Patients are encouraged to trace back origins of their symptoms in
order to get a better idea of how symptoms developed
Encouraged to evaluate content of their delusions or of any internal voices they hear
+ to consider ways in which they may test validity of faulty beliefs
Therapist lets patient develop their own alternatives to
previously maladaptive beliefs
Ideally by looking for alternative explanations + coping strategies that are already present in patients mind
A02
Effectiveness - supporting research
Research has tended to show CBT has significant effect
on improving symptoms of patients
Gould et al
Found all 7 studies in m-a reported statistically significant decrease in
+ve symptoms of Sz after treatment
Appropriateness - negative symptoms
-ve symptoms may well serve useful function for person +
so can be understood as 'safety behaviours'
Within psychiatric setting, strong expression of emotions might lead to increases in medication or hospital admission
Similarly, inactivity + withdrawal might be seen as a way of avoiding making +ve symptoms worse
CBT offers some hope of alleviating these maladaptive thought processes
CBT - outcome studies
A01
Outcome studies suggest patients who receive CBT experience fewer
hallucinations + delusions + recover their functioning to a greater degree
than those who receive antipsychotic medication alone
Drury et al
Found reduction of +ve symptoms + 25-50% reduction in recovery time for
patients given a combination of antipsychotic medication alone
Kuipers et al
Confirmed these advantages but also noted there were lower patient dropout rates +
greater patient satisfaction when CBT was used in addition to antipsychotic drugs
A02
Effectiveness - how much is due to CBT alone?
Most studies of effectiveness of CBT have been conducted w/
patients treated w/ antipsychotic medication at same time
This makes it difficult, therefore, to assess effectiveness of CBT on its own
Appropriateness - who benefits?
Kingdon + Kirschen
Conducted study in Hampshire w/ 142 Sz patients + found many patients weren't
deemed suitable for CBT because psychiatrists believed they wouldn't fully engage
w/ therapy
Found older patients, in particular, were deemed less suitable than younger patients
Family intervention - reducing expressed emotion
A01
FI is a means to help fam. feel more
confident in their supporting role
There to help fam. members support patient in best way
Allowing them to understand disorder + provide them w/ poss. ways to deal w/ probs.
that can result from living w/ + supporting someone who has experienced psychosis
Reducing expressions of anger from fam. members
Maintaining reasonable expectations of patients behaviour
Reducing burden of care on fam.
A02
Effectiveness - Pharoah et al meta-analysis
Reviewed 53 studies to investigate
effectiveness of FI
Studies conducted compared outcomes from FI to 'standard' care alone
Main results were:
Mental state
Mixed impressions
Some reported improvement in overall MS of patients
compared to those receiving standard care while others
didn't
Compliance w/ medication
Use of FI increased patients compliance w/ medication
Social functioning
Appeared to show some improvement on general functioning, however didn't
appear to have much effect on more concrete outcomes like living
independently or employment
Appropriateness - cultural limitations
Most research evidence comes from studies
conducted outside UK
Hospitalisation levels may differ significantly across countries,
depending on clinical practice within those countries
Therefore date of hospitalisation rates from non-UK countries might not be applicable to UK setting
FI - reduced relapse rates
A01
By helping fam. better understand how Sz works +
by getting them to work on their expression of
emotion this can reduce stress in patients
environment
+ as w/ help of FI compliance w/ medication increased
which will also help control patients psychosis
This leads to a decrease in general relapse rates
A02
Effectiveness - supporting research
NICE
Conducted meta-analysis involving 32 studies + nearly
2500 patients which found significant evidence for
effectiveness of FI
When compared w/ patients receiving standard care alone, there was a reduction in
hospital admissions during treatment + severity of symptoms both during + up to 24
months following intervention
Relapse rate in FI condition was 26% + in control (standard care) condition 50%
Appropriateness - economic benefits
Extra cost of Fi is offset by reduction in costs of
hospitalisation because of lower relapse rates associated w/ FI
Also evidence that FI reduces relapse rates for significant period
after completion meaning more savings are then made