Behaviourism

Description

A Levels Philosophy (A2 - Philosophy of Mind) Mind Map on Behaviourism, created by rlshindmarsh on 08/11/2013.
rlshindmarsh
Mind Map by rlshindmarsh, updated more than 1 year ago
rlshindmarsh
Created by rlshindmarsh over 10 years ago
69
0

Resource summary

Behaviourism
  1. Similar to emergentism, and lends itself to a MATERIALIST view of the relationship/nature of the mind and body
    1. Generally, they seek to reduce mental properties to special types of physical properties, and are thus at odds with cartesian dualism
      1. example - in order to establish whether or not X is angry, we have to look at X's behaviour, and have no direct access to his actual 'feelings', thus we can only be sure of his behaviour
      2. Logical Behaviourism
        1. Wittgenstein 1889-1951
          1. Did not necessarrily disagree with cartesian dualism - saw its problem as a misuse of language
            1. believed that thoughts are expressions of behaviour, not the other way around
            2. Wittgenstein's Beetle - everyone has a small box in which they keep a beetle, but noone is allowed to look in anyone elses box but their own, over time communities come to use the term 'beetle' for the contents of everyone's boxes, despite having no proof that all beetles are identical
            3. Gilbert Ryle 1900-1976
              1. A 'soft' behaviourist, notably addressed the problem of category mmistakes, as demonstrated by the beetle illustration.
                1. argues that it is wrong to appropriate 'mind' with some kind of substance, as it can only mean, by our experience 'what it is like to be me'
              2. Hempel 1905-1997
              3. Psychological Behaviourism
                1. a view about the methods and aims of psychology - psychology aims to predict and control behaviour in animals in terms of thier respoonses to stimuli and patterns of behaviour
                  1. 'recognises no dividing line between man and brute'
                  2. Problems
                    1. the more private the experience, the more difficult it is to explain in behaviourist terms
                      1. problem if different reactions - if one stimulus produces different reactions in receptors, although one can refer to differences in perosonality and upbringing, the very fact that reactions cannot be predicted presents the possibility that a private cartesian self is not determining physical responses?
                        1. the potential veriety of responses to stimuli makes it almost impossible to come up with a theory of a one to one relationship between response and stimulus
                        Show full summary Hide full summary

                        Similar

                        Breakdown of Philosophy
                        rlshindmarsh
                        Who did what now?...Ancient Greek edition
                        Chris Clark
                        Reason and Experience Plans
                        rlshindmarsh
                        The Cosmological Argument
                        Summer Pearce
                        AS Philosophy Exam Questions
                        Summer Pearce
                        Philosophy of Art
                        mccurryby
                        "The knower's perspective is essential in the pursuit of knowledge." To what extent do you agree?
                        nataliaapedraza
                        The Ontological Argument
                        daniella0128
                        Religious Experience
                        alexandramchugh9
                        Chapter 6: Freedom vs. Determinism Practice Quiz
                        Kristen Gardner
                        Environmental Ethics
                        Jason Edwards-Suarez