Mindmap
Moral Development
Inhalt der Mindmap
Moral Development
Morality: Biological perspective
- rooted in human nature
- reciprocity and exchange
- empathy and self-sacrifice
- biased to help family members - continue bloodline
- investing time and effort for own people
- originated from hunter & gatherer societies
- BRAIN AREAS
- PFC - ventromedial area
- orbitofrontal cortex
Milller & Bersoff: What should Ben do?
- conflict between personal responsibility and responsibility to society
Morality: Societal Norms perspective
- Child's characteristics
- Parent characteristics
- Parental style of discipline
- Child's view of misdeed and reasonableness of parental demands
- internalization of societal standards
Emotions drive behaviour
- ROLE OF GUILT
- not the only motivation for moral behaviour tho!
- guilt leads us to make amends, repair damage from our actions
- ROLE OF GUILT
INDUCTIvE DISCIPLINE
- OR harsh discipline
- OR love withdrawal
- induction: adult helps child notice others' feelings and effects of their own msbehaviour
- providing reasonable and appropriate explanations
PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORY (GUILT)
- form superego by conscience
- want to sexually possess opposite-sex parent
- fear of being destroyed by opposite-sex parent channeled into superego
- leads to conformity to societal rules/moral behaviour
- internalize rules out of fear and protection of oursevles
Morality: Behaviourism
- we do RIGHT becuz we're REWARDED for it
- we do WRONG becuz we're PUNISHED for it
- reinforcement/punishment must be learnt over time
- some behaviours we avoid even tho we've never done it before!
- some engage in moral behaviour despite great personal risk
EFFECTS OF PUNISHMENT
- to foster long-term goals - better to use warm but firm way of discipline
- harsh and violent punishment only makes it more likely child will do it again
- Spanking: only modelling aggression!
- frequency and severity of punishment can ESCALATE over time
- transmit cross-generations
- often higher for low SES families
- African-Americans see corporal punishment differently
- children see it as parent caring for them
- it's for your own good rather than personal act of aggression
SOCIAL LEARNING THEORY
- children learn thru modelling
- 3 aspects of models most likely to be modelled
- Warm, responsiveness
- Competence & power
- Consistency between assertions & behaviour
- models most influential in early years
ALTERNATIVES to punishment
- warm parent-child relationship
- consistency
- explanations
- Some cases: direct violation of norms is good!
- parents are not always right!
Morality: Cognitive-Developmental
- Heteronomous morality (5-8 yrs)
- see rules as handed down to them by supreme authority (adults)
- rules are ABSOLUTE
- Morality of cooperation (9-10 yrs)
- see rules as flexible rather than fixed
- settle conflicts in mutually beneficial ways
- ideal reciprocity
- children capable of seeing ppl's intentions as bad based on their behaviour
- focus on punishment, consequences, concrete things
- Heteronomous morality (5-8 yrs)
HEINZ DILEMMA
- man wants to save wife dying from cancer
- druggist refuses to sell drugs to him for cheaper and won't let man pay him back later
- Man tries all other methods of raising money but no time
- desperate - he breaks into drug store and steals drug to save his wife
- WAS IT RIGHT OF HIM TO DO IT?
KOHLBERG'S STAGES
- Preconventional level
- 1. Punishment & obedience
- 2. Naive-hedonistic
- Conventional level
- 3. Good boy good girl
- 4. Social order maintaining
- Postconventional level
- 5. Social contract/legalistic
- 6. Self-chosen ethical principles
- ppl also use other strategies
- relying on institution
- talking with others
- religious beliefs
- Influences
- cognitive maturity
- perspective-taking
- reorganization of thought
- Challenges to Kohlberg's theory
- Pragmatic approach - each person makes moral judgments on varying levels of maturity
- Alot of ppl just act first then apply moral judgments later
- some use moral judgments for immoral purposes
- Preconventional level
Moral dumbfounding
- feels smth is wrong but can't explain why
SEX DIFFERENCES IN MORALITY
- Carol Gilligan argued Kohlberg underestimated girls' morality
- girls - more sensitive, caring - more likely to have higher morality
- most research do NOT support her claims however
Influences of Moral Reasoning
- Personality
- Culture
- Childrearing practices
- Peer interaction
- Schooling
- Moral Reasoning & Behavour
- Reasoning doesn't always translate to behaviour!
- More likely to take action if moral goals are personally relevant to us
- parenting strategies: launch conscience development + empathy early on
- Fear learning environments
RELIGIOUS INVOLVEMENT
- those involved in religious communities have more opportunity to get involved in community services
- lower levels of drug/alcohol abuse
- EXCEPTION: religious cults
Morality: Domain approach
- Moral vs Social Conventional
- know that breaking rules in moral domain is more serious than in social conventional
- Relation of Personal & Moral domains
- reach adolescence: increasingly don't want parents to interfere with personal domain
- personal choice enhances moral understanding
- Personal choices in social conventional domain can have MORAL consequences
- Enter text here
- Moral vs Social Conventional
SELF-CONTROL
- inhibiting urges that violate moral rules
- resistance to temptation
- COMPLIANCE
- DELAY OF GRATIFICATION
- Walter Mischel experiment
- 10 mini marshmallows later OR 2 mini marshmallows now
AGGRESSION
- PHSYICAL
- VERBAL
- RELATIONAL
- Early & Middle Childhood
- physical aggression gives way to verbal
- girls use relational tactics
- Adolescence
- rise in delinquency
- rise in autonomy desires
- SES and ethnicity = strong predictors of arrests
- STABILITY of aggression
- Kindergarteners - high, moderate, low levels determine stability of aggression in later years
- childrearing
- SES, environment, conflict-ridden
- FAMILY & AGGRESSION
- Family = training ground for aggression (becomes vicious cycle)
- 1) coercive parental discipline
- 2) Coercive give + take between parent and child
- 3) Long-term consequences
- 4) Conflict resolution
- Social-cog deficits
- overly high self-esteem
- cog distortion techniques to validate bad behaviour
- Community & Cultural Influences
- poverty-stricken neighbourhoods
- high adult criminality
- ethnic + political prejudices
- INTERVENTIONS
- parent training
- social-cog interventions
- pay more attention to social cues
- zero tolerance policies
- comprehensive approaches
- eg EQUIP
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- Mindmap am Moral Development, erstellt von Helen Li am 11/12/2013.
- Erstellt von
- Helen Li
- Aufrufe
- 40
- Bewertung