Test
test 1
Crea una cuenta gratis para terminar este test
Guarda tu progreso y consulta tu resultado final.
¿Ya tienes cuenta? Inicia sesión
Preguntas del test (25)
1The sum of the factors of a number is 124. What is the number?
- ANumber lies between 40 and 50
- BNumber lies between 50 and 60
- CNumber lies between 60 and 80
- DMore than one such number exists
2The product of 4 consecutive even numbers is always divisible by
- A600
- B768
- C864
- D384
3Sum of first 25 terms in AP is 525, sum of the next 25 terms is 725, what is the common difference?
- A8/25
- B4/25
- C6/25
- D1/5
4The pie-chart shows the percentage distribution of the expenditure incurred in publishing a book. Study the pie-chart and the answer the questions based on it.
1. If for a certain quantity of books, the publisher has to pay Rs. 30,600 as printing cost, then what will be amount of royalty to be paid for these books?
- A19,450
- B21,200
- C22,950
- D26,150
5Q4 continues
2. What is the central angle of the sector corresponding to the expenditure incurred on Royalty?
- A15º
- B24º
- C54º
- D48º
6Q4 continues
The price of the book is marked 20% above the C.P. If the marked price of the book is Rs. 180, then what is the cost of the paper used in a single copy of the book?
- A36
- B37.5
- C45
- D45.62
7Q4 continues
If 5500 copies are published and the transportation cost on them amounts to Rs. 82500, then what should be the selling price of the book so that the publisher can earn a profit of 25%?
- A187.50
- B191.50
- C175
- D180
8Q4 continues
Royalty on the book is less than the printing cost by:
- A5%
- B33(1/5)%
- C20%
- D25%
9LOGICAL REASONING :
Mr Bankatlal acted as a judge for the beauty contest. There were four participants, viz. Ms Andhra Pradesh, Ms Uttar Pradesh, Ms West Bengal and Ms Maharashtra. Mrs Bankatlal, who was very anxious about the result, asked him about it as soon as he was back home. Mr Bankatlal just told that the one who was wearing the yellow saree won the contest. When Mrs Bankatlal pressed for further details, he elaborated as follows:
1. All of them were sitting in a row.
2. All of them wore sarees of different colours, viz. green, yellow, white, red.
3. There was only one runner-up and she was sitting beside Ms. Maharashtra.
4 .The runner-up was wearing the green saree.
5. Ms West Bengal was not sitting at the ends and was not the runner up.
6 .The winner and the runner-up are not sitting adjacent to each other.
7 .Ms Maharashtra was wearing white saree.
8 .Ms Andhra Pradesh was not wearing the green saree.
9 .Participants wearing yellow saree and white saree were at the ends.
Question 1: Who wore the red saree?- AMs Andhra Pradesh
- BMs West Bengal
- CMs Uttar Pradesh
- D Ms Maharashtra
10Q9 continues
Mr Bankatlal acted as a judge for the beauty contest. There were four participants, viz. Ms Andhra Pradesh, Ms Uttar Pradesh, Ms West Bengal and Ms Maharashtra. Mrs Bankatlal, who was very anxious about the result, asked him about it as soon as he was back home. Mr Bankatlal just told that the one who was wearing the yellow saree won the contest. When Mrs Bankatlal pressed for further details, he elaborated as follows:
1. All of them were sitting in a row.
2. All of them wore sarees of different colours, viz. green, yellow, white, red.
3. There was only one runner-up and she was sitting beside Ms. Maharashtra.
4 .The runner-up was wearing the green saree.
5. Ms West Bengal was not sitting at the ends and was not the runner up.
6 .The winner and the runner-up are not sitting adjacent to each other.
7 .Ms Maharashtra was wearing white saree.
8 .Ms Andhra Pradesh was not wearing the green saree.
9 .Participants wearing yellow saree and white saree were at the ends.
Question 2: Ms. West Bengal was sitting adjacent to- AMs Andhra Pradesh and Ms Maharashtra
- BMs Uttar Pradesh and Ms Maharashtra
- CMs Andhra Pradesh and Ms Uttar Pradesh
- DMs Uttar Pradesh
11Q9 continues
Mr Bankatlal acted as a judge for the beauty contest. There were four participants, viz. Ms Andhra Pradesh, Ms Uttar Pradesh, Ms West Bengal and Ms Maharashtra. Mrs Bankatlal, who was very anxious about the result, asked him about it as soon as he was back home. Mr Bankatlal just told that the one who was wearing the yellow saree won the contest. When Mrs Bankatlal pressed for further details, he elaborated as follows:
1. All of them were sitting in a row.
2. All of them wore sarees of different colours, viz. green, yellow, white, red.
3. There was only one runner-up and she was sitting beside Ms. Maharashtra.
4 .The runner-up was wearing the green saree.
