NEW RIGHT SUPPORTERS (PAUL WILDING + VIC GEORGE) -

welfare state took service user out of driving seat in their journey of care
Beveridge supporters felt it was unethical to consider those needing care as consumers who had the ability and knowledege to exercise a choice over thier own health care
NR embraced principle of a care/free market. They argued that by implementing welfare state labour g'ment failed to pay attention to the economy and ignored costs (need to implement prescription charges)
Beveridge supporters argued that encouraging outsourcing would = a decline in care standards as wrkers wld be paid less for a demanding job. Care wrk would be pushed back onto shoulders of carers
NR felt that NHS failed to tackle disease but infact created more as peopel used the NHS because it was free and available, also people living longer increased no. needing pensions
Beverifdge aimed to comabt squalor thro intro of 1946 housing act which increased funding thro local g'ments
NR housing act 1985 decreased tennants rights and housing benefit
Beveridge felt that inorder to irradicate want there shld be flat rate of benefit avaliable to all
NR 1986 Social Security Act which made changes to the benefirts system, people were no longer given grants in timwe of need but loans which had to be re paid

	Erstellt von Jen Collins vor etwa 11 Jahre

EXAM QUESTIONS Notiz am compare + contrast nwe right critique of welfare state and the 5 giants, erstellt von Jen Collins am 31/05/2013.