Development and Globalisation

Description

Mind Map on Development and Globalisation, created by Sarah Mather on 16/06/2013.
Sarah Mather
Mind Map by Sarah Mather, updated more than 1 year ago
Sarah Mather
Created by Sarah Mather over 12 years ago
102
0

Resource summary

Development and Globalisation
  1. What is globalisation
    1. A concept that prevails contemporary development and frames most topics. Quite simply, the world is becoming increasingly interconnected. Interconnectedness is demonstrated in the spread of technology, culture and the flow of cultures, nations, people and ideas.
    2. Causes of Globalisation
      1. It is a complex phenomenon driven by many innovations and changes. Economic developments are a central cause, new technologies. increased geographical mobility, new transport for products e.g. air/shipping etc.
        1. Trade liberalisation has become a significant aspect since many barriers to international trade have become diminished. The 20th Century has lead to the growth of transnational corporations such as Nike, Vauxhall and Fyffes etc.
          1. There have been significant political factors such as the necesitate global co-operation to ease environmental damage e.g. acid rain, pollution and global warming. Several IGO's have also evolved into discussion forums such as the UN (UNited Nations) and the EU (European Union).
            1. THIS LINKS TO THE MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS SET UP BY THE UN IN 2000.
            2. Sociocultural factors such as the development of the internet which has transformed interaction and knowledge. Marshall McLuhan (1962) argues that improvements to media technology has created a global village of communication that is made easier. There is also been a development of the mass media which has icnreased satelite communication.
              1. We can quickly know what is happening in the world which was impossible in the past. We also have cheaper transport that has facillitated the increased tourism/immigration.
            3. Effects of Gloabalisation
              1. Economic impacts e.g. transformation of the imports of goods/selling products, relative autonomy and independence in ters of economies, national economies become integrated into the global system and sonsequently turbulence in one region of the world can affect the financial stability elsewhere.
                1. Politically, globalisation has reshaped decision-making since elecation of power from TNO's (corporate or governmental) has increased. Power from governments has equally devolved to individuals who now exercise direct influence on the world e.g. terrorism
                2. Socially, there is more diversity, pluralism accross cultures e.g. encountering food, culture and religious belief in various societies. There is also an increaing sense of homogeneity such as the spread of cultural artefacts. Its also affected personal lives e.g. social media such as Twitter has developed a new network of global communication.
                3. Positives of Globalisation
                  1. Golden Age of a Civil society. Economically, there is increased trade, the possibility to increase the wealth of the poor, growth of TNC's, new markets, employment and wealth. Thomas Friedman (1999) argues that if nations have economic interest in each other, governments can resolve disagreement.
                    1. This also increases political forums which makes the world arguably more stable and safe e.g. the rise of consumer power concentrates power directly in the hands of the indicidual and is thereby seen as more democratic.
                    2. People become more aware of different cultures and a culturally diverse era. People become integrated and aware of connections.
                    3. Negatives of Gloabalisation
                      1. There is much critique of globalisation wsince it has been linkened to Westernisation and the ideas of the rich world. Williamson (1990) calls this the 'WASHINGTON CONSENSUS"
                        1. Economically, there is a wave of neo-liberal dominant globalisation that has imposed free market politics on the third world regardless of its capacity to work with these principles. The West also controls trade reegulation.
                          1. E.g. the World Trade Organisation has enabled to maintain a protectionist policies and therefore meanign that trade merely benefits the rich.
                          2. The Philanthropist George Soros (1998) argues that neoliberal globalisation has created an environment of uncontrolled capitalism and large corporations are free to exploit. Governments are unable to restrain businesses. There is now a culture of impetialism whereby the position of one way of life and one set of norms and values become embeddewd on the rest of the world. Therefore, we are in an era of Westernisation.
                          3. Noam Chomsky (2001) - Politics and Globalisation
                            1. it favours the power of the rich and moves away form democracy e.g. the World Bankm IMF, WTO run on a dollar per vote basis and the developed world make dominate decisions e.g. more influential in the UN. Increased consumer power also disproportionately benefits the rich West.
                              1. "Globalisation is simpyl a mean sof international integration. That is a fine thing. So everyone is in favour of globalisation but the term is used in a special way.. referring to a specific form of integration that has been imposed by a small sector of wealthy, powerful nations" (CHOMSKY)
                            2. Is globalisation new?
                              1. David Held argues that there are 3 main perspectives in globalisation called the new era of history (hyperglobalisers) whereby goods, services, cultures, technologies and ideas have flowed accross the world to maintain a global world system. However, arguably, it is not a new phenomenon e.g. connections are well established they are just becoming more established this is what sceptics argue.
                                1. By contrast, transformationalists argue we are at middle ground, as integration and exchange are without historical precendent. Like sceptics, they reject the idea that the nation state will inevitably decline however the current flux of adaptation has lead to transnational governance and this will restricture government/social institution.s New ineuqalities/power relations will rise.
                                2. Ultimately this is a controverisial debate that has no collective answer.
                                Show full summary Hide full summary

                                Similar

                                Core and Periphery Theory
                                rebekah_scott
                                Aid
                                scott241
                                Newly industrialised countries (NICs)
                                bennicol95