Performance Measurement

Performance Measurement

1. 1984_Dess_Robinson

   • H1: There will be a significante positive correlation between objetctive and subjective measures of return on assets. (r=0.611, p<0.01)
   • H2: There will be a significant positive correlation between objective and subjective measures of sales growth. (r=0.694, p<0.001)
   • H3: There will be a significant positive correlation between subjetive and objective measures of sales growth and return on assets and global measures of organizational performance by organizational members. (r=0.7335, p<0.001)

2. 2004_Hoque

   • H1: Strategy --> use of PMS --> Performance (b = 0.27, p<0.05)
   • H2: Environmental Uncertainty --> use of PMS --> Performance (b = 0.02, n.s)

3. 2007_Hyvonen

   • H1a: A fit between the customer-focused strategy and contemporary performance measures will lead to enhanced customer performance of the firm. (b=0.35, p>0.05)
   • H1b: A fit between the customer-focused strategy and financial performance measures will lead to enhanced customer performance of the firm. (b=2.25, p<0.05)
   • H2: A fit between the customer-focused strategy and advanced information technology will lead to enhanced customer performance of the firm. (b=0.20, p>0.05)
   • H3a: A fit between the customer-focused strategy, contemporary performance measures and advanced information technology will lead to enhanced customer performance of the firm. (b= -2.30, p=0.001).
   • H3b: A fit between the customer-focused strategy, financial performance measures and advanced information technology will lead to enhanced customer performance of the firm. (b=1.74, p>0.05)

4. 2016_Singh et al.

   • P1: Subjective measures of OP are valid and can be employed to measure the stand-alone performance strength of enterprises or to measure an enterprise’s performance vis-`a-vis its rivals. (Supported)
   • P2: Compared with each other, there should exist statistically significant differences in inter-country OP measures. (x2 = 182.542, p<0.05).

5. 2016_Yaghoobi_Haddadi

   • The purpose of this paper is to investigate the overall organizational performance by developing a performance evaluation model, based on integrating two methodologies (BSC - AHP)

6. 2012_Bisbe_Malagueño

   • H1: SPMS --> Comprehensiveness of the Strategic Decision Arrays --> OP (ROA b=0.130, p<0.05; ROS b=0.185, p<0.01)
     • H1a: SPMS --> Comprehensiveness of the Strategic Decision Arrays (
     • H1b: Comprehensiveness of the Strategic Decision Arrays --> OP (ROA: p<0.05; ROS: p<0.01)
   • H4: [Moderation (-) Environmental Dynamism] --> H1 - Supported for low and medium level
     • H2: SPMS --> [Moderation (+) Environmental Dynamism} -->Comprehensiveness of the Strategic Decision Arrays (p>0.10)
     • H3: Comprehensiveness of the Strategic Decision Arrays --> [Moderation (-) Environmental Dynamism]-->OP - Supported