Test
Sin título
Este test tiene tipos de pregunta que se abren en el reproductor de siempre.
Preguntas del test (16)
1What is the rescorla wagner model?
1. learning is [blank_start]change[blank_end] in [blank_start]associative[blank_end] [blank_start]strength[blank_end] across [blank_start]trials[blank_end] between CS & US, limited by [blank_start]US[blank_end] ([blank_start]Vmax[blank_end])
2. [blank_start]direction[blank_end] of relationship is function of difference between [blank_start]predicted[blank_end] US ([blank_start]V[blank_end]) and [blank_start]actual[blank_end] US ([blank_start]Vmax[blank_end])- Achange
- Bassociative
- Cstrength
- Dtrials
- EUS
- FVmax
- Gdirection
- Hpredicted
- IV
- Jactual
- KVmax
2How does the RW model explain the acquision curve?
1. rate depends on characteristics of [blank_start]CS[blank_end]/[blank_start]US[blank_end]
2. initially [blank_start]large[blank_end] [blank_start]change[blank_end] in [blank_start]associative[blank_end] [blank_start]strength[blank_end], [blank_start]smaller[blank_end] with each [blank_start]trial[blank_end], until [blank_start]max[blank_end] [blank_start]amount[blank_end] of [blank_start]learning[blank_end] ([blank_start]asymptote[blank_end]) of that [blank_start]US[blank_end] is reached- ACS
- BUS
- Clarge
- Dchange
- Eassociative
- Fstrength
- Gsmaller
- Htrial
- Imax
- Jamount
- Klearning
- Lasymptote
- MUS
3How does the RW model explain blocking?
1. [blank_start]predicted[blank_end] US (V) = accounts for [blank_start]combined[blank_end] [blank_start]associative[blank_end] [blank_start]strength[blank_end] of [blank_start]all[blank_end] [blank_start]CS[blank_end] present
2. if [blank_start]previous[blank_end] CS fully [blank_start]predicts[blank_end] US, then no [blank_start]difference[blank_end] between [blank_start]predicted[blank_end] US and [blank_start]actual[blank_end] US, so no change in [blank_start]associative[blank_end] [blank_start]strength[blank_end] and no change in [blank_start]learning[blank_end] for other CS- Apredicted
- Bcombined
- Cassociative
- Dstrength
- ECS
- Fall
- Gprevious
- Hpredicts
- Idifference
- Jpredicted
- Kactual
- Lassociative
- Mstrength
- Nlearning
4How does the RW model explain context conditioning?
1. effect of [blank_start]contingency[blank_end] = [blank_start]US[blank_end] without [blank_start]CS[blank_end] interferes with [blank_start]conditioning[blank_end]
2. intially conditioning for both [blank_start]CS[blank_end] and [blank_start]environment[blank_end] = together exceed [blank_start]Vmax[blank_end] = decreased [blank_start]associative[blank_end] [blank_start]strength[blank_end]
3. when [blank_start]US[blank_end] next presented without [blank_start]CS[blank_end], [blank_start]environmental[blank_end] [blank_start]cues[blank_end] still present = below [blank_start]Vmax[blank_end], increased [blank_start]associative[blank_end] [blank_start]strength[blank_end]- Acontingency
- BUS
- CCS
- Dconditioning
- ECS
- Fenvironment
- GVmax
- Hassociative
- Istrength
- JUS
- KCS
- Lenvironmental
- Mcues
- NVmax
- Oassociative
- Pstrength
5How does the RW model explain decreased association?
1. predicts loss of associative strength even when [blank_start]CS[blank_end] is [blank_start]paired[blank_end] with [blank_start]US[blank_end]
2. initially condition each [blank_start]CS[blank_end] [blank_start]separately[blank_end] with [blank_start]US[blank_end] until [blank_start]Vmax[blank_end] is reached
3. when combined into [blank_start]compound[blank_end] [blank_start]stimulus[blank_end] = exceed [blank_start]Vmax[blank_end] = each takes [blank_start]half[blank_end] of [blank_start]associative[blank_end] [blank_start]strength[blank_end] = both now have decreased [blank_start]associative[blank_end] [blank_start]strength[blank_end]- ACS
- Bpaired
- CUS
- DCS
- Eseparately
- FUS
- GVmax
- Hcompound
- Istimulus
- JVmax
- Khalf
- Lassociative
- Mstrength
- Nassociative
- Ostrength
6How is latent inhibition a limitation of the RW model?
