Animals Act 1971

Description

a mindmap on the Animals Act 1971
melissa_yeoman
Mind Map by melissa_yeoman, updated more than 1 year ago
melissa_yeoman
Created by melissa_yeoman about 9 years ago
17
0

Resource summary

Animals Act 1971
  1. The basic principle of the Animals Act 1971 - a person who keeps a dangerous animal has strict liability for any damage which the animal may cause. -a person who keeps an animal which is domesticated and is usually regarded as harmless will only be liable if the animal has given cause to fear that it has unusual characteristics which make it potentially dangerous.
    1. Keeper of the animal may be liable under S6(3)
      1. the keeper is either the keeper of the animal or the head of the household in which a person is under the age of 16
    2. Dangerous species
      1. Definition
        1. under S6(2)- a dangerous species is a species that is a) not commonly domesticated in the British Islands; and b) whose fully grown animals normally have such characteristics that the are likely, unless restrained, to cause severe damage or that any damage they do cause is likely to be severe.
          1. to be classified as 'dangerous' the species must fulfil both sections a and b
        2. liability for dangerous species comes under S2(1) - the keeper is strictly liable for any animal defined as dangerous
          1. Behrens

            Annotations:

            • Dangerous is a question of law in each case.
            1. Frightened elephant at circus ran away and trampled the claimants kiosk, injuring the claimants. Court held that although that particular elephant was not aggressive/violent, the damage an animal of this size is likely to cause would be severe.
              1. Before the act, so it' common law
                1. the act works in the same way
              2. Tutin
                1. C agreed to take part in a camel race at the horse of the year show, was thrown from it and injured. Camel was regarded as a dangerous animal - not commonly domesticated in the UK- but claim was unsuccessful as the defence volenti applied
                  1. before act, so it's common law
                    1. dangerous is a question of law in each case.
                  2. Non-dangerous species
                    1. Defined as any species not classified as dangerous
                      1. Liability exists under S2(2)
                        1. S2(2)(a)
                          1. The damage is of a kind the animal I likely to cause unless restrained or if caused by the animal is likely to be severe
                            1. 'Likely' means possible not probable
                              1. Smith V Ainger
                                1. D's dog -Alsatian cross- history of attacking other dogs. Attacked C's dog, C intervened and was knocked over - breaking his leg. Damage was held to be of a kind the large dog was likely to cause - large dog, knocking over intervening owner = normal.
                              2. 'severe' is a question of fact
                                1. Curtis
                                  1. Bull Mastiff attacked and injured the claimant (aged 11) when he went to talk to the dog while it was being loaded into it's owners car. S2(2)(a) was easily satisfied - big dog with a powerful bite.
                              3. S2(2)(b)
                                1. The likelihood of severity of damage is due to abnormal characteristics of the individual animal or species at specific times
                                  1. A characteristic is abnormal if it is not common in other animals of that species
                                    1. Kite
                                      1. A dog which had a habit of attacking people carrying handbags was held to fall in this category
                                      2. Wallace
                                        1. Horse was known to be nervous - when loaded into a trailer by C, horse jumped forward and injured C. Didn't need a tendency to attack people; S2(2)(b) could be satisfied by the fact that the horse had a tendency to behave a certain way when nervous, that other horses would not.
                                    2. S2(2)(c)
                                      1. The keeper knows of the characteristics
                                    3. Keeper can be liable, even if the event is unforeseeable and not the keeper's fault, for damage caused by characteristics that only arise in certain circumstances
                                      1. Mirvahedy
                                        1. C was severely inured when his car collided with D's horse, that had escaped from an electric and wooden fence with the D's other 3 horses after being frightened but an unknown stimuli. The behaviour that cause the damage could be described as 'characteristics...which are not normally found except in particular times or in particular circumstances' falling within S2(2)(b). The defendants were therefore liable for the damage.
                                    4. Defences
                                      1. S5(2)
                                        1. The victim voluntarily accepts the risk
                                          1. Cummings
                                            1. C was bitten by an Alsatian, which was used as a guard dog in the D's scrap yard. C knew D and had a key to scrap yard. C saw sign that said 'Beware of Dog' and entered anyway, so as held to have voluntarily accepted the risk.
                                                1. Dhesi
                                                  1. C involved in confrontation with the police, waved hockey stick aggressively in the air. Ran and hid in bushes, was warned 3 times that the dog would be set loose if he did not render. He did not so the dog was set loose and C was bitten several times. Voluntarily accepted the risk AND the damage was entirely his fault.
                                              1. S5(1)
                                                1. D will not be liable for any damage that is wholly the fault of the claimant
                                                  1. Sylvster
                                                    1. C went into leopards pen to remove a lit cigarette - was held to be completely at fault
                                                2. S5(3)
                                                  1. Animal was either not kept for protection or was not reasonable to do so
                                                  2. S10
                                                    1. Contributory negligence
                                                  Show full summary Hide full summary

                                                  Similar

                                                  Omissions
                                                  ameliathorn0325
                                                  Sources of Law
                                                  cearak
                                                  Computing Hardware - CPU and Memory
                                                  ollietablet123
                                                  GCSE Biology B2 (OCR)
                                                  Usman Rauf
                                                  Unit 1 flashcards
                                                  C R
                                                  Cell Structure
                                                  megan.radcliffe16
                                                  Exchange surfaces and breathing
                                                  megan.radcliffe16
                                                  AS Chemistry - Enthalpy Changes
                                                  Sarah H-V
                                                  Biology B1.1 - Genes
                                                  raffia.khalid99
                                                  C1 Quiz
                                                  Leah Firmstone
                                                  OCR GCSE History-Paper Two: The Liberal Reforms 1906-14 Poverty to Welfare State NEW FOR 2015!!!
                                                  I Turner