Mind map
TRUSTS & POWERS
Map content
TRUSTS & POWERS
TRUST - Obliges a person to do something
Power - Enables a trustee to do something
Exhaustive trusts must be exhausted within a specified time
Non exhaustive - Trustees can consider whether or not to exercise their discretion
Beneficiaries cannot compel trustees to exercise their discretion
Trustees can be compelled to exercise their obligations
McPHAIL v DOULTON - Raised 2 questions
- Was this a power or discretionary trust?
- Was it void for uncertainty of objects?
- Applied the test from RE GULBENKIAN - Is it possible to say, with certainty, whether someone is or is not a member of the class?
- Conceptual Uncertainty - Words must sufficiently define the class which the settlor intends to benefit
- Evidential Uncertainty - on a matter of evidence can specific persons prove that they are members of that class?
- Conceptual Uncertainty - Words must sufficiently define the class which the settlor intends to benefit
- Applied the test from RE GULBENKIAN - Is it possible to say, with certainty, whether someone is or is not a member of the class?
- Was it void for uncertainty of objects?
- Was this a power or discretionary trust?
RE HAYS SETTLEMENT TRUSTS
- Hybrid power and discretionary trust to distribute to anyone but settlor and her spouse, power effective but not trust as administratively unworkable
- Discretionary trust - trustee must survey the class before deciding on distribution
- Apply for Benjamin order if one of the beneficiaries is missing
- Discretionary trust will not fail simply because it cannot ascertain every member of class
- RE BADEN'S DEED TRUST (NO2) Person must be able to prove that they are in the class, but discretion still lies with trustee
- Width of the class may cause discretionary trust to fail even if class is conceptually certain
- A power is unlikely to fail for administrative unworkability
- RE MANISTY'S SETTLEMENT - Power cannot be void for number of people involved only, only if terms are capricious (show no sensible intention)
- R v DISTRICT AUDITOR - administratively unworkable but conceptually certain. Not a valid trust as class was 2.5 million so too wide.
- RE MANISTY'S SETTLEMENT - Power cannot be void for number of people involved only, only if terms are capricious (show no sensible intention)
- A power is unlikely to fail for administrative unworkability
- Width of the class may cause discretionary trust to fail even if class is conceptually certain
- RE BADEN'S DEED TRUST (NO2) Person must be able to prove that they are in the class, but discretion still lies with trustee
- Discretionary trust will not fail simply because it cannot ascertain every member of class
- Apply for Benjamin order if one of the beneficiaries is missing
Conditions subsequent and precedent
- RE ALLEN - son had to be a practicing member of CofE when father died, he benefitted
- Subsequent - Must indicate what would constitute the occurence of the condition subsequent
- RE ALLEN - son had to be a practicing member of CofE when father died, he benefitted
Information
- Description
- Degree Equity and Trusts Mind Map on TRUSTS & POWERS, created by costafortune on 02/05/2013.
- Created by
- costafortune
- Views
- 163
- Tags
- Rating