abandoned property belongs to the Crown: Lord
Advocate v University of Aberdeen & Budge
Must be an act of taking, and it must be “sufficient”
Accession
physical union
Permanency
Functional subordination
Effects
Accessory becomes part
of the principal
Conversion
Extinction of title to accessory
Policy considerations
Law will avoid breaking up
Law will avoid rendering property useless
Brand’s Trustees v Brand’s Trustees/
objective application of the law
Accession of moveables to land
Physical union
Christie v Smith’s Executrix
Functional subordination
Leigh v Taylor
Permanence
Degree of permanence, but quasi permanence sufficient
Moveables to moveables
Land to land
Must not be merely temporary
Must be gradual
Accession by fruits
animals in utero
Trees, plants, crops
natural products
Specificatio
inseparable
McDonald v Provan
Wylie Lochhead v Mitchell
Kinloch Damph Ltd v Nordvik Salmon Farms
No consent
General rules
things of the same type are mixed
without prior agreement, and can be
separated, ownership doesn’t change.
Where things of the same
kind are mixed without prior
agreement but cannot
practically be separated,
mixture is common property,
with ownership in proportion
to contribution
Where mixing occurs with prior
agreement, the mixture is
common property
Where new species of thing
is created: specification
Commixtio and confusio
common property- proportion to value of
the constituent materials
materials not substantially the same- specificatio applies