A good action is only one drawn
from the right motive/intention
The only true good
motive = duty
Action is good if we OUGHT
to do it, no other reason.
KANT = believed knowledge begins with
the experience, practical reason
(like Plato) defines human nature in terms of
reason and freedom that reason makes possible
(resisted) Aristotle’s prescriptive definition of what it means
to be fulfilled and the detailed laws that hang on definition.
Influenced by science and the
gathering and assessment of
empirical evidence
The force behind his Copernican revolution was the attempt to
reconcile the ambiguity in empirical (of the senses)
Copernican Revolution
Found that his observations made sense once he had realised that
the earth moved around the sun rather than the other way around
-> THEREFORE Kant argued that we experienced the world as we do because that is the way our
sense function. We do not know things as they are in themselves but only as they appear to us.
Reason
Reason = highest facility to Kant
Every human being has the capacity to use reason
A human being is essentially a rational being, and it
is this that constitutes to his intrinsic dignity
If reason is universal; the moral community generated by reason will be universal and applied to all men.
KANT = reason is innate (intellectual power
existing more or less equally in all men)
Duty
Reason for putting good will into action with a sense of duty
Good will + duty = moral decision
Kant = duty should never be forced
Any other action, not out of
duty introduces a motive
Freedom/Autonomy of Free Will
If everyone acted morally, we
would be able to exercise freedom
Opposite of this -> heteronomy (right act of desire)
Reason must not follow, even if it causes happiness for the majority
The Good Will
Kant didn’t believe that any outcome was intuitively good –
pleasure and happiness could result from an extremely evil act
Didn’t believe in ‘good’ traits, as ingenuity, intelligence,
courage, etc. (could all be used for evil)
He used the term good to describe the GOOD WILL, which is the
will to act purely in accordance with one’s duty.
Uses reason to work out duty
Good will + duty =
moral action
The Imperatives
Purity of a motive depends upon the rational commitment to
a universal moral law which is binding on everyone
Laws are expressed as commands are imperatives
and, for Kant, there are the kinds of imperatives:
Hypothetical Imperative
To get to ‘y’ you ought to do ‘x’
To use in situations that don’t require the
‘universal’ ideas of the categorical imperative
Categorical Imperative
Universal Law Principle:
Apply any decision universally -> no
suicide/lies/borrowing money etc.
Action - (wrong if applied universally) - negative impact
“Act only on a maxim whereby you can at the same time
will that it become a universal law”
Treat people as an end; not a means:
Selfish
Universal Kingdom of Ends:
When all members of a society desire
the same good (common ends)
All conflict removed, humans have common aims
Kant – humans prefer morality
Not possible in this life, but it must be attempted.
Summum Bonum
Teleological
It’s the highest good, only achievable in
the moral community
Virtue and happiness is together
OUGHT IMPLIES CAN: an obligation to do something implies
the possibility that the good can be achieved, otherwise there
can be no obligation
Kant: Summum bonum can only be achieved in the next life
Pros and Cons of Kant
Cons:
Problem of capitalism
No place for love/relationships
Consequences are ignored
Do a priori moral laws actually exist?
Are moral laws essentially products
of environment and culture
Issue of moral luck
Law of double effect
Pros:
Straightforward, based on reason
Clear criteria to assess
what is moral
Emphasis on human dignity/worth
Pressure on an individual to act morally
Eradicates bias of family etc.
Universalisable
Each human has the
ability to act morally
(autonomous individuals)