THE LEGACY OF JOHN B. WATSON’S BEHAVIORIST MANIFESTO FOR APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS

Description

Mind Map on THE LEGACY OF JOHN B. WATSON’S BEHAVIORIST MANIFESTO FOR APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, created by Dana Yesenia Rojas Cardona on 04/09/2022.
Dana Yesenia Rojas Cardona
Mind Map by Dana Yesenia Rojas Cardona, updated more than 1 year ago
Dana Yesenia Rojas Cardona
Created by Dana Yesenia Rojas Cardona over 3 years ago
13
0

Resource summary

THE LEGACY OF JOHN B. WATSON’S BEHAVIORIST MANIFESTO FOR APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS
  1. Watson’s Legacy: Applied Behavior Analysis
    1. As for applied behavior analysis, Baer et al. (1968) described its seven dimensions in the following order: The field “must be applied, behavioral, and analytic. In addition, it should be technological, conceptually systematic, and effective, and it should display some generality.
      1. “Psychology as the behaviorist views it is a purely objective experimental branch of natural science”
        1. its legacy for the latter’s conceptual systems dimension.
      2. The Conceptual Systems Dimension: Naturalism
        1. listed this dimension fifth among the seven dimensions of applied behavior analysis. By then, behavior analysis was psychology’s leading neobehaviorism and well-enough established as a system that other dimensions were more important for founding applied behavior analysis
          1. did not specify a particular system, it was Skinner’s
            1. They referred only to operant principles (e.g., reinforcement), operant processes (e.g., fading), and operant concepts
            2. Psychology as the Behaviorist Views It
              1. His article did not defend naturalism so much as criticize the psychology of consciousness and advance the psychology of behavior, as follows.
              2. The psychology of consciousness.
                1. In both cases, consciousness was their subject matter, but not, in both cases, what they studied
                  1. In the first psychology of consciousness, human consciousness was psychology’s only subject matter and what it studied through introspection
                    1. Structuralism studied conscious states and their elements, in particular, sensations, feelings, and images. Functionalism studied conscious processes, for instance, sensing, thinking, and remembering
                      1. They were dualistic in assuming that consciousness existed independent of behavior
                        1. In the second psychology of consciousness, consciousness was psychology’s subject matter, but not what it studied. It studied behavior for methodological reasons: Consciousness could not be objectively defined, directly observed, or accurately and reliably measured
                    2. The psychology of behavior
                      1. The psychology of behavior Watson (1913b) advanced also came in two varieties
                        1. In both, behavior was their subject matter and what they studied, but for different reasons
                          1. Watson’s (1913b) methodological behaviorism did not deny the existence of consciousness. As he wrote in his introductory paragraph, “Introspection forms no essen‑ tial part of [psychology’s] methods, nor is the scientific value of its data dependent on the readiness with which they lend themselves to interpretations in terms of consciousness”
                          2. The Behavioral Dimension: Objectivity
                            1. listed the behavioral dimension second among the seven dimensions of applied behavior analysis
                              1. However, he did not use the term behavioral, but instead, the term, objective: “Psychology as the behaviorist views it is a purely objective experimental branch of natural science
                              2. The Behavioral Dimension
                                1. usually studies what subjects can be brought to do rather than what they can be brought to say; unless, of course, a verbal response is of interest. Accordingly a subject’s verbal description of his own non-verbal behavior usually would not be accepted as a measure of his actual behavior unless it were independently substantiated
                                Show full summary Hide full summary

                                Similar