Mindmap
B1 C5: Temperament and Development
Inhalt der Mindmap
B1 C5: Temperament and Development
How is temperament defined?
- 3 main trait theories. All share view that there's a limited set of stable characteristics of which ppl vary
- Eysenk EPI 1981-2 primary traits; introvesion-extraversion, neuroticism-stability + 2 secondary traits- intelligence+psychotisim
- Strongly Nativist- 2 main traits are biological
- Costa &McCrae 1997- OCEAN/Big 5
- Openess to experience. Conscientiousnes. Extraversion. Agreeableness. Neuroticism
- Cattel 1977 -16 PF- personality factor eg. Reasoning, sensitivity, liveliness
- All 3 agree a set of factors exists that can be used as bipolar dimensions to measure ppl
- They all disagree as to what causes these individual dimensions
- Eysenk- biological (nativist). Others experience + genes influence levels of traits
- They all disagree as to what causes these individual dimensions
- Eysenk EPI 1981-2 primary traits; introvesion-extraversion, neuroticism-stability + 2 secondary traits- intelligence+psychotisim
- Seen as different from cognitive abilty. No empirical link between temperament and intelligence
- No generaly accepted consensus on definitition
- 3 main trait theories. All share view that there's a limited set of stable characteristics of which ppl vary
How is temperament measured?
- Interviews with parents:
- Problematic because of bias through social desireability or expectations rather than the actual behaviour, diaries also show bias
- Buss & Plomin EAS Framework
- closely linked to psychometric test construction
- Most common check lists, questionaires
- Diaries, but also show bias
- Interviews with parents:
STABILITY: Is temperament stable over time?
- Adult personality arises from genetic predisposition combined with experience/choices
- Buss & Plomin 1984: meta twins study, high inheritablity
- Critic: Hinde 1989-no obvious cut off for heritability; behaviour can change depending age + enviro
- Plomin et al 1988: Colorado adoption project. Longitudinal showed stability in EAS scores.
- Adult personality might be shaped by temperament + not just experience
- 2 stable temperamental feature dev as C gets older, emerging first at around 12mo
- Behavioural inhibition (Kagan, 1988) the ability infants dev to resist investigating unfamilar things - some become more shy than others
- Effortful control (Rothbart, 1989): the ability to continue doing smthing in order to accomplish a goal without being distracted by nearby stimuli
SITUATIONAL SPECIFICITY: Does temperament affect behaviour across contexts?
- Hinde &Tobin 1986- coherence of temperament in 4yo at home +playgroups.
- Behaviour not the same but temperament seen in different contexts
- found behaviours at home that related to behaviours in the playgroup
- "intense" C behaved broadly the same in both places.
- "Active" C had fewer friendly interactions at home, more hostile to teachers.
- "Shy"- girls tened to have better maternal relationships + much less hostile to school peers. Boys tened to have less good maternal relationships + were more hostile to peers at school than "non-shy" boys.
- "Moodines" at home seemed to relate to ho the C's mum responded to their moodiness, but "moody" C were "just moody" at playgroup
- "Shy"- girls tened to have better maternal relationships + much less hostile to school peers. Boys tened to have less good maternal relationships + were more hostile to peers at school than "non-shy" boys.
- "Active" C had fewer friendly interactions at home, more hostile to teachers.
- "intense" C behaved broadly the same in both places.
- behaviour predictable + dep on age + sex
- Temperament is seens as the set of assosactions between behaviour in diff situations rather than a constant way of behaving
- the quality of interctions with others is a key feature of these contexts
- Temperament is seens as the set of assosactions between behaviour in diff situations rather than a constant way of behaving
- If temperament has a biological basis, then it should be seen consistantly in a variety of setings
- Hinde &Tobin 1986- coherence of temperament in 4yo at home +playgroups.
EMERGENT BEHAVIOURS: Are there changes of features in temperament in development?
- Dunedin Study Caspi et al 1973. 1000 children born 72/3.
- 5 Main types identified at 3yo- well adjusted, under-controlled, confident, inhibited, reserved
- 23 yrs later- 5 personality groups assesed.
- questionaire filled out by friends
- Finidings: 1yo temperament does not correlate to later behaviour.
- 1yo+ temperament is significant influence on behaviour- STABILITY OF DIFF IS ESTABLISHED
- 23 yrs later- 5 personality groups assesed.
- 5 Main types identified at 3yo- well adjusted, under-controlled, confident, inhibited, reserved
- "stability of dev" refers to how variable charac is over long term-
- e,g is the typical C emotional state same at 18mo + 3yo
- "Continuity of dev" describes how stability is ob over long term through diff behaviour
- e.g. crying might induce fear at 18mo, but C might also be able to explain that the feel afraid at 3yo
- Dunedin Study Caspi et al 1973. 1000 children born 72/3.
GOODNESS-OF-FIT(PARENT-CHILD) How are parent child relationships involved in child development?
- Bell Sameroff &Chandler-transactional model. Child produces their own experiences directly
- but also through the influence its behaviour has on its care givers
- Indirect effect via susceptability to psychological diviersity
- e.g hospitalisation of pre-schoolers. But only if they are from poor bkgrd
- Bell Sameroff &Chandler-transactional model. Child produces their own experiences directly
CHARACTER: Are there different types of people?
- Type theories
- Galen: 4 types like hippocrates
- Choleric- easily aroused/angered. Phlematic: cool, detached. Sanguine: excitable, optimistic, impulsive. Melancholic: depressive, pessimistic
- Still used today: Myers- Brigg Type Inventory (MBT)
- Galen: 4 types like hippocrates
- Trait theories
- Bipolar dimensions describe aspects of personality
- Wundt suggested that personality types can be described in terms of levels of traits e.g Sanguine = high excitablity + low changeability
- Implies "type" of person smone is can be worked out by measuring how much they display of each group traits
- the challenge is agreeing on the right set of traits to measure
- A common approach is to use lexical analysis to gather the that ppl use describe others
- use the statistice to methods to id when these mean the same thing
- thus leaving a minimally sufficent subset traits
- use the statistice to methods to id when these mean the same thing
- Traits should be independant
- levels of 1 shouldn't predict levels another. Having more of 1 is not correlated with having "more" or "less" another
- If that happens the 2 are prob the same trait
- However, some may be linked- e.g. high activity + high impulsivity may happen independently
- So not the same thing but often occur together
- However, some may be linked- e.g. high activity + high impulsivity may happen independently
- If that happens the 2 are prob the same trait
- levels of 1 shouldn't predict levels another. Having more of 1 is not correlated with having "more" or "less" another
- A common approach is to use lexical analysis to gather the that ppl use describe others
- Bipolar dimensions describe aspects of personality
- Type theories
2 approaches to dev psy
- Nomothetic (general laws)
- What stages of dev do all kids go through? (stage theories)
- What processes explain how they dev?
- What stages of dev do all kids go through? (stage theories)
- Idiographic (individual differences)
- How do charac such as emotionality vary between adults?
- How can bb temperament explain diff in behaviour + subsequent diff adulthood like personality?
- How do charac such as emotionality vary between adults?
- Nomothetic (general laws)
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- University BK 1 ED209 Mindmap am B1 C5: Temperament and Development, erstellt von Rachael Forde am 13/05/2015.
- Erstellt von
- Rachael Forde
- Aufrufe
- 10
- Bewertung