Confessions and Inferences

R v Condron and Condron

Condron v UK

R v Argent

JSB Direction s.34

s.38(3) on s.34

Condron V UK

R v Beckles

R v Argent

R v Howell (Jeffery John)

R v Petkar - Rix LJ

JSB 2004 Specimen Direction s.34

Condron v UK, s.34 and art 6

Murray v UK

Beckles v UK

R v B - reform of s.34?

Prof Birch on s.34

Lucas Direction

R v Lucas

R v Burgess

R v Stanislas

R v Rana

R v Hacket

Fruits of the poisonous tree

s.34 CJ and Public order act.

article 6 ECHR Right against self-incrimination

s.34(1) Trigger conditions

s.34(2)

s.34(2A)

R v Bowers

R v Webber

Judicial Studies Board Model Direction on s.34

s.82.3

R v Sang

R v Sat-Bhambra

S.76 A PACE

s.76A Rationale

R v Turner and third parties

CJA 2003

Inferences From Silence Rationale

Pace Code C

Judges Rules

s.82(1) PACE

R v Sat-Bhambra-

R v Hasan

s.76(1) PACE.

s.76(2) PACE

R v Dhorajiwala

Burden of Proof

s.76 (2)

s.76(2)(a)

s.76(8)

R v FUlling

R v Mushtaq

R v Heaton

R v Paris, Abdullahi, Miller

R v Davison

S.76(2) (b)

R v Goldenberg

R v Wahab

Judge LJ

R v Delaney

R v Everett

Aim of s.76(2)(b)

R v Bow Street Magistrates ex P Proulx

R v Barry Trussler [1988]-

R v McGovern

R v Roberts

r v Mushtaq

s.78 PACE

R v Alladice

R v Walsh

Code G-

R v Shah

R v Noden

R v Alladice

R v Keenan

Art 6(3)

Murray v UK

Salduz v Turkey

r v Dunford

HM advocate v P