8090646
Pregunta 1
Pregunta
Damages are the only common law remedy for breach of contract
Respuesta
-
True
-
False
Pregunta 2
Pregunta
Robinson v Harman - 'the purpose of damages is to put the innocent party back in their original position'
Respuesta
-
True
-
False
Pregunta 3
Pregunta
What case is the leading authority for determining consequential loss?
Respuesta
-
Robinson v Harman
-
Hadley v Baxendale
-
The Heron II
Pregunta 4
Pregunta
In Victoria Laundry v Newman Industries, could the innocent party sue for the loss of the potential new contract?
Respuesta
-
Yes, exceptional loss if always recoverable
-
No, exceptional loss is not recoverable
Pregunta 5
Pregunta
Was the loss of profit in The Heron II considered a reasonably possible result of the breach?
Respuesta
-
Yes
-
No
Pregunta 6
Pregunta
Was the loss in Jackson v RBS too remote from the breach of the defendant?
Respuesta
-
Yes
-
No
Pregunta 7
Pregunta
Could the innocent party claim for the loss of the following fixture in The Achilleas?
Respuesta
-
Yes
-
No
Pregunta 8
Pregunta
Was the 'cost of cure' considered unreasonable by the court in Ruxley Electronics v Forsyth?
Respuesta
-
Yes
-
No
Pregunta 9
Pregunta
What is the general rule regarding damages for emotional distress?
Respuesta
-
They are recoverable
-
They are not recoverable
Pregunta 10
Pregunta
However, where MAY a party be awarded damages for emotional distress?
Respuesta
-
Where the terms of the contract specify you can sue for this reason
-
Where the central purpose of the contract is enjoyment or relaxation
-
Where children are involved
¿Quieres crear tus propios Tests gratis con GoConqr? Más información.