5. Ms West Bengal was not sitting at the ends and was not the runner up.
6 .The winner and the runner-up are not sitting adjacent to each other.
7 .Ms Maharashtra was wearing white saree.
8 .Ms Andhra Pradesh was not wearing the green saree.
9 .Participants wearing yellow saree and white saree were at the ends.
Question 3: Which saree was worn by Ms Andhra Pradesh?- Ayellow
- Bred
- Cgreen
- Dwhite
12Q9 continues
Mr Bankatlal acted as a judge for the beauty contest. There were four participants, viz. Ms Andhra Pradesh, Ms Uttar Pradesh, Ms West Bengal and Ms Maharashtra. Mrs Bankatlal, who was very anxious about the result, asked him about it as soon as he was back home. Mr Bankatlal just told that the one who was wearing the yellow saree won the contest. When Mrs Bankatlal pressed for further details, he elaborated as follows:
1. All of them were sitting in a row.
2. All of them wore sarees of different colours, viz. green, yellow, white, red.
3. There was only one runner-up and she was sitting beside Ms. Maharashtra.
4 .The runner-up was wearing the green saree.
5. Ms West Bengal was not sitting at the ends and was not the runner up.
6 .The winner and the runner-up are not sitting adjacent to each other.
7 .Ms Maharashtra was wearing white saree.
8 .Ms Andhra Pradesh was not wearing the green saree.
9 .Participants wearing yellow saree and white saree were at the ends.
Question 4: Who was the runner-up?- A Ms Andhra Pradesh
- BMs West Bengal
- CMs Uttar Pradesh
- D Ms Maharashtra
13Data Interpretation
Answer the questions based on the following information. Mulayam Software Co., before selling a package to its clients (refer thegiven scheule)
Question 1: Due to overrun in ‘design’, the design stage took 3 months, i.e. months 3, 4 and 5. The number of people working on design in the fifth month was 5. Calculate the percentage change in the cost incurred in the fifth month. (Due to improvement in ‘coding’ technique, this stage was completed in months 6-8 only.)
- A225%
- B150%
- C275%
- D240%
14Question 2: With reference to the above question, what is the cost incurred in the new ‘coding’ stage? (Under the new technique, 4 people work in the sixth month and 5 in the eighth.)
- ARs. 1,40,000
- B Rs. 1,50,000
- CRs. 1,60,000
- DRs. 1,70,000
15Question 3: What is the difference in cost between the old and the new techniques?
- ARs. 30,000
- BRs. 60,000
- C Rs. 70,000
- DRs. 40,000
- ARs. 30,000
16Question 4: Under the new technique, which stage of software development is most expensive for Mulayam Software Co.?
- ATesting
- B Specification
- C Coding
- DDesign
- ATesting
17Question 5: Which five consecutive months have the lowest average cost per man-month under the new technique?
- A1-5
- B 9-13
- C11-15
- DNone of these
- A1-5
18how many numbers of zeros in following expression?
2^11 x 125^3 x 7^11+ 3 ^12 x 7^11×2^10×5^1 + 11^12 x 2^13 x 5^5^5- A3
- B5
- C1
- D10
19PROGRESSION
Sum of first 12 terms of a GP is equal to the sum of the first 14 terms in the same GP. Sum of the first 17 terms is 92, what is the third term in the GP?- A92
- B-92
- C46
- D231
20Read this passage and answer the questions that follow.
There are two theories that have often been used to explain ancient and modern tragedy. Neither
quite explains the complexity of the tragic process or the tragic hero, but each explains important
elements of tragedy, and, because their conclusions are contradictory, they represent extreme
views.
and of the limitation of human effort. But this theory of tragedy is an oversimplification, primarily
because it confuses the tragic condition with the tragic process: the theory does not acknowledge
that fate, in a tragedy, normally becomes external to the hero only after the tragic process has as a
heroism that creates the splendor and exhilaration that is unique to tragedy. The tragic hero quality
of an honest person, but the external antagonist of the criminal. Secondarily, this theory of tragedy
does not distinguish tragedy from irony. Irony does not need an exceptional central figure: the
original destiny never quite fades out of the tragedy.
as a rule, the more ignoble the hero the sharper the irony, when irony alone is the objective. It is
heroism that creates the splendor and exhilaration that is unique to tragedy. The tragic hero
normally has an extraordinary, often a nearly divine, destiny almost within grasp, and the glory of
the original destiny never quite fades out of the tragedy.
