GoConqr hat ein neues Design! Sag uns, wie es dir gefällt.

Mindmap

Privity

Kieran Deaville [First Year] Contract Law Undergraduate Englisch

Inhalt der Mindmap

Privity

  1. Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co v Selfridges & Co = 'Only a person who is a party to a contract can sue on it'

  2. Has 2 aspects to it:

    • Who are the parties to the agreement?
    • Has the claimant provided consideration?
  3. Collateral Contracts

    • Shanklin Pier v Detel Products = Consideration was the instruction given by the claimants to their contractors
    • Contract between 2 persons (A and B) may be accompanied by a collateral contract between one of them ( eg B) and a 3rd party.
    • Independent Authority v EMI Electronics = Promise won't amount to a collateral contract unless an intention established
  4. Clarke v Dunraven = Where group of people join a club/competition, may deemed to be entering into a contract with all other members to abide by rules of club/competition

  5. Consideration Component

    • 1. Tweddle v Atkinson = Consideration must move from promisee
    • 2. Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co v Selfridge & Co = Claimant must show promise was made to him & consideration moved to him
  6. Justifications for Privity

    • Tweddle v Atkinson = Doctrine rests on principle of mutuality e.g. unfair to allow a person to sue a contract where that person cannot be sued by the other
    • Re Schedsman = Undesirable for 3rd party rights to be created by a contract. Restricting rights to amend/rescind their agreement
    • Third-party beneficiaries are gratuitous recipients of the benefit in their favour
  7. Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act

    • S.1 (1) - A person who is not a party to a contract may enforce a term if test of enforceability is satisfied
    • 2 ways in which the test of enforceability can be satisfied:
      • 1. S.1 (1) a - Contract expressly states that a 3rd party has right to enforce provision
      • 2. S.1 a & b - 3rd Party can enforce if expressly identified in contract & the term purports to confer a benefit on that third party
        • Dolphin & Maritime & Aviation Services v The Swedish Club = Won't apply in the construction of contract where parties didn't intend term to be enforceable by the 3rd party
          • Nisshin Shipping Co v Cleaves & Co = Burden on promisor to rebut presumption

Informationen

Beschreibung
Undergraduate [First Year] Contract Law Mindmap am Privity, erstellt von Kieran Deaville am 17/12/2017.
Erstellt von
Kieran Deaville
Aufrufe
2
Bewertung

Feedback

Worum geht es?

Wie gefällt dir das neue Design?

Dein Eindruck