431045
Minority Protection
- Sell shares
- Raise an action
- Foss v Harbottle
- Majority can do what it likes
- Exceptions
- Cook v Deeks
- fraud
- company to give up lucrative contract
- fraud
- Cook v Deeks
- Exceptions
- Majority can do what it likes
- s994
- Noble and Sons
- need to attend boad meeting to protest
- need to attend boad meeting to protest
- O'Donnell v Shanahan
- diverting company business to themselves
- diverting company business to themselves
- Saul Harrison & Sons
- Widow took non-voting shares
- Widow took non-voting shares
- s996
- Court can apply what remedey it sees fit
- RH Harmer
- 'President for Life' case
- 'President for Life' case
- RH Harmer
- Court can apply what remedey it sees fit
- O'Neil v Phillips
- Promised shares but no contract
- Promised shares but no contract
- Unfair predjudice
- Noble and Sons
- Derivative Claim
- On behalf of the company
- best interests
- best interests
- s265
- Huges v Weiss
- missapplying company money
- missapplying company money
- On behalf of the company
- Foss v Harbottle
- BIS Investigations
- 'Just and Equitable' winding up
- Principle objective unachievable
- German Date Coffee
- outdated
- outdated
- German Date Coffee
- Deadlock in management
- Yenidje Tobacco
- Could not be in the same room
- Could not be in the same room
- Yenidje Tobacco
- agreement dishonoured (lawfully)
- Ebrahimi v Westbourne Galleries
- quasi-partnership
- quasi-partnership
- Ebrahimi v Westbourne Galleries
- Illegal purpose
- Thomas Brinsmead
- Thomas Brinsmead
- Failure to disclose accounts
- Loch v Blackwood
- Loch v Blackwood
- IA s122(g)
- Principle objective unachievable
- Judicial factor appointed
- Weir v Rees
- Weir v Rees
¿Quieres crear tus propios Mapas Mentales gratis con GoConqr? Más información.