had to pay up when he was found to be breaking this.
          2. Rewarded the nobility for loyalty
            1. Given the small number of noble families at his disposal (only 60 remained after the WotR), Henry had to trust them with key positions, for example releasing the Earl of Northumberland from the Tower to govern the north in 1489. The Earl of Surrey, a known Yorkist sympathiser took over the Council of the North after Northumberland was murdered. Surrey proved himself to be a loyal servant to the Crown and gradually gained Henry’s trust.
            2. Historians' views on Henry and the nobility
              1. "They (the nobility) needed his (the King's) power, and needed to make it work to protect their own land, an easily damaged commodity, on which their wealth and their power depended" Carpenter
                1. "Though the use of bonds and recognisances was well established at all levels of society during the 15th century, the degree to which Henry drove the system had been unprecedented since the days of King John. His combination of fiscal measures...with his measures in terrorem over a great many people was producing an intense backlash of resentment by the times of his death." E. Arnold
                  1. "Henry's use of B&R was not unusual. Since the time of King John in the dark days of the 1200s they had been used to reflect the monarch's hold on power." Pugh
                    1. "The use of bonds and recognizances was just one part of the King’s relationship with the nobility. Though quite prepared to give responsibility and reward to noblemen he trusted, he gave less wholeheartedly than most previous Kings. Those he trusted from the start, such as Oxford and Derby, never gained complete regional power. Those he never trusted, such as Edward Stafford (Duke of Buckingham), he seemed to frustrate at every turn. This last group were also prominent victims of his financial exactions. Meanwhile great offices which might have been vehicles for noble ambitions were often kept in the King’s hands." S. Gunn
                      1. "Henry VII’s whole reign was a prolonged exercise in deliberately stripping away the independence of the nobility. First he marginalised them, excluding them from offices of the highest importance. The Stanley family, including the King’s step-father, the Earl of Derby, was required to pay heavy bonds as a guarantee of good behaviour. Bonds and Recognizances of this sort proved a highly effective means of weakening mighty subjects and were levied against more than half of England’s nobility. The few nobles who dared to oppose Henry were simply destroyed. Half-forgotten laws – that the nobles had found convenient to ignore when the Crown was weak – were dusted off and used to cripple the great families into absolute submission." Meyer
                        1. "In 1504, Henry required those noblemen that retained men to apply for a license. However, Henry VII never attempted to outlaw retaining entirely as, in the absence of a permanent army, retaining provided him with much needed men in times of crisis. In fact, the problem of maintaining authority had no simple solution and Henry used a variety of moderate methods. The Star Chamber was set up in 1487, but it was impossible to estimate its effectiveness. The Council Learned was involved in drawing up Bonds and Recognizances, in effect keeping a check on the nobility. These were probably the most effective of the instruments which Henry employed to impose order. Yet, these methods were mainly old, established ones." Lockyer
                        Show full summary Hide full summary

                        Similar

                        Hitler and the Nazi Party (1919-23)
                        Adam Collinge
                        GCSE History – Social Impact of the Nazi State in 1945
                        Ben C
                        The Weimar Republic, 1919-1929
                        shann.w
                        3. The Bolshevik's Seizure of Power
                        ShreyaDas
                        Weimar Revision
                        Tom Mitchell
                        History of Medicine: Ancient Ideas
                        James McConnell
                        Conferences of the Cold War
                        Alina A
                        Bay of Pigs Invasion : April 1961
                        Alina A
                        The Berlin Crisis
                        Alina A
                        Using GoConqr to study History
                        Sarah Egan
                        Germany 1918-39
                        Cam Burke