The second theory of tragedy states that the act that sets the tragic process in motion must be
primarily a violation of normal law, whether human or divine; in short, that the tragic hero must have
a flaw that has an essential connection with sin. Again it is true that the great majority of tragic
heroes do possess hubris, or a proud and passionate mind that seems to make the hero’s downfall
morally explicable. But such hubris is only the precipitating agent of catastrophe, just as in comedy
the cause )f the happy ending is usually some act of humility often performed by a noble character
who is meanly disguised.
This theory of tragedy as morally explicable runs into the question of whether an innocent sufferer
in a tragedy, such as Iphigenia, or Socrates in Plato Apology, is a tragic figure. They are, of course,
even though it is not very easy to find crucial moral flaws in them. Cordelia shows sincerity and high
spirit in refusing to flatter her faber, and Cordelia is 30 hanged. Tragedy, in short, is ambiguous
and cannot be reduced to the opposition between human effort. and external fate, just as it cannot
be reduced to the opposition between good and evil.
question 1 : The primary purpose of the passage is. to- Acompare and criticize two theories of tragedy.
- Bdevelop a new theory of tragedy.
- Csummarize the thematic content of tragedy.
- D reject one theory of tragedy and offer another theory in its place.
- Edistinguish between tragedy and iron
- Acompare and criticize two theories of tragedy.
21Q20 continues
There are two theories that have often been used to explain ancient and modern tragedy. Neither
quite explains the complexity of the tragic process or the tragic hero, but each explains important
elements of tragedy, and, because their conclusions are contradictory, they represent extreme
views.
and of the limitation of human effort. But this theory of tragedy is an oversimplification, primarily
because it confuses the tragic condition with the tragic process: the theory does not acknowledge
that fate, in a tragedy, normally becomes external to the hero only after the tragic process has as a
heroism that creates the splendor and exhilaration that is unique to tragedy. The tragic hero quality
of an honest person, but the external antagonist of the criminal. Secondarily, this theory of tragedy
does not distinguish tragedy from irony. Irony does not need an exceptional central figure: the
original destiny never quite fades out of the tragedy.
as a rule, the more ignoble the hero the sharper the irony, when irony alone is the objective. It is
heroism that creates the splendor and exhilaration that is unique to tragedy. The tragic hero
normally has an extraordinary, often a nearly divine, destiny almost within grasp, and the glory of
the original destiny never quite fades out of the tragedy.
The second theory of tragedy states that the act that sets the tragic process in motion must be
primarily a violation of normal law, whether human or divine; in short, that the tragic hero must have
a flaw that has an essential connection with sin. Again it is true that the great majority of tragic
heroes do possess hubris, or a proud and passionate mind that seems to make the hero’s downfall
morally explicable. But such hubris is only the precipitating agent of catastrophe, just as in comedy
the cause )f the happy ending is usually some act of humility often performed by a noble character
who is meanly disguised.
This theory of tragedy as morally explicable runs into the question of whether an innocent sufferer
in a tragedy, such as Iphigenia, or Socrates in Plato Apology, is a tragic figure. They are, of course,
even though it is not very easy to find crucial moral flaws in them. Cordelia shows sincerity and high
spirit in refusing to flatter her faber, and Cordelia is 30 hanged. Tragedy, in short, is ambiguous
and cannot be reduced to the opposition between human effort. and external fate, just as it cannot
be reduced to the opposition between good and evil.
question 2 :The author states that the theories discussed in the passage “represent extreme views”
because their conclusions are- Aunpopular
- Bcomplex
- Cparadoxical
- Dcontradictory
- Eimaginative
22There are two theories that have often been used to explain ancient and modern tragedy. Neither
quite explains the complexity of the tragic process or the tragic hero, but each explains important
elements of tragedy, and, because their conclusions are contradictory, they represent extreme
views.
and of the limitation of human effort. But this theory of tragedy is an oversimplification, primarily
because it confuses the tragic condition with the tragic process: the theory does not acknowledge
that fate, in a tragedy, normally becomes external to the hero only after the tragic process has as a
heroism that creates the splendor and exhilaration that is unique to tragedy. The tragic hero quality
of an honest person, but the external antagonist of the criminal. Secondarily, this theory of tragedy
does not distinguish tragedy from irony. Irony does not need an exceptional central figure: the
original destiny never quite fades out of the tragedy.
as a rule, the more ignoble the hero the sharper the irony, when irony alone is the objective. It is
heroism that creates the splendor and exhilaration that is unique to tragedy. The tragic hero
normally has an extraordinary, often a nearly divine, destiny almost within grasp, and the glory of
the original destiny never quite fades out of the tragedy.
