Locke: Ideas for which we do not need experience, those which
can be known from birth (as an empiricist, Locke found innate
knowledge to be impossible)
Universailty: If innate ideas exist, it is supposed they will
be held universally by all humans
Locke (CRIT): Babies cannot explain geometry
RESP: Practical Knowledge
CRIT: Refers to no factual knowledge about the
world, therefore does not dispute Claim 2
RESP: All forms of knowledge amount to practical
knowledge e.g. factual knowledge is the ability to
answer questions in exams, scientific knowledge is
the ability to make accurate predictions about the
world
This theory acknowledges that most
ideas come from experience, however
rationalists claim that a priori knowledge
in the only knowledge
Innate Ideas/Knowledge
Innate Instincts e.g.suckling
Difficult to define instinct as
'knowledge' e.g.does a heart
know when to beat?
Descartes: Idea of God
planted in our minds by God
(Trademark)
Kant: We have an innate
conceptual scheme and so innate
knowledge of causation
Chomsky: We have an innate capacity to learn language, this is
how we are able to so easily pick up grammar from limited
evidence. All languages share deep grammatical structure and so
this knowledge is universal
Moore (intuitionaism): Moral concepts do not come
from experience. 'Good' cannot be defined but is
simply known intuitively
E.g. Good is like the colour yellow, which cannot be
defined. Moral terms are self-evident
O.Q.A: Good cannot be defined as this means 'Good means x'>'Is x really good
(e.g. is it really good to maximise happiness) so Good does not equal maximising
happiness because this would mean 'is good really good?' Concl: Good is undefinable
CRIT: Meaning of word 'good' is unclear in ordinary language, so we are
unwilling to accept a definition. Hume: Emotions account for morality, the
emotional responses are somewhat innate, but are not moral ideas
Plato: Numbers are innate as we have no
sense experience of them e.g. pair of gloves
but no 'two-ness'
'2' is contained in the realm of pure thought
CRIT (Empiricist): Numbers derive from
collections in experience, 3 is a common
denominator
RESP: I have never encountered a
group of 5,381. Descartes:I understand a
chiliagon whilst I cannot picture it in the mind
As are concepts of justice & beauty,
perceived by observation of their
essential qualities
CRIT (Empiricist): Understanding of beauty
through experience
Reason alone can generate knowledge
E.g. Mathematics
Colour: We know that an object
cannot be orange if it is blue all over
This is a truth about the world
CRIT (Empiricist): Example given
relies on the senses and so does not
constitute innate knowledge
CRIT (Empiricist): Concept of chiliagon derives
from experience of similar shapes
RESP: Mathematical truths are innate
Types of Knowledge
Practical Knowedge e.g. I know how to
swim but cannot explain how to someone
else (independant of ability to communicate)
Knowledge by Acquaintance e.g.I know
what Paris is like because I have visited it
Factual Knowledge can be expressed in
language & contains propositional context
e.g.'Socrates was a philosopher'