Zusammenfassung der Ressource
PARTICIPANT OBSERVATION
- TYPES OF OBSERV.
- Non-pariticipant Observ. =
the researcher observes
the group or event without
taking part in it.
- Participant Observ. = the
researcher actually takes
part in the event or the
everyday life of the group
while observing it.
- Overt Observ. = the
researcher reveals
their true identity and
purpose known to
those being studied.
- Covert Observ. =
the researchers
real identity is
kept concealed
from the group
being studied.
The researcher
takes on a false
identity and role.
- ADV. OF PO
- THEORETICAL
- VALIDITY- higher validity than
questionnaires.Observing allows
researcher to gain a true picture of
how the group really live .
- INSIGHT- PO allows the
researcher to gain insight and
verstehen (German word for
empathy) into the groups way of
life through personal experience.
- FLEXIBILITY- doesn't have set
questions,like questionnaires.
Allows researcher to enter the
situation with an open mind of
what they will find out
- PRACTICAL
- Good method to study
groups that society see as
deviant.E.G.a teenage gang
would expect researchers
who come asking questions.
- The ability to build a
rapport and gain trust
makes it a successful
method for studying
outsider groups E.G.
thieves, drug users etc
- Good method in situations where
questioning is ineffective E.G.
racism
- DIS ADV. OF PO
- PRACTICAL
- Time consuming.
- Requires observational and
impersonal skills and personal
characteristics depending on
the study that not everyone
posses.
- ETHICAL
- COVERT Participant observation
can be accused of deceiving
people in order to obtain
information.
- Some sociologists may result
in participating in illegal or
immoral activities during their
search. E.G. whilst
participating in a study of
thieves.
- IINFORMED CONSENT- research
participants should be offered the right to
refuse. They should aslso be fully
informed about the aspects of the
research
- THEORETICAL
- REPRESENTATIVENESS- PO are of
a small sample and is often selected
by a chance encounter. This does not
provide a basis for making
generalisations
- RELIABILITY- it isn't possible
for the observation to be
repeated exactly the same,or
even similarly, as the original
one because it is not
structured
- 'Going Native' = becoming
over-involved with the group and
loosing your objectivity.
- VALIDITY- positivists
argue that the findings
are merely biased
impressions of the
observer.
- THE HAWTHORNE EFFECT= when the
subjects of a research know they are being
studied and change their behaviour as a result,
undermining the validity