The second theory of tragedy states that the act that sets the tragic process in motion must be
primarily a violation of normal law, whether human or divine; in short, that the tragic hero must have
a flaw that has an essential connection with sin. Again it is true that the great majority of tragic
heroes do possess hubris, or a proud and passionate mind that seems to make the hero’s downfall
morally explicable. But such hubris is only the precipitating agent of catastrophe, just as in comedy
the cause )f the happy ending is usually some act of humility often performed by a noble character
who is meanly disguised.
This theory of tragedy as morally explicable runs into the question of whether an innocent sufferer
in a tragedy, such as Iphigenia, or Socrates in Plato Apology, is a tragic figure. They are, of course,
even though it is not very easy to find crucial moral flaws in them. Cordelia shows sincerity and high
spirit in refusing to flatter her faber, and Cordelia is 30 hanged. Tragedy, in short, is ambiguous
and cannot be reduced to the opposition between human effort. and external fate, just as it cannot
be reduced to the opposition between good and evil.
question 3 : Which of the following comparisons of the tragic with the ironic hero is best supported by
information contained in the’ passage?- AA tragic hero’s fate is an external condition, but an ironic hero’s fate is an internal one.
- BA tragic hero must be controlled by fate, but an ironic hero cannot be.
- CA tragic hero’s moral flaw surprises the, audience, but an ironic hero’s sin does not.
- DA tragic hero and an ironic hero cannot both be virtuous figures in the same tragedy.
- EA tragic hero is usually extraordinary, but an ironic hero may be cowardly or even villainous.
23Q20 continues
There are two theories that have often been used to explain ancient and modern tragedy. Neither
quite explains the complexity of the tragic process or the tragic hero, but each explains important
elements of tragedy, and, because their conclusions are contradictory, they represent extreme
views.
and of the limitation of human effort. But this theory of tragedy is an oversimplification, primarily
because it confuses the tragic condition with the tragic process: the theory does not acknowledge
that fate, in a tragedy, normally becomes external to the hero only after the tragic process has as a
heroism that creates the splendor and exhilaration that is unique to tragedy. The tragic hero quality
of an honest person, but the external antagonist of the criminal. Secondarily, this theory of tragedy
does not distinguish tragedy from irony. Irony does not need an exceptional central figure: the
original destiny never quite fades out of the tragedy.
as a rule, the more ignoble the hero the sharper the irony, when irony alone is the objective. It is
heroism that creates the splendor and exhilaration that is unique to tragedy. The tragic hero
normally has an extraordinary, often a nearly divine, destiny almost within grasp, and the glory of
the original destiny never quite fades out of the tragedy.
The second theory of tragedy states that the act that sets the tragic process in motion must be
primarily a violation of normal law, whether human or divine; in short, that the tragic hero must have
a flaw that has an essential connection with sin. Again it is true that the great majority of tragic
heroes do possess hubris, or a proud and passionate mind that seems to make the hero’s downfall
morally explicable. But such hubris is only the precipitating agent of catastrophe, just as in comedy
the cause )f the happy ending is usually some act of humility often performed by a noble character
who is meanly disguised.
This theory of tragedy as morally explicable runs into the question of whether an innocent sufferer
in a tragedy, such as Iphigenia, or Socrates in Plato Apology, is a tragic figure. They are, of course,
even though it is not very easy to find crucial moral flaws in them. Cordelia shows sincerity and high
spirit in refusing to flatter her faber, and Cordelia is 30 hanged. Tragedy, in short, is ambiguous
and cannot be reduced to the opposition between human effort. and external fate, just as it cannot
be reduced to the opposition between good and evil.
question 4. The author contrasts an honest person and a criminal primarily in order to- A prove that fate cannot be external to the tragic hero.
- Bestablish a criterion that allows a distinction to be made between irony and tragedy.
- C develop the distinction between the tragic condition and the tragic process.
- D introduce the concept of sin as the cause of tragic action.
- Eargue that the theme of omnipotent external fate is shared by comedy and tragedy.
- A prove that fate cannot be external to the tragic hero.
