Quiz
Laws101
Dieses Quiz enthält Fragetypen, die sich im gewohnten Player öffnen.
Fragen in diesem Quiz (23)
1Finder has rights to keep an item against all but the true owner
- AArmory v Delamirie
- BBridges v Hawkesworth
- CSouth Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman
- DHannah v Peel
- EParker v British Airways
- FTamworth Industries v Attorney General
2Trespassers are excluded finders rights
- AArmory v Delamirie
- BBridges v Hawkesworth
- CSouth Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman
- DHannah v Peel
- EParker v British Airways
- FTamworth Industries v Attorney General
3Finders obligation toward finding the true owner
- AArmory v Delamirie
- BBridges v Hawkesworth
- CSouth Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman
- DHannah v Peel
- EParker v British Airways
- FTamworth Industries v Attorney General
4Finder has to take item under their care and control
- AArmory v Delamirie
- BBridges v Hawkesworth
- CSouth Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman
- DHannah v Peel
- EParker v British Airways
- FTamworth Industries v Attorney General
5The item must be lost
- AArmory v Delamirie
- BBridges v Hawkesworth
- CSouth Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman
- DHannah v Peel
- EParker v British Airways
- FTamworth Industries v Attorney General
6Employees act as an agent of their employer
- AArmory v Delamirie
- BBridges v Hawkesworth
- CSouth Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman
- DHannah v Peel
- EParker v British Airways
- FTamworth Industries v Attorney General
7Occupiers have a potential claim to lost items
- AArmory v Delamirie
- BBridges v Hawkesworth
- CSouth Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman
- DHannah v Peel
- EParker v British Airways
- FTamworth Industries v Attorney General
8Occupiers have an obligation to take measures to find the true owner
- AArmory v Delamirie
- BBridges v Hawkesworth
- CSouth Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman
- DHannah v Peel
- EParker v British Airways
- FTamworth Industries v Attorney General
9Occupiers cannot claim finders rights if the item was handed in
- AArmory v Delamirie
- BBridges v Hawkesworth
- CSouth Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman
- DHannah v Peel
- EParker v British Airways
- FTamworth Industries v Attorney General
10Intention to control must be manifest
- AArmory v Delamirie
- BBridges v Hawkesworth
- CSouth Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman
- DHannah v Peel
- EParker v British Airways
- FTamworth Industries v Attorney General
11Advertising the item fulfils finder's obligations
- AArmory v Delamirie
- BBridges v Hawkesworth
- CSouth Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman
- DHannah v Peel
- EParker v British Airways
- FTamworth Industries v Attorney General
12Notifying the police fulfils the finder's obligations
- AArmory v Delamirie
- BBridges v Hawkesworth
- CSouth Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman
- DHannah v Peel
- EParker v British Airways
- FTamworth Industries v Attorney General
13If it is not attached to the property it is not part of the property
- AArmory v Delamirie
- BBridges v Hawkesworth
- CSouth Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman
- DHannah v Peel
- EParker v British Airways
- FTamworth Industries v Attorney General
14If the owner of the property had no knowledge of the item, then it removes occupiers rights.
- AArmory v Delamirie
- BBridges v Hawkesworth
- CSouth Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman
- DHannah v Peel
- EParker v British Airways
- FTamworth Industries v Attorney General
15Armory v Delamirie ([blank_start]1722[blank_end])
Bridges v Hawkesworth ([blank_start]1851[blank_end])
South Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman ([blank_start]1896[blank_end])
Hannah v Peel ([blank_start]1945[blank_end])
Parker v British Airways ([blank_start]1982[blank_end])
Tamworth Industries v Attorney General ([blank_start]1991[blank_end])- A1722
- B1851
- C1896
- D1945
- E1982
- F1991
- G1992
- H1856
- I1748
- J1845
- K1986
16Armory v Delamirie
- AEichelbaum CJ
- BBirkett J
- CPratt CJ
17Bridges v Hawkesworth
- APatteson J
- BPratt CJ
- CDonaldson LJ
- DEveleigh LJ
18Lord Russell of Killowen
- AArmory v Delamirie
- BBridges v Hawkesworth
- CSouth Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman
- DParker v British Airways
- ETamworth Industries v Attorney General
19Hannah v Peel
- ABirkett J
- BEichelbaum CJ
- CPratt CJ
- DDavid Cairns
20Parker v British Airways
- ADonaldson LJ
- BPatteson J
- CEichelbaum CJ
21Eichelbaum CJ
- AParker v British Airways
- BTamworth Industries v Attorney General
- CArmory v Delamirie
- DSouth Staffordshire Water Company v Sharman
- EBridges v Hawkesworth
- FHannah v Peel
22Rights derived from true owner superior to finder and occupier -
[blank_start]Moffatt[blank_end] v [blank_start]Kazana[blank_end] [1968]- AMoffatt
- BKazana
23If things are found in the course of employment or agency, must account to principal.
- City of London v [blank_start]Appleyard[blank_end] [1963]- AAppleyard
Informationen
- Beschreibung
- Quiz am Laws101, erstellt von Caitlin Buchanan am 19/09/2017.
- Autor
- Caitlin Buchanan
- Sprache
- English
- Aufrufe
- 5
- Bewertung
- Noch keine Bewertungen Bewerte dieses Quiz