Mindmap
CCNA 3 - Capitulo 7
Inhalt der Mindmap
CCNA 3 - Capitulo 7
WAN CONCEPTS
- PURPOSE OF WANs ?
- WAN TOPOLOGIES LOGICAL
- POINT TO POINT TOPOLOGY
- DEDICATED , LEASED-LINE CONNECTIONS
- COORPORATE EDGE POINT TO THE PROVIDER NETWORKS (ISP)
- LAYER 2 TRANSPORT SERVICES
- THROUGH THE SERVICE PROVIDER NETWORK
- POINT TO POINT CIRCUITO BETWEEN TWO ENDPOINTS
- IS TRANPARENT TO THE CUSTOMER
- IT SEEMS AS IF HERE IS A DIRECT PHYSICAL LINK BETWEEN TWO ENDPOINTS
- DEDICATED , LEASED-LINE CONNECTIONS
- HUB AND SPOKE TOPOLOGY
- ENABLES A SINGLE INTERFACE ON THE HUB ROUTER TO BE SHARED BY ALL SPOKES CIRCUITS
- SPOKES ROUTERS CAN BE INTERCONNECTED THROUGH THE HUB ROUTER
- VIRTUAL CIRCUITS AND ROUTED SUBINTERFACES
- SINGLE HOME TOPOLOGY
- REPRESENT A SINGLE POINT OF FAILURE
- DUAL HOMED TOPOLOGY
- ADVANTAGE
- REDUNDANCY ; LOAD BALANCING ; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING AND PROCESSING
- DISADVANTAGE
- MORE EXPENSIVE TO IMPLEMENT BECAUSE REQUIRE ADDITIONAL NETWORK HARDWARE SUCH ROUTERS , SWITCHES
- DIFFICULT IMPLEMENT BECAUSE REQUIRE ADDITIONAL AND MORE COMPLEX CONFIGURATIONS
- PROVIDES REDUNDACY
- ADVANTAGE
- FULL MESHED TOPOLOGY
- THIS IS THE MOST FAULT TOLERANCE TOPOLOGY
- CONNECT ALL SITES
- MULTIPLE VIRTUAL CIRCUITS
- PARTIALLY MESHED TOPOLOGY
- CONNECTS MANY , BUT NOT ALL SITES
- LARGER NETWORS DEPLOY A COMBINATION OF THESE TOPOLOGIES
- POINT TO POINT TOPOLOGY
- LAN X WAN
- LOCAL AREA NETWORK (LANs)
- SMALL GEOGRAPHIC
- CAMPUS NETWORK
- HOME NETWORK
- OFFICE NETWORK
- BUILDING NETWORK
- IS NO FEE
- MANAGED
- ORGANIZATION OR HOME USER
- HIGH BANDWIDTH
- ETHERNET AND Wi-Fi
- INTERCONNECT LOCAL COMPUTERS , PERIPHERALS AND OTHER DEVICES
- SMALL GEOGRAPHIC
- WIDE ARE NETWORK (WANs)
- LARGER GEOGRAPHICAL
- BETWEEN CITIES CONTRIES , CONTINENTALS
- PROVIDE FOR A FEE
- INTERCONNECT ENTERPRISE CAMPUS TO REMOTE LANs AT BRANCH SITES ... REMOTE USERS
- IS A TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK
- OPERATE BOYOND THE GEOGRAPGIC SCOPE OF A LAN
- LOW BANDWIDTH
- LARGER GEOGRAPHICAL
- LOCAL AREA NETWORK (LANs)
- CARRIER CONNECTIONS
- DUAL CARRIER WAN CONNECTION
- ORGANIZATION CONNECTS TO TWO SERVICE PROVIDER
- ADVANTAGE
- HIGH REDUNDANCY
- CAN BE USED FOR REDUNDACY OR LOAD BALANCE TRAFFIC
- NETWORK AVAILABILITY
- SLAs SEPARETE WITH TWO SERVICE PROVIDERS
- HIGH REDUNDANCY
- CAUTION : THE ORGANIZATION SHOULD ENSURE THAT THE TWO PROVIDERS EACH USE A DIFFERENT CARRIER
- SINGLE CARRIER WAN CONNECTION
- ORGANIZATION CONNECTS TO ONLY ONE SERVICE PROVIDER
- DISADVANTAGE
- BOTH SINGLE POINTS OF FAILURE
- DESIGN IS HOW AN ORGANIZATION CONNECTS TO THE NETWORK
- ORGANIZATION USUALLY SIGNs A SLA (SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT) WITH A ISP
- THIS PROVIDES EXPECTED SERVICES AND RELIABILIY AND AVAILABILITY THE CONNECTION
- THE SERVICE PROVIDER MAY OR NO MAY ACTUAL CARRIER
- ISP IS THE REAL CARRIER:
- THE SAME COMPANY OWNS THE PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE
- (FIBER, BACKBONE, EQUIPMENT).
- THE SAME COMPANY OWNS THE PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE
- ISP IS NOT THE REAL CARRIER:
- THE ISP SELLS THE INTERNET SERVICE.
- A DIFFERENT COMPANY (CARRIER) OWNS AND MAINTAINS THE PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE.
- ISP IS THE REAL CARRIER:
- DUAL CARRIER WAN CONNECTION
- WAN TOPOLOGIES LOGICAL
- PURPOSE OF WANs ?
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- Tecnologias Educacionais Redes de Computadores - CCNA R&S (CCNA: Enterprise Networking, Security, and Automation) Mindmap am CCNA 3 - Capitulo 7, erstellt von Vinicius C. am 14/06/2024.
- Erstellt von
- Vinicius C.
- Aufrufe
- 1
- Bewertung