GoConqr hat ein neues Design! Sag uns, wie es dir gefällt.

Folien

Econ Develop. Countries Exam 1

Samuel Jean Business/Economics Englisch 7 Folien

Folien in diesem Satz (7)

  1. The Economic Lives of the Poor

    • Author Abhijit Banerjee
    • India
    • 13 countries
    • Living standards Measurement surveys
    • Large Findings:
    • Poor can still make purchasing decisions
    • Problems?
    • trouble identifying poor (price differences)
    • purchasing power, exchange rates do not prove poverty line, reporting periods vary
  2. Many Children Left Behind? Textbooks and Test scores in kenya

    • Authors: Glewwe, Paul, Michael Kremer and Sylvie Moulin
    • School assistance program (SAP):
    • year 1 : 25 schools get textbooks - 75 do not (control)
    • year 2: 25 schools get textbooks 25 get grant and 25 control
    • researchers administer standardized tests to compare across groups
    • Results:
    • Control for everything
    • Textbooks do not have an effect
    • Randomization is important - seems like textbooks would helps but there is an omitted variable
    • OVB possibilities - Language Barrier, bad textbooks
    • only program impact group - best students did better with textbooks
  3. Causal Effect of Health on Labor Market Outcomes (Experimental Evidence

    • H : strong positive association between health and economic prosperity (Healthier workers less susceptible to disease and are more productive)
    • Causal effect of Iron deficiency on economic success (Adults):
    • Experimental groups receives iron supplement, control receives placebo
    • labor market outcomes compared for next 6 months
    • Results: support hypothesis, productivity increases in experiment group, increased work capacity (bike)
    • Benefits much more muted in woman than in men
    • Potential issues:
    • potential selection in attrition (non-random attrition
    • Sharing doses with family
    • Difficulty detecting/measuring effects in some fields
    • Overall: evidence effects (somewhat small), great example of carefully run large sample experiment
  4. Free Distribution or Cost sharing? evidence from a randomized Malaria Prevention Exeriment

    • Author; Jessica Cohen and Pascaline Dupas
    • Health product demand is price sensitive (price: up demand: down)
    • Sunk cost effect: perceived value of product is from price
    • Pregnant women targeted (do they want a bed net offered at different prices to randomly assess how it is valued
    • If you came and showed money for the net you were offered a lower price in an envelope (either same or reduced price)
    • Groups:
    • 1. Women that would pay higher price and did
    • 2. Women that would pay a high price but paid low
    • 3 Women that would pay a low price and did
    • Group 1 vs Group 2 measures sunk cost
    • Group 1 vs Group 3 combined effect
    • Both effects found to be zero selection assumed to be zero
    • 3 important results
    • Demand Curve is steep
    • Usage is no lower when price is lower
    • no evidence of selection effet or sunk cost effect charging a small positive price is bad, people do not value the good
  5. Schooling and labor Market Consequences of School Construction in Indonesia

    • Author: Esther Duflo
    • Constructing Primary Schools: INPRES program built schools
    • Govt recruits teachers and pays their salaries (teacher/student ration increases)
    • Districts measured by intensity (more schools = higher intensity)
    • high intensity districts likely started out doing worse (more students less schools/teachers)
    • 2 sources of variation:
    • Difference between districts where many schools were built compared to fewer
    • difference across ages
    • natural "difference in difference"
    • it is assumed difference between H and L districts remain constant in absence of program
    • Results;
    • Younger cohorts catching up to older cohorts - gap between age getting smaller
    • education levels are increasing over time faster in H districts than L districts (Difference between H and L smaller)
    • Biggest effect in poorest region
    • sizable return to education in developing country
  6. Worms: Identifying impacts on Education and Helth in the presence of treatment externalities

    • Authors: Edward Miguel, Michael Kremer
    • parasitic worms infect 1/4 of worlds pop.
    • can be effectively treated in 1 dose (constant reinfection from defecating outside, regular treatment probably necessary) (treatment means you cant infect others benefits pop.)
    • goods with positive externalities underprovided (people only pay for private benefit, small fraction of social benefit
    • Externalities makes effect of program look smaller
    • makes estimating impact hard; paper uses tricks to estimate externalities
    • gave deworming pill and prevention education to highly infected regions
    • collected test scores and attendance to treatment and worm load
    • many in treatment group did not recieve treatment (absent due to worm symptoms and dropping out)
    • Impact of program: reduced worm load, not behavior
    • attrition with the students who did not show up
    • percent of students treated did not change much from year to year
    • parent waiver caused problems in second year
    • spillover occured: if you did not get treatment you were less likely to have worms than those who did
    • conclusions
    • big impact on attendence, big spillover
    • Returns to education because more health, in addition to just heal benefits
    • no short run gains in test scores, long run finds positive labor market effects and cognitive gains
  7. Peer Effects, teacher Incentives and the impact of tracking: Evidence from a randomized evaluation in Kenya

    • Authors: Esther Duflo, Pascaline Dupas and Michael Kremer
    • Tracking - putting high performing students together and low preforming students together (AP, Honors Accelerated...)
    • tracking bad? - Worse teachers w worse students?
    • beneficial to learn from high performers
    • Tracking good? - Teachers more specific in teaching (pace), teachers have small incentives because schools only care about best performers due to entrance exams, otherwise no incentive
    • Experimental design: Additional teachers added to 1st grade, half split classes randomly and half used tracking
    • some students had civil service teacher (hard to fire, no incentive) or a contract teacher (year to year contract, incentive)
    • Groups:
    • Tracking ; Contract vs Civil Service
    • non-tracking ; Contract vs Civil Service
    • control
    • Effects of tracking vs no tracking : compare group 1 and 2
    • do incentives matter for teachers? (contract better then civil service?)Does tracking effect teacher effort?
    • Results: effects found that kids develop better in reading/math in tracked classrooms, giving them a head start when returned to pooled classrooms
    • Huge effects of trackig in high and low classrooms
    • results persit when tracking ends, kids with randomly better peers do better
    • kids just below cutoof dont do any worse
    • civil service teachers show up and work more in tacked classroom (no effect for contract teachers)

Informationen

Beschreibung
Business/Economics Folienset am Econ Develop. Countries Exam 1, erstellt von Samuel Jean am 22/03/2022.
Erstellt von
Samuel Jean
Aufrufe
0
Bewertung

Feedback

Worum geht es?

Wie gefällt dir das neue Design?

Dein Eindruck