5122753
| Question | Answer |
| Gibson v Manchester City Council | Invitation to treat / Offer |
| Hyde v Wrench With a wrench in the kitchen | Counter offer KILLS off the original offer |
| Butler Machine Tool v Ex-cell-o | Battle of the forms -last shot wins |
| Household Fire Insurance v Grant | Postal rule still applies when letter is never received |
| Entores v Miles Far East | Actual communication applied to instantaneous modes of comms |
| Byrne v Van Tienhoven | Postal rule does NOT apply to revocation. Must be received |
| Carllil v Carbolic Smoke Ball Really? | UNILATERAL CONTRACT Ads are capable of being offers Acceptance can be performance of a requested act (no need to communicate in unilateral) |
| Errington v Errington | Not possible to revoke once the offeree has commenced performance |
| Partridge v Crittenden | Ads are usually ITT, using stock argument |
| Fisher v Bell Pharmaceutical Society v Boots | Items in the shop window Items on the shelves are ITT |
| Spencer v Harding | Bids and tenders are ITT |
Want to create your own Flashcards for free with GoConqr? Learn more.