1. effect of [blank_start]CS[blank_end] [blank_start]pre-exposure[blank_end] = model predicts no [blank_start]conditioning[blank_end] because no [blank_start]US[blank_end] present ([blank_start]Vmax[blank_end] = [blank_start]0[blank_end])
2. however, actually found [blank_start]effect[blank_end] = conditioning [blank_start]slower[blank_end] in [blank_start]pre-exposed[blank_end] group- ACS
- Bpre-exposure
- Cconditioning
- DUS
- EVmax
- F0
- Geffect
- Hslower
- Ipre-exposed
7How is configural learning a limitation to the RW model?
1. model predicts [blank_start]associative[blank_end] [blank_start]strength[blank_end] of [blank_start]compound[blank_end] stimulus to be [blank_start]sum[blank_end] of all [blank_start]CS[blank_end] = predicts [blank_start]greater[blank_end] response to [blank_start]compound[blank_end] stimulus than [blank_start]separate[blank_end] components
2. however = [blank_start]response[blank_end] higher when presented [blank_start]alone[blank_end], treated [blank_start]compound[blank_end] as [blank_start]novel[blank_end] stimulus- Aassociative
- Bstrength
- Ccompound
- Dsum
- ECS
- Fgreater
- Gcompound
- Hseparate
- Iresponse
- Jalone
- Kcompound
- Lnovel
8How is occasion setting a limitation to the RW model?
1. [blank_start]light[blank_end] led to [blank_start]food[blank_end] only if [blank_start]tone[blank_end] present = next presented [blank_start]tone[blank_end] without [blank_start]food[blank_end], but [blank_start]tone[blank_end] not [blank_start]extinguished[blank_end] = still responded more to [blank_start]pair[blank_end] than just [blank_start]light[blank_end]
2. [blank_start]tone[blank_end] not directly associated with [blank_start]US[blank_end], but [blank_start]facilitator[blank_end] for CS/US [blank_start]association[blank_end]- Alight
- Bfood
- Ctone
- Dtone
- Efood
- Ftone
- Gextinguished
- Hpair
- Ilight
- Jtone
- KUS
- Lfacilitator
- Massociation
9What is the theory of attention?
1. during conditioning trials with [blank_start]multiple[blank_end] [blank_start]stimuli[blank_end] present, [blank_start]attend[blank_end] to only one or few and only [blank_start]learn[blank_end] about [blank_start]selected[blank_end] [blank_start]stimuli[blank_end]
2. learning is [blank_start]active[blank_end] = [blank_start]seek[blank_end] info to [blank_start]predict[blank_end] [blank_start]biologically[blank_end] significant event ([blank_start]US[blank_end]), [blank_start]ignore[blank_end] other stimuli, recognize [blank_start]correlation[blank_end] between CS/US- Amultiple
- Bstimuli
- Cattend
- Dlearn
- Eselected
- Fstimuli
- Gactive
- Hseek
- Ipredict
- Jbiologically
- KUS
- Lignore
- Mcorrelation
10What is learned irrelevance?
1. theory of [blank_start]attention[blank_end]
2. [blank_start]CS[blank_end] [blank_start]pre-exposure[blank_end] = animal learns CS [blank_start]irrelevant[blank_end], stop [blank_start]attending[blank_end], difficulty [blank_start]learning[blank_end] [blank_start]association[blank_end] later
3. evidence = greater [blank_start]interference[blank_end] by [blank_start]uncorrelated[blank_end] [blank_start]presentations[blank_end] of CS/US [blank_start]together[blank_end] than either [blank_start]alone[blank_end]
4. evidence = CS [blank_start]effectiveness[blank_end] decreased when US already [blank_start]predicted[blank_end] ([blank_start]blocking[blank_end]) = increase [blank_start]US[blank_end] [blank_start]intensity[blank_end] to regain [blank_start]effectiveness[blank_end], cause [blank_start]surprise[blank_end]- Aattention
- BCS
- Cpre-exposure
- Dirrelevant
- Eattending
- Flearning
- Gassociation
- Hinterference
- Iuncorrelated
- Jpresentations
- Ktogether
- Lalone
- Meffectiveness
- Npredicted
- Oblocking
- Pintensity
- QUS
- Reffectiveness
- Ssurprise
11What are comparator theories?
