SOCIAL THEORIES OF AGGRESSION

Description

Flashcards on SOCIAL THEORIES OF AGGRESSION, created by erika.jones.x on 04/23/2014.
erika.jones.x
Flashcards by erika.jones.x, updated more than 1 year ago
erika.jones.x
Created by erika.jones.x about 12 years ago
51
1

Resource summary

Question Answer
Social Approaches to Aggression: Social Learning Theory - Bandura Deindividuation - Gustave Le Bon and Zimbardo
Social Learning Theory: Aggression cannot be explained using only direct experience. We learn through direct experience and observation of people who we relate to (parents).
Observation Children watch the behaviour of their parents and imitate their behaviour
VICARIOUS REINFORCEMENT Children learn about the consequences of aggressive behaviour
MENTAL REPRESENTATION For SLT to take place, a child must form a mental representation in their mind of events in their social environment
MENTAL REPRESENTATION The child will imagine the rewards or punishments they would receive for their aggressive behaviour
MAINTENANCE THROUGH DIRECT EXPERIENCE If children are rewarded for aggressive behaviour they are more likely to repeat the same behaviour, if they are punished they will be less likely to repeat the behaviour again
MAINTENANCE THROUGH DIRECT EXPERIENCE If a child associates aggression with rewards they are more likely to do it again e.g. a successful bully will learn that they get rewards from being aggressive towards other people
BOBO DOLL STUDY BANDURA ET AL (1961) Children learn and reproduce behaviour they have seen from a model
METHOD > Male and Female children aged 3 to 5 years > Half shown a model being aggressive towards a Bobo doll > Half shown model not being aggressive to Bobo doll > Children made frustrated by being shown toys that they are not allowed to play with
RESULTS > Children in the aggression condition were more likely to be aggressive towards Bobo doll > Copied verbal and physical aggression
SUPPORTING STUDY BANDURA AND WALTERS (1963) The aggressive ending to the film and seeing the model being rewarded for their aggression caused an increase in aggression
DEINDIVIDUATION - Gustave Le Bon (1895) A psychological state characterised by lowered -self evaluation and decreased concerns about evaluation by others. This leads to an increase in behaviour that would normally be inhibited by personal and social norms.
ANONYMITY Being anonymous in a crowd has the psychological consequence of reducing inner restraints and increasing behaviours that are usually inhibited
MAIN STUDY - ZIMBARDO (1969) Participants in the deindividuation condition shocked the 'learner' for twice as long as the identifiable pareticipants
METHOD > 4 women required to give electrical shocks to 'learner' > 2 wore bulky lab coats and hoods to hide their identity, they were never refured to by name > 2 wore normal cloths and large name tags
EVALUATION > Small sample, only female - cannot be generalised > Ethics? Lied to participants about nature of the experiment
CONTRADICTORY EVIDENCE FOR DEINDIVIDUATION - POSTMES AND SPEARS (1998) Meta-analysis of 60 studies. Found inconclusive evidence to support major claims e.g. anti-social behaviour not more common in larger groups.
SUPPORT FOR DEINDIVIDUATION - MANN ET AL (1981) Analysed 21 newspaper reports of suicide jumps in the US. 10/21 - A crowd had gathered and baiting had occured. Incidents occured at night with a large crowd.
LOCAL GROUP NORMS - JOHNSON AND DOWNING (1979) > Same set up as Zimbardo > Participants either dressed as KKK or a nurse > Responded to normative cues - participants dressed as KKK shocked more than control, participants dressed as nurse shocked less than control
Show full summary Hide full summary

Similar