Mindmap
Fallacies
Inhalt der Mindmap
Fallacies
Guilt by association
- occurs when someone connects an opponent to a demonized group of people or to a bad person in order to discredit his or her argument.
- example: John is a con artist. John has black hair. Therefore, all people with black hair are con artists.
- occurs when someone connects an opponent to a demonized group of people or to a bad person in order to discredit his or her argument.
circumstancial
- Circumstantial fallacy persuades by mimicking our legitimate concerns over conflict of interest. However, arguments are not decisions. A person with a conflict of interest may reason badly (and thus make a bad decision), but his conflict of interest need not influence our assessment of his argument.
- example: A politician claims that it is in the country's best interest to expand oil production. Her opponent claims that she is only saying that because her state benefits from oil production.
- Circumstantial fallacy persuades by mimicking our legitimate concerns over conflict of interest. However, arguments are not decisions. A person with a conflict of interest may reason badly (and thus make a bad decision), but his conflict of interest need not influence our assessment of his argument.
abusive
- The argument attacks a position by appealing to the despicable qualities, moral turpitude, and over-all lowness and meanness of a person who holds the position.
- example: I can't believe that anyone really listens to what the National Rifle Association has to say. After all, they're just a bunch of ignorant yokels.
- The argument attacks a position by appealing to the despicable qualities, moral turpitude, and over-all lowness and meanness of a person who holds the position.
tu quoque
- Claiming the argument is flawed by pointing out that the one making the argument is not acting consistently with the claims of the argument.
- example: Helga: You should not be eating that... it has been scientifically proven that eating fat burgers are no good for your health. Hugh: You eat fat burgers all the time so that can’t be true.
- Claiming the argument is flawed by pointing out that the one making the argument is not acting consistently with the claims of the argument.
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- Mindmap am Fallacies, erstellt von DANIELA ALEJANDRA CANDO MORENO am 21/06/2022.
- Erstellt von
- DANIELA ALEJANDRA CANDO MORENO
- Aufrufe
- 0
- Bewertung
Mehr zu Ad Hominem and Genetic Fallacies