24Q20 continues
There are two theories that have often been used to explain ancient and modern tragedy. Neither
quite explains the complexity of the tragic process or the tragic hero, but each explains important
elements of tragedy, and, because their conclusions are contradictory, they represent extreme
views.
and of the limitation of human effort. But this theory of tragedy is an oversimplification, primarily
because it confuses the tragic condition with the tragic process: the theory does not acknowledge
that fate, in a tragedy, normally becomes external to the hero only after the tragic process has as a
heroism that creates the splendor and exhilaration that is unique to tragedy. The tragic hero quality
of an honest person, but the external antagonist of the criminal. Secondarily, this theory of tragedy
does not distinguish tragedy from irony. Irony does not need an exceptional central figure: the
original destiny never quite fades out of the tragedy.
as a rule, the more ignoble the hero the sharper the irony, when irony alone is the objective. It is
heroism that creates the splendor and exhilaration that is unique to tragedy. The tragic hero
normally has an extraordinary, often a nearly divine, destiny almost within grasp, and the glory of
the original destiny never quite fades out of the tragedy.
The second theory of tragedy states that the act that sets the tragic process in motion must be
primarily a violation of normal law, whether human or divine; in short, that the tragic hero must have
a flaw that has an essential connection with sin. Again it is true that the great majority of tragic
heroes do possess hubris, or a proud and passionate mind that seems to make the hero’s downfall
morally explicable. But such hubris is only the precipitating agent of catastrophe, just as in comedy
the cause )f the happy ending is usually some act of humility often performed by a noble character
who is meanly disguised.
This theory of tragedy as morally explicable runs into the question of whether an innocent sufferer
in a tragedy, such as Iphigenia, or Socrates in Plato Apology, is a tragic figure. They are, of course,
even though it is not very easy to find crucial moral flaws in them. Cordelia shows sincerity and high
spirit in refusing to flatter her faber, and Cordelia is 30 hanged. Tragedy, in short, is ambiguous
and cannot be reduced to the opposition between human effort. and external fate, just as it cannot
be reduced to the opposition between good and evil.
question 5. According to the. author, Cordellia is an example of a figure who- Atranscended both the laws of ‘fate and the laws of society.
- B sinned, but whose sin did not set the tragic process in motion.
- C disobeyed a moral law, but was not punished for doing so.
- D submitted willingly to fate, even though her submission caused her death.
- Edid not set the tragic process in motion, but is still a tragic figure.
- Atranscended both the laws of ‘fate and the laws of society.
25Q20 continues
There are two theories that have often been used to explain ancient and modern tragedy. Neither
quite explains the complexity of the tragic process or the tragic hero, but each explains important
elements of tragedy, and, because their conclusions are contradictory, they represent extreme
views.
and of the limitation of human effort. But this theory of tragedy is an oversimplification, primarily
because it confuses the tragic condition with the tragic process: the theory does not acknowledge
that fate, in a tragedy, normally becomes external to the hero only after the tragic process has as a
heroism that creates the splendor and exhilaration that is unique to tragedy. The tragic hero quality
of an honest person, but the external antagonist of the criminal. Secondarily, this theory of tragedy
does not distinguish tragedy from irony. Irony does not need an exceptional central figure: the
original destiny never quite fades out of the tragedy.
as a rule, the more ignoble the hero the sharper the irony, when irony alone is the objective. It is
heroism that creates the splendor and exhilaration that is unique to tragedy. The tragic hero
normally has an extraordinary, often a nearly divine, destiny almost within grasp, and the glory of
the original destiny never quite fades out of the tragedy.
The second theory of tragedy states that the act that sets the tragic process in motion must be
primarily a violation of normal law, whether human or divine; in short, that the tragic hero must have
a flaw that has an essential connection with sin. Again it is true that the great majority of tragic
heroes do possess hubris, or a proud and passionate mind that seems to make the hero’s downfall
morally explicable. But such hubris is only the precipitating agent of catastrophe, just as in comedy
the cause )f the happy ending is usually some act of humility often performed by a noble character
who is meanly disguised.
This theory of tragedy as morally explicable runs into the question of whether an innocent sufferer
in a tragedy, such as Iphigenia, or Socrates in Plato Apology, is a tragic figure. They are, of course,
even though it is not very easy to find crucial moral flaws in them. Cordelia shows sincerity and high
spirit in refusing to flatter her faber, and Cordelia is 30 hanged. Tragedy, in short, is ambiguous
and cannot be reduced to the opposition between human effort. and external fate, just as it cannot
be reduced to the opposition between good and evil.
question 6. In the author’s opinion, an act of humility in comedy is most analogous to- Aa catastrophe in tragedy.
- Ban ironic action in tragedy.
- C a tragic hero’s pride and passion
- D a tragic hero’s aversion to sin.
- E a tragic hero’s pursuit of an unusual destiny.
- Aa catastrophe in tragedy.
Información
- Descripción
- gregergergerg
- Autor
- vidyadhar
- Idioma
- English
- Visitas
- 64
- Etiquetas
- Valoración
- Aún sin valoraciones Valora este test