Mindmap
Imputation
Inhalt der Mindmap
Imputation
Patterns of Missingness
- MAR
- missing does not depend on missing value
- depends on other characteristics
- doesn't matter too much
- people live alone, just have been missed by interviewer
- NMAR
- Hard to predict
- working people- harder to get to, are out a lot
- No info else where about what value should be
- NO GENERAL SOLUTION
- certain characteristics less likely to respond
- lead to bias
- MAR
Non-response
- levels
- Unit
- item
- Occur at:
- Household
- Individual
- item
- Deal
- Do nothing
- Inconsistent estimates between analysts
- Different assumptions
- treat as missing data based on incomplete information
- Adjust weights
- at different levels
- post-stratification
- reduce or increase bias
- difficult to ensure consistency for ad-hoc tests
- Imputation
- create internally consistent records
- most feasible for NR
- preferable
- preserves relationship between variables
- reduce NR data
- increase complexity of variance
- Do nothing
- levels
How to choose
- unknown rules
- data is homogeneous
- levels of erroneous/ missing data
- kind of missingness
- auxiliary variables
- kind of analysis
- timing or constraints
- Run imputation study
- create clean complete dataset
- model NR patterns
- make 'holes' to simulate missingness
- find best method
- run multiple times
- measure
Methods
- Stochastic and Deterministic
- Stochastic
- Better Statistically, different results each time
- data taken from random respondant
- better for distribution
- less for M M M
- examples
- from randomly selected case
- random regression
- random donor
- Deterministic
- same imputation every time
- suitable when estimating certain types of aggregates
- may not preserve shape of distribution
- not suitable for estimating distribution parameters
- underestimates variance if standard methods are used
- examples
- Deductive
- based on logical relationships between variables
- completed anytime
- derived from edit rules
- Example: LFS- 'child' < 16
- mean, median or mode
- Get more peaks
- more with same value
- estimation goes down
- equivalent to applying same weight to everyone
- reasonable totals
- no distributions
- last resort
- Get more peaks
- apply ratio
- donor methods
- Deductive
- Stochastic
- Ratio / Logistic
- regression
- y approx linear to x
- impute missing y with:
- ratio of means
- means of ratio
- trimming and weighting
- R is sensitive to outliers
- more robust R
- trimming:removes top and bottom
- Weighting: combines two growths,
- R=wRt+(1-w)Rt-1
- w = 0.8
- regression
- Donor Imputation
- Hot deck
- common way to find donor
- deck of completed
- choice at ranodm
- sequential
- order responses
- donor is most recent
- PROBLEMS
- too few
- limited control
- too many classes
- multiple use of donor
- Hierarchical
- sorted by class
- match as many variables as possible
- preferable but less efficient
- Nearest neighbour
- set of donors with similar characteristics
- calculate distance
- choose at random from k smallest (k=5)
- each variable given a weight
- uses values from fully returned records
- needs large pools of donors
- each donor only once
- preserves population distribution
- usually stochastic
- Hot deck
- Stochastic and Deterministic
Concept of Classes
- WHEN MAR
- can use dependence:
- partition samples into classes
- finds similar respondent to impute
- classes:
- equivalent to weighting
- parameters of interest: domains, means or totals
- social surveys use regression
- CHAID
- classification rule to split data, non overlapping
- predefined rules
- repeatedly splitting data into more subsets
- Continuous until criteria is met
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- Mindmap am Imputation, erstellt von Rhianna Chell am 13/05/2015.
- Erstellt von
- Rhianna Chell
- Aufrufe
- 1
- Bewertung