null
US
Sign In
Sign Up for Free
Sign Up
We have detected that Javascript is not enabled in your browser. The dynamic nature of our site means that Javascript must be enabled to function properly. Please read our
terms and conditions
for more information.
Next up
Copy and Edit
You need to log in to complete this action!
Register for Free
817308
Evaluating the Psychodynamic Approach
Description
Mind Map on Evaluating the Psychodynamic Approach, created by callieanna on 05/02/2014.
Mind Map by
callieanna
, updated more than 1 year ago
More
Less
Created by
callieanna
almost 11 years ago
24
1
0
Resource summary
Evaluating the Psychodynamic Approach
STRENGTHS
Nature V Nurture
Psychodynamic Approach = takes into account both sides of the NATURE-NURTURE debate
Explains HOW Nature + Nurture --> Adult personality
FOR EXAMPLE: Freud suggested that we have innate (nature personality structures)
ID
Ego
SuperEgo
Drive Behaviour
Conflict between these elements --> anxiety (nurture)
Repressed into Unconcious Mind
Depression from repressed emotional memories of a family member's death
Nature and Nurture contribute to Adult Behaviour
Freud's theory provides a framework for putting the 2 elements together
CONTRIBUTES TO NATURE V NURTURE DEBATE
Reflects the complexity of human behaviour
Psychodynamic approach = presents a rich account of life experiences
Weaving together different strands of development
Psychosexual development
Hidden Meanings
FOR EXAMPLE: psychoanalysis
Uncover deep meanings
Acknowledges that understanding behaviour is a lengthy process
Alternative methods of explaining behaviour = simpler explanations
Behaviourist: 'recovery from mental disorder can be achieved through re-learning'
Original symptoms may RE-APPEAR because the actual case has been ignored
Ignores Oversimplification
Examining root causes of behaviour
WEAKNESSES
Determinist
Freud saw infant behaviour determined by Innate Forces
Adult Behaviour determined by childhood experiences
FOR EXAMPLE: oral stage, libdo attatched to infants mouth
Psychosexual stages + Libido = Innate Forces
Over Indulgence or Frustration --> typical personality types
Oral Aggressive Behaviour
Implies we have no FREE WILL (choice) about who we become or how we behave
misrepresents human behaviour
May give an individual a plauisble excuse for behaving unreasonably or an excuse for criminal behaviour
Claims cannot be proven wrong
Freud's theory is DIFFICULT to FALSIFY
DREAM ANALYSIS or FREE ASSOCIATION
Therapist may argue that a client who denied having homosexual tendencies is repressing them
If you admit to them OR deny them there is evidence that they exist
A good theory = can be tested
POPPER (1935)
argued that falsification is the only way to be certain
Difficult to generate testable hypotheses from Freud's theory of personality
NOT impossible
Freud predicted an inverse relationship between guilt and wrongdoing
Media attachments
id_ego_superego (image/jpg)
imagesCA1A38I7 (image/jpg)
Show full summary
Hide full summary
Want to create your own
Mind Maps
for
free
with GoConqr?
Learn more
.
Similar
Mapa Mental - Estilos de Aprendizagem
miminoma
Spanish Verbs
Niat Habtemariam
An Inspector Calls - Inspector Goole
Rattan Bhorjee
PHR SPHR Labor Union Terminology
Sandra Reed
GCSE Biology B2 (OCR)
Usman Rauf
Chemistry (C3)
Amy Lashkari
Pathos in Battle
mouldybiscuit
Poetry revision quiz
Sarah Holmes
Teaching Methods Every Educator Should Know
Micheal Heffernan
English spelling rules
Sarah Holmes
SFDC App Builder 1 (1-25)
Connie Woolard
Browse Library