Note that, as Sperry predicted, the
retina expresses a counter gradient of
the receptor (EphA3). Why is this?
Although we have considered this gradient to
be guiding, it is possible to conceive that the
Eph-Ephrin system is only providing positional
information (Sperry’s “Latitude and
Longitude”), not guiding information.
For example, growth cones may grow into
the tectum randomly and continue to grow
until they hit a specific ‘Stop’ signal.
This signal might be a
specific level of Eph
receptor activation….
High density of receptor on
temporal growth cones ensures
enough signal to stop even when
ligand at low density:
However, for more nasal growth
cones, the lower density of receptor on
their surface means that only when the
ligand density is higher will enough
signal be generated:
However
The stripe assay suggests
an all or nothing, not
graded response
And, in vitro assays suggest
ephrins repel axons, not
merely stop them….
A graded transition
from growth
promotion to inhibition
Relative outgrowth
compared to growth on no
(0%) ephrinA2
Clearly indicates that Ephrins are growth
promoting at lower and inhibitory at
higher ephrin concentrations
Final position is where
inhibition = promotion
Varies according to
position of origin in retina
See ppt for more detail
Positional info from ‘Stop’ signal?
Ephrin A2/A5 double
mutant mice fail to
make topographic maps
In rodents (mammals):
Initial growth of all fibres
extends throughout the
tectum
Subsequently, axon branching and
synaptogenesis occur. It is this that is
sensitive to the ephrin gradient.
There appears to be competition between
the axons for synaptic partners - involving
electrical activity - so that weaker synapses
(and their axons) get eliminated.
However, if T axons have no competitive
disadvantage (ie when ephrins are
missing), then they can compete
throughout the tectum for synapses
Electrical activity can
modulate responses to
guidance cues
Ming et al (2001. Neuron 29: 441-52)
demonstrate that electrical stimulation
can enhance (in the case of netrin) or
reverse (in the case of MAG) the
response to guidance cues
Electrical activity
modulates Ca2+ & cAMP
cGMP also
involved
See paper and ppt
for more detail
Electric activity acts in part
through neurotrophins
Refinement of connections is
activity dependent (or Weiss
was kinda right after all!)
Even in “lower” vertebrates (chick/frog) where
the initial map in the tectum is topographic, it is
still rather coarse-grained and axons from
neighbouring cells make contacts over large,
overlapping areas of the tectum.
At later stages find that some of these
contacts are lost and the map becomes more
precise.
This refinement depends on activity
and on competition between axons.
You have seen this before in your
lectures on the formation of ocular
dominance columns in the visual cortex:
Cells that fire together, wire together
The mechanism of synapse elimination
involves the localised release of
neurotrophic factors which is thought to be
enhanced when two cells fire at the same
time
But what is happening in the embryonic tectum
(superior colliculus) where mapping takes place
before the animal encounters any light?
Embryonic retina is
spontaneously active
In mammals ephrins work
together with electrical activity
(and other survival factors) to
create the topographic map
Tectal mapping occurs
before birth in mammals,
so where does the
electrical activity come
from? (No light?!)
Interestingly, the retina
becomes spontaneously active
as axons reach the tectum
See video on ppt - transient
increases in intracellular calcium
Therefore, could be that Hebbian
principles are already operating (as in
ocular dominance columns)
Consistent with this, treatment with the sodium
channel blocker, tetrodotoxin (TTX), which blocks
action potentials, blocks map refinement
Can show this also by blocking
nAChRs genetically….