Framers designed federal courts to balance powers of President and
Congress
Federal courts seem to act much more against
congressional power
Growth of presidential power has been reinforced by federal courts - Presidential claims to
powers in foreign policy, war, legislative etc have all been upheld
Only 1% of all court cases in US heard in Federal Courts
Cases heard in federal courts if they involve federal laws,
treaties with other nations or the US Constitution
Also cases in which the US gvt is a party e.g. violating a federal criminal statute such as tax evasion
Federal courts organised by geography - nation into 94 judicial districts
Judicial districts into 11 regional circuits
Each circuit has 1 appellate court to hear appeals
Also federal courts for specific cases e.g. US Court of Int. Trade (customs issues)
Decision of the highest state court can then be appealed to US Supreme Court
Supreme Court NOT obliged to hear the case - only if it believes the matter has national significance
Federal courts are where the powers/limitations of the national gvt are tested
By having power to review decisions of state courts, the federal courts ultimately dominate US judicial system
Types of law cases fall under
Criminal - government charges individual with breaking a statute enacted to protect public health, safety,
morals or welfare
Civil law - disputes between individuals or between individuals and gvt where no criminal violation has occurred
Public law - plaintiffs or defendants in civil/criminal case seek to show their case involves the powers of gvt or rights of citizens
Major part of public law - constitutional law (where court decides if gvt actions conform to Constitution)
Federal System of courts
US District Courts
US Court of Appeals
Request for review
Supreme Court of US
How judges are appointed
President appoints federal judges (inc. Supreme Court judges)
Many were former state judges, prominent attorneys or highly regarded law professors
In general, judges must possess legal experience, good character and similar partisan/ideological views to the president
Constitution requires Senate to "advise and consent" to federal judicial appointments
Gives Congress a check on presidential power over judiciary
Senate Judiciary Committee - considers the potential judge nominated by the president
Confirmed by majority vote in Senate
If president does not have control of Senate, the Senate can block
the president's federal court nominations e.g. Democrats blocked
8/11 of Bush's federal court nominations
Since 1950s judicial appointments have become
increasingly partisan and ideological
Senate Judiciary Committee questions nominees about a wide range of issues from gun control to abortion etc
Danger for court system - courts derive much of their authority from their position of political independence