1. animal compares [blank_start]probability[blank_end] of US in [blank_start]presence[blank_end] of CS to [blank_start]absense[blank_end] of CS = overall [blank_start]long-term[blank_end] [blank_start]correlation[blank_end], not by [blank_start]trial[blank_end]
2. determines [blank_start]performance[blank_end] = animal still learns US sometimes [blank_start]occurs[blank_end] in [blank_start]presence[blank_end] of CS, but will not [blank_start]elicit[blank_end] [blank_start]response[blank_end] unless greater [blank_start]excitatory[blank_end] [blank_start]strength[blank_end] than [blank_start]environmental[blank_end] [blank_start]stimuli[blank_end]
3. evidence = after [blank_start]conditioning[blank_end], repeatedly present [blank_start]context[blank_end] without [blank_start]US[blank_end] = extinguishes [blank_start]contect[blank_end] and CS becomes better [blank_start]predictor[blank_end] = increased [blank_start]response[blank_end] to CS- Aprobability
- Bpresence
- Cabsense
- Dlong-term
- Ecorrelation
- Ftrial
- Gperformance
- Hoccurs
- Ipresence
- Jelicit
- Kresponse
- Lexcitatory
- Mstrength
- Nenvironmental
- Ostimuli
- Pconditioning
- Qcontext
- RUS
- Scontext
- Tpredictor
- Uresponse
12s-s?
1. association between [blank_start]stimuli[blank_end] ([blank_start]CS[blank_end] & [blank_start]US[blank_end])
2. [blank_start]simultaneous[blank_end] activation of [blank_start]tone[blank_end]/[blank_start]food[blank_end] center forms [blank_start]pathway[blank_end]- Astimuli
- BCS
- CUS
- Dsimultaneous
- Etone
- Ffood
- Gpathway
13S-R?
1. association between [blank_start]stimulus[blank_end] ([blank_start]CS[blank_end]) and [blank_start]response[blank_end]
2. CS [blank_start]directly[blank_end] [blank_start]elicits[blank_end] response- Astimulus
- BCS
- Cresponse
- Delicits
- Edirectly
14Food unpalitable
1. supports [blank_start]s-s[blank_end] theory
2. after [blank_start]conditioned[blank_end] [blank_start]association[blank_end] between [blank_start]tone[blank_end] (CS) and [blank_start]food[blank_end] (US) = increased [blank_start]activity[blank_end] (response)
3. make food [blank_start]unattractive[blank_end] = reduced [blank_start]activity[blank_end] in response to [blank_start]tone[blank_end]- As-s
- Bassociation
- Cconditioned
- Dtone
- Efood
- Factivity
- Gunattractive
- Hactivity
- Itone
152nd order conditioning
1. supports both [blank_start]s-s[blank_end] and [blank_start]s-r[blank_end] theories
2. first pair [blank_start]CS1[blank_end] with [blank_start]US[blank_end], then pair [blank_start]CS2[blank_end] with [blank_start]CS1[blank_end], then extinguish [blank_start]CS1[blank_end]- As-s
- Bs-r
- CCS1
- DUS
- ECS2
- FCS1
- GCS1
16rat food hopper
1. evidence for [blank_start]stimulus[blank_end] [blank_start]expectation[blank_end]
2. two [blank_start]separate[blank_end] [blank_start]CS[blank_end] paired with separate US ([blank_start]food[blank_end]) leading to response ([blank_start]approach[blank_end]), then [blank_start]devalued[blank_end] one US ([blank_start]taste[blank_end] [blank_start]aversion[blank_end])
3. didn't [blank_start]respond[blank_end] to CS leading to [blank_start]aversive[blank_end] US, still [blank_start]responded[blank_end] to other CS = expectation of [blank_start]specific[blank_end] [blank_start]reward[blank_end]- Aexpectation
- Bstimulus
- Cseparate
- DCS
- Efood
- Fapproach
- Gdevalued
- Htaste
- Iaversion
- Jrespond
- Kaversive
- Lresponded
- Mspecific
- Nreward
Información
- Descripción
- Test sobre Sin título, creado por Taylor Falcone el 19/03/2021.
- Autor
- Taylor Falcone
- Idioma
- English
- Visitas
- 0
- Valoración
- Aún sin valoraciones Valora este test