Mindmap
3 approaches to arguments!_1
Inhalt der Mindmap
3 approaches to arguments!_1
The Rogarian Approach
- Created by Carl Rodgers, Psychologist
- This approach stated that people can only resolve an argument through "common ground"
- Introduction: States the problem and key background information
- A neutral, non-judgemental statement of the opponent's position: Allowing you to demonstrate your knowledge of your opponent's position
- A neutral statement of your position
- An analysis of the two claims: to find "common ground"
- A Final proposal that suggests a compromise between the two claims
- This approach stated that people can only resolve an argument through "common ground"
- Created by Carl Rodgers, Psychologist
The Tomlin Approach
- Created by Stephen Tomlin, an English philosopher and logician
- Created six different category for which an argument could be analyzed
- Claim: A statement you are arguing that you want the audience to accept.
- Backing: Additional information that fits in with the Grounds and helps confirm the warrant
- Warrant: Linking the grounds to the claim, to strengthen your claim. Can be based on Ethos, Logos, Pathos.
- Rebuttal: The chance to discredit any arguments that may oppose the initial claim
- Qualifier: Giving evidence that the claim may in fact not be true or correctly fitting to the background
- Grounds: Background info paired with hard facts to state the "ground" for the claim to stand on.
- Created six different category for which an argument could be analyzed
- Created by Stephen Tomlin, an English philosopher and logician
The Classical Appproach
- Developed in the 5th century B.C. by Greek Philosophers
- Easily understood by the audience
- Based on "Formal Logic." Otherwise known as Syllogism
- Syllogism:
- A basic reasoning technique using deductive arguments in which a conclusion is based off of two premises
- Deductive: Reasoning based from general premises leading to specific premises
- Deductive Vs. Inductive
- Inductive: Reasoning based off of specific premises that can infer larger, general premises
- Example:
- All people have hearts
- John is a person
- Therefore, John has a heart.
- John is a person
- All people have hearts
- A basic reasoning technique using deductive arguments in which a conclusion is based off of two premises
- The Classical Approach is Heavily based on 6 main commponents
- Introduction: Let's the Audience know who you are and any credibility you have to offer
- Statement Background: States important background information that leads up to your claim
- Proposition: Your claim. States the position your taking based on the background information.
- Refutation: Anticipates the opposite claims only to refuse them, and show why your solution is the greatest.
- Conclusion: Sums up all your important points, and a good place to appeal to your emotions and feelings on the subject.
- Refutation: Anticipates the opposite claims only to refuse them, and show why your solution is the greatest.
- Proposition: Your claim. States the position your taking based on the background information.
- Statement Background: States important background information that leads up to your claim
- Introduction: Let's the Audience know who you are and any credibility you have to offer
- Syllogism:
- Based on "Formal Logic." Otherwise known as Syllogism
- Easily understood by the audience
- Developed in the 5th century B.C. by Greek Philosophers
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- Mindmap am 3 approaches to arguments!_1, erstellt von 2010804 am 06/06/2015.
- Erstellt von
- 2010804
- Aufrufe
- 0
- Verlauf
-
- Erstellt von 2010804 · 6 Jun 2015
- Kopiert von 2010804 · 6 Jun 2015
